Brazil, India and China Turn Up the Heat on Subsidies
The prospects for a showdown between rich and poor countries at next month's trade summit increased yesterday after the world's three biggest developing countries demanded deep cuts in the west's subsidies for its farmers. Hopes that a deal between Washington and Brussels offering only...
The prospects for a showdown between rich and poor countries at next month's trade summit increased yesterday after the world's three biggest developing countries demanded deep cuts in the west's subsidies for its farmers.
Hopes that a deal between Washington and Brussels offering only modest cuts in agricultural protection would be rubber-stamped at the talks in Cancun, Mexico, faded after Brazil, India and China issued a joint proposal calling for far more radical reform.
The three countries, which account for two thirds of the world's farmers, proposed an end to the export subsidies that allow excess produce in the west to be dumped on world markets and for significant cuts in state payouts to farmers.
With less than a month to go before the gathering of 146 trade ministers at the meeting of the World Trade Organisation, the initiative was aimed at rallying opposition to the European Union and United States plan announced earlier this month.
Agriculture is seen as the main stumbling block to a new round of global trade liberalisation, and last week Brussels and Washington sought to end months of haggling by focusing attention on key issues. The plan was criticised by food exporting countries and by poorer states for not doing enough to reduce the $300bn a year developed countries spend on aiding their farmers.
Brazil, India and China, backed by 12 other developing nations, are urging far more stringent cuts in domestic support programmes than those offered by the EU and the US, the biggest users of subsidies.
They also said rich states should commit themselves to eliminate export subsidies, with special consideration being given to products of concern to developing countries. On import tariffs, the third key area of the talks, developing countries sought to place the biggest responsibility for cuts on the rich, with poorer states being able to reduce less and more slowly.
Celine Charveriat, of Oxfam International, said: "It is high time the farm subsidy superpowers got serious about reforming their destructive agricultural policies."
Hopes that a deal between Washington and Brussels offering only modest cuts in agricultural protection would be rubber-stamped at the talks in Cancun, Mexico, faded after Brazil, India and China issued a joint proposal calling for far more radical reform.
The three countries, which account for two thirds of the world's farmers, proposed an end to the export subsidies that allow excess produce in the west to be dumped on world markets and for significant cuts in state payouts to farmers.
With less than a month to go before the gathering of 146 trade ministers at the meeting of the World Trade Organisation, the initiative was aimed at rallying opposition to the European Union and United States plan announced earlier this month.
Agriculture is seen as the main stumbling block to a new round of global trade liberalisation, and last week Brussels and Washington sought to end months of haggling by focusing attention on key issues. The plan was criticised by food exporting countries and by poorer states for not doing enough to reduce the $300bn a year developed countries spend on aiding their farmers.
Brazil, India and China, backed by 12 other developing nations, are urging far more stringent cuts in domestic support programmes than those offered by the EU and the US, the biggest users of subsidies.
They also said rich states should commit themselves to eliminate export subsidies, with special consideration being given to products of concern to developing countries. On import tariffs, the third key area of the talks, developing countries sought to place the biggest responsibility for cuts on the rich, with poorer states being able to reduce less and more slowly.
Celine Charveriat, of Oxfam International, said: "It is high time the farm subsidy superpowers got serious about reforming their destructive agricultural policies."

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- China's 'biggest Embezzler' is Extradited By Us
- China Censorship Damaged Us, Google Founders Admit
- While the West Takes a Battering, China Weathers the Global Storm
- China Flexes Financial Muscle With $3bn Stake in Us Private Equity Firm
- Wal-Mart Invests in China
- Female Entrepreneur Tops China's Rich List
- China Paves Way for £14bn Bp Oil Stake
- BP Plans a Pioneering Drive Into China
- Boeing Sells First Private Business Jet to Mainland
- RBS Joins Big Players for Slice of Bank of China
- IBM Sale to China Gets Clearance
- China's Player Looks to the Big Game
- China Aims for Slice of Us Car Market
- Flying High - But Will It Float?
- China Facts: Interesting Facts About China
- Zhu Yuanzhang - The Hongwu Emperor
- China, History, and the Moral High Road
- Chinese Couple Welcome Baby "@," to Government’s Annoyance
- Bird Flu Steadily Spreading Through Asian Countries
- Missile Defense: China Strongly Opposes Missile Shield
- China Detains U.S. Geologist, Physically Abuses Him
- Violence Escalates in China
- Popular Sports in China
- Geithner Wants Closer Economic Ties to China
- Weapons of Ancient China
- Religions of Ancient China
- The Qing Dynasty
- Qin Dynasty of China
- History of China
- Physical Features of China
- Increased Chinese Military Power Getting Attention in Pentagon
- Cats on the Menu in China, Drawing the Ire of Pet Lovers
- Tainted Chinese Dairy Exports Recalled Globally After Babies Die
- 6200 Chinese Babies Ill from Contaminated Milk; Three Dead
- Major Earthquakes in China



