Florida prisoners to lose DNA option in appeals
Prisoners in Florida seeking a re-examination of older cases will not be able to use DNA testing from next month. The resistance to relying on DNA evidence is being replicated in other states where prosecutors believe scientific data is being relied upon to the exclusion of other evidence and letting the guilty walk free.
Prisoners in Florida seeking a re-examination of older cases will not be able to use DNA testing from next month.
The resistance to relying on DNA evidence is being replicated in other states where prosecutors believe scientific data is being relied upon to the exclusion of other evidence and letting the guilty walk free.
State prosecutors in Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi and New Mexico have opposed requests for testing, arguing that the results would not establish innocence even if they were positive, Barry Scheck, the co-founder of the Innocence Project at the Cardozo law school in New York, told the New York Times.
More than 130 Florida inmates have been freed by DNA testing in the past 15 years. But in 2001 the state legislature set a two-year deadline for DNA retesting in older cases, sending lawyers on a race to make representations on behalf of clients who insist scientific evidence could prove their innocence.
Prosecutors concede that DNA testing is increasingly reliable, but say its relevance to some cases can be exaggerated. They make the distinction between proof that the accused may or may not be linked to a piece of biological evidence and proof that they are innocent of the crime.
Defenders say the prosecutors are trying to short-circuit an important method of establishing innocence when the results do not fit their case.
The resistance to relying on DNA evidence is being replicated in other states where prosecutors believe scientific data is being relied upon to the exclusion of other evidence and letting the guilty walk free.
State prosecutors in Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi and New Mexico have opposed requests for testing, arguing that the results would not establish innocence even if they were positive, Barry Scheck, the co-founder of the Innocence Project at the Cardozo law school in New York, told the New York Times.
More than 130 Florida inmates have been freed by DNA testing in the past 15 years. But in 2001 the state legislature set a two-year deadline for DNA retesting in older cases, sending lawyers on a race to make representations on behalf of clients who insist scientific evidence could prove their innocence.
Prosecutors concede that DNA testing is increasingly reliable, but say its relevance to some cases can be exaggerated. They make the distinction between proof that the accused may or may not be linked to a piece of biological evidence and proof that they are innocent of the crime.
Defenders say the prosecutors are trying to short-circuit an important method of establishing innocence when the results do not fit their case.

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- DNA Evidence vs. Eyewitness Testimony
- Genealogical DNA Test
- Trace Your Roots with DNA
- Defense: No DNA from Duke Lacrosse Players Found on Accuser
- Attachment - Human DNA
- DNA Forensic Profiling
- The Many Applications of DNA Testing
- DNA Testing in the 21st Century
- Mystery of Mozart's Skull Nears Solution
- Baby 81 Reunited With Parents After Court Rules on Dna Tests
- Tsunami Baby to Be Reunited With Parents After Dna Test
- Crowd Storms Baby 81's Hospital
- DNA Backs Lindbergh Family Claim
- DNA Tests After Missiles Strike 'saddam Convoy'
- DNA test could solve the mystery of Columbus's resting place
- US uproar at sloppy DNA tests blunders
- Briton Due to Die Today Seeks Dna Test



