Summit failure blamed on US
The failure of last week's United Nations summit to deliver an agreement designed to prevent terrorists acquiring 'weapons of mass destruction' was sabotaged by the US, senior diplomats have told The Observer.
Officials involved in the negotiations have confirmed that the Bush administration's refusal to countenance any form of disarmament blocked attempts to push measures that would prevent regimes seeking to develop a nuclear capability.
It contradicts reports last week that the US had in fact been furious that plans to crack down on nuclear proliferation were stripped out of the final UN document.
However, diplomats speaking on condition of anonymity have revealed it was in fact President Bush who scuppered what the UN believed was a crucial move in helping make the world safer from the risk of terrorists obtaining a nuclear threat.
Sources reveal that the move has heightened further tensions between the Americans and furious UN officials who believe the issue remains the greatest threat to world peace. Kofi Annan, secretary-general of the UN, told world leaders that the decision to drop all references in the final UN text to disarmament was 'inexcusable', saying that 'weapons of mass destruction pose a grave danger to us all'.
Later, President Bush urged leaders to tackle regimes that 'pursue weapons of mass murder'.
The row comes as the US and Britain attempt to have Iran referred to the UN security council if it does not stop uranium enrichment.
One diplomat said the US refused to accept the 'logical premise' that it must engage in disarmament if it does not to want to encourage a 'new nuclear arms race'.
Mark Malloch Brown, Annan's chief of staff, said that that while progress on terror was positive, the fact no agreement had been made on nuclear weapons meant it was 'a hollow achievement'. Brown told The Observer: 'There is always going to be a terrorist who is going to try and use it [a nuclear weapon]'.
He added: 'More countries are bumping against the nuclear weapons ceiling. And at the same time we have a world energy crisis where countries are turning to nuclear energy as an alternative.'
Officials involved in the negotiations have confirmed that the Bush administration's refusal to countenance any form of disarmament blocked attempts to push measures that would prevent regimes seeking to develop a nuclear capability.
It contradicts reports last week that the US had in fact been furious that plans to crack down on nuclear proliferation were stripped out of the final UN document.
However, diplomats speaking on condition of anonymity have revealed it was in fact President Bush who scuppered what the UN believed was a crucial move in helping make the world safer from the risk of terrorists obtaining a nuclear threat.
Sources reveal that the move has heightened further tensions between the Americans and furious UN officials who believe the issue remains the greatest threat to world peace. Kofi Annan, secretary-general of the UN, told world leaders that the decision to drop all references in the final UN text to disarmament was 'inexcusable', saying that 'weapons of mass destruction pose a grave danger to us all'.
Later, President Bush urged leaders to tackle regimes that 'pursue weapons of mass murder'.
The row comes as the US and Britain attempt to have Iran referred to the UN security council if it does not stop uranium enrichment.
One diplomat said the US refused to accept the 'logical premise' that it must engage in disarmament if it does not to want to encourage a 'new nuclear arms race'.
Mark Malloch Brown, Annan's chief of staff, said that that while progress on terror was positive, the fact no agreement had been made on nuclear weapons meant it was 'a hollow achievement'. Brown told The Observer: 'There is always going to be a terrorist who is going to try and use it [a nuclear weapon]'.
He added: 'More countries are bumping against the nuclear weapons ceiling. And at the same time we have a world energy crisis where countries are turning to nuclear energy as an alternative.'

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- UN Honours Humble Spud With Year of the Potato
- UN Envoy Enters Crisis Talks to Stop Burma Bloodshed
- Darfur Mission Faces Us Funding Hurdle
- Green Light for Un Hariri Inquiry
- Brown Calls for Overhaul of Un, World Bank and Imf
- US Accused of Using Aid to Sway Votes in Un Security Council
- Britain to Defy Us Over Un Resolution on Arms Trade
- Punitive Measures on the Agenda
- United Nations Emergency Meeting to Decide on Force
- Peacekeeping Troops Could Take Months to Assemble
- UN on Brink of Brokering Ceasefire Agreement
- Inquiry Launched Into East Timor Unrest
- Blix Warns of Wmd Vicious Circle
- UN Food Agency Deputy Resigns Over Leader's 'culture of Silence'
- UN Warns of Crystal Meth Pandemic
- UN Condemns Ukraine's Return of Asylum Seekers
- Syria May Aid Un Inquiry Into Hariri Murder
- Aid Chief Urges Charges Over Mass Slum Clearance
- Saddam's Trial Will Not Be Fair, Says United Nations
- The Story of the United Nations



