9/11 – 5 Years later: what the US has not understood – Part 3

Five year after the Islamic Terrorist attack against America, the US seems unable to realize that their supposed enemies, the Islamic Terrorists, are the creature of 200 years of colonial, French and British, illegal involvement in the vast territories of the Ottoman Empire. Instead of dreaming about imposing order and discipline among besotted / fanaticized puppets, the US should outmaneuver colonial policies practiced by France and Britain since Napoleon.

Mistake 3: False enemies

Taking puppets and proxies as real enemies may be an option in local politics of an uncivilized realm where conspiracy intermingles with the lowest of the instincts; however, the same attitude, if pursued by a nuclear power, takes dimensions of ludicrous and pathetic approach. The impossibility of such an approach is clear to everyone: a single individual, a small group of lunatic mysticists, a network of psychologically unbalanced murderers cannot form a possible target of even a small African state. The reason is obvious: the rivalry would be unnaturally disproportionate.

America must get out of the vicious circle where the colonial powers did their best to engulf the White House, the State Department, the Pentagon, and the National Security Council.

Rule 1: Avert the Manichaeist concept of terrorists and moderates!

This is the trap's gate; as soon as you face the dilemma between Ossama bin Laden (enemy) vs. Saudi king Abdallah (friend), you slip into a marsh where there is no exit. One can accommodate within the machination, polarizations like Iranian President Ahmadinejad (foe) vs. Jordanian king Abdallah (ally), extending the trap's possible limits to the level of governments.

There can be only one indicator that America has a potential friend in the Middle East: the person, the government, the country should be void of colonial support, free of colonial machination (as regards past periods), and certainly deprived of any particular role within the colonial scheme.

The American approach should therefore reject any attempt of evaluating friends and considering enemies through taking into consideration words, political discourses, and diplomatic negotiations. In-depth analysis can prove that leaders presenting themselves as US friends are among the worst enemies of America, pursuing terrorist agendas simply set on a different, not easily visible by 'pragmatist' diplomats, timetable.

Rule 2: As Colonial creatures, all the Middle Eastern states are lethal enemies of the US, and of any anti-colonial, democratic concept, principle or ideological system.

All the states in the East of the Atlantic shore of Africa, and in the South of Turkey are colonial creatures; America cannot afford to accept the legitimacy of any artificial entity of this sort.

A brief flashback in History should be necessary here: before 210 years, there were only four states between the Atlantic Ocean and the Indochinese peninsula: the kingdom of Morocco, the Ottoman Empire, the Zend / Qadjar Empire of Iran, and the Maratha successors of Mughal India. Pursuing their expansion, England and France, in well pre-calculated attempts, gradually invaded the entire area, rising as Great Powers. One should not forget that the vast area (over 22 m km2, i. e. larger than the defunct Soviet Union) was and still is predominantly Muslim, and therefore viewed by all Muslims as the natural realm of Dar al Islam, the Islamic World.

In the end, only the nuclei of the Ottoman Empire (the area of today's Turkey) and Iran (present day Islamic Republic of Iran) were never invaded by the colonial powers.

To do so, the Colonial Powers used all possible tricks and machinations, repeatedly rekindling fratricide Sunni – Shia wars (between the Ottoman Empire and Iran), involving Russia as potential threat (to keep sizeable parts of the Ottoman and Iranian armies in the northern part of their territories – here one has to remind unspecialized readership that the entire Black Sea was an Ottoman 'Lake'), and treacherously mobilizing Christian minorities in various parts of the Ottoman Empire (Armenians, Greeks, 'Monophysitic' and Nestorian Aramaeans, Serbians, Croatians, Bulgarians and Romanians) against the Sultan (to later abandon them in their terrible fate at the hands of rather fanaticized Islamic masses, and not Ottoman soldiers).

The Colonial Powers did not arrive as the Crusaders had arrived 600 years earlier, and they had rather the appearance of secular, 'modern', 'national' states; however, this - first - was not perceived as such, and – second - it does exempt them from the reproach of illegitimate involvement, age-long hatred, and undemocratic colonial attempt to usurp natural resources and political supremacy in an area that was and is foreign to them.

Despite the fact that the colonial arrival diffused secularism to large extent (this is also opposed to Islam, as long as we do not attest the rise of a local Muslim secularism as in the times of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk), colonial rulers were accompanied – and at times preceded – by Western Christian priests and monks; even today, a Historian cannot easily dissociate the character of these 'missionaries' from the practices of the secular colonial agents (and later administration): they all were deeply anti-Islamic and profoundly anti-Christian. It would be 'logical' to expect even an extensive practice of anti-Islamic discrimination from the part of Colonial Powers, and one could assume that little of this attitude would arrive in the 19th and 20th century French and British newspapers (except in cases of committed disinformation).

What is even worse for the criminal colonial case of France and Britain is that they pursued the same hatred, the same discrimination, and the same distortion of reality in the case of the Christians, particularly the 'Monophysitic' and Nestorian Aramaeans, who lived in the area of today's Southeastern Turkey, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Israel, Palestine, Kuwait, and Iran, and constitute the religious minority of the local population that was (and still is) Aramaean in its entirety (the majority of the Aramaeans had accepted Islam, and as Islamized they had been linguistically Arabized). As we said already, Vatican preceded France, particularly in the case of Nestorian Aramaeans, who were the worst exposed to the Ottoman – Persian wars (as living on both sides of the borders) in the middle of the 16th century. Promising help, they brought division into two groups (those rejecting and those accepting Pope's supremacy) and false identity to all (easily convincing panicked Eastern Christian masses that they were "Assyrian" or "Chaldaean" of origin). Things would turn worse, because the Sultans and the Shahs, misled by blinded religious leaders – followers of Hanbal and Ibn Taimiya, did not understand the extent of the criminal conspiracy, failing to protect all their citizens from the murderous embrace of the presumably 'innocent' missionaries.

Rule 3: Dismantle Napoleon's colonial plan!

Everything started with the progenitor of all Middle Eastern calamities, Napoleon.

The day the French disembarked in the Egyptian province of the Ottoman Empire was an omen ominous.

The colonial 'product', i.e. the illegal secession of the Egyptian province of the Ottoman Empire, had indeed a predestined and pre-fixed expiry date: on the label one would read: September 11th 2001.

Only French paranoia would make people believe that such a criminal act would be left without consequences. Only extreme mind erosion, intellectual deformation and absolute political aberration would lead to the conclusion that the anti-Islamic and anti-Ottoman hysteria of France would not pay its dividends to the entire world. Thinking that one can avert, divert, prevent, circumvent, bypass and ultimately avoid the consequences of this sort of acts bears witness to total inability to learn from History; it consists in absolute incapacity to correctly predict correctly and wisely anticipate.

Napoleon and his supposedly wise academicians, who accompanied him in his madness for historical grandeur, had probably never read Shakespeare's Macbeth……

September 11th 2001 is the immediate result of July 1st 1798!

Instead of addressing symptoms and side effects, the US Middle Eastern policy should tackle the real reason, the root causes of this unprecedented, destructive influx that affected the entire world, taking finally the form of an injurious outbreak in the world's economic heart and real global capital: New York.

To do so, America needs Historians more than political analysts, groundbreaking Orientalists like Martin Bernal more than 'realistic' diplomats, and anti-Colonial philologists like Edward Said more than supposed US-friendly Middle Eastern royal and presidential tyrants.

Rule 4: Stop viewing some supposedly extremist religious leaders through the falsifying lenses of murderous Pan-Arabist tyrants!

It should be even subtler and more nuanced: the US should cease viewing some supposedly extremist religious leaders through the falsifying lenses of murderous Pan-Arabist tyrants, who immorally and shamelessly present and advertise themselves as US-friendly and realist leaders. If they were true, the analphabetic masses they rule would also be US-friendly. There cannot be any variance between official policy and attested public feeling. Any anti-Americanism is due exclusively to the local, semi-barbaric tyrants in case of lack of Democracy. These points are basics.

Rule 5: Tear down the Arab League!

To ultimately win over Islamic Terrorism and outmaneuver the pending real threats caused by these supposedly US-friendly tyrants, America needs to tear down the most ant-human tyrannical creature of the colonial powers: the Arab League.

It is not the result of simple coincidence that all the murderers involved in the September 11th originate from countries were Arabic has been tyrannically imposed as official language, and Pan-Arabism keeps deforming the non-Arabic identity and character of the local
a) Khammitic Berbers (Mauritania, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya),
b) Khammitic Copts and Nilo-Saharan Nubians (Egypt),
c) Khammitic and Nilo-Saharan peoples of Sudan,
d) Semitic Aramaeans (Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Jordan, Israel, Palestine, SE Turkey, SW Iran, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrein, Emirates), and
e) Semitic Yemenites (not to be confused with the Arabs of Hedjaz).

September 11th criminals were not fanatic Messianic – Mahdist Iranians, Indians or Pakistanis, Turks, Albanians, Africans, or Indonesians; they were not tyrannized Bosnians, Chechnya rebels, or Kashmiri / Filipino fighters. They were Arabic speaking people with altered historical identity, absolute lack of national cultural background, education, let alone pride. They were the products of the murderous factory of Pan-Arabism that was set up by people who had all studied in … France.

To understand why September 11th 2001 truly is the immediate result of July 1st 1798, Americans must
1) reject their false knowledge of Modern (Colonial) Middle Eastern History,
2) correct the preconceived Colonial version of Middle Eastern History (that has been exported to the US by European Orientalist departments – fabrics of falsification), and
3) approach Islam in an academic way similar to that applied in the historical research of Martin Bernal.

If it is a Clash of Civilizations, the main fight will be at the level of Culture, not Canons.