Iran Warns the West: Ignore Us at Your Peril
Tehran predicts summit failure as UN observers die in Israeli airstrike.
Iran warned the west yesterday that attempts to broker a Lebanon peace deal at today's Rome summit are destined to fail and predicted a backlash across the Muslim world unless Israel's military forces were immediately reined in.
Senior government officials said the exclusion from the summit of Iran, Syria and their Lebanese ally Hizbullah meant that no lasting settlement was possible.
Hamid Reza Asefi, the foreign ministry spokesman in Tehran, said: "They should have invited all the countries of the region, including Syria and Iran, if they want peace. How can you tackle these important issues without having representatives of all countries in the region?"
The Rome conference is to be attended by the US, Canada, Britain, France, Spain, Germany, Turkey, Russia, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Jordan, as well as the UN and the World Bank. It is due to publish a statement setting out the broad outlines of a possible deal, including the injection of a muscular international stabilisation force which Hizbullah rejected yesterday. But the mood in Rome was soured last night when an Israeli air strike hit a UN monitoring post in south Lebanon, killing four UN peacekeepers from Austria, Canada, China and Finland. Kofi Annan, the UN secretary general, immediately demanded that Israel investigate the direct hit that he said was "apparently deliberate".
"I am shocked and deeply distressed by the apparently deliberate targeting by Israeli Defence Forces of a UN observer post in southern Lebanon," Mr Annan said of the deadliest incident involving the UN force in the two-week conflict.
Fears that the conflict could spread across the region intensified yesterday. King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, a normally placid US ally, warned that "if the option of peace fails as a result of Israeli arrogance, then the only option remaining will be war, and God alone knows what the region would witness in a conflict that would spare no one".
Tony Blair's official spokesman, confronting criticism that the prime minister had failed to call for an immediate ceasefire, insisted he had been working "on a daily, almost hourly basis" for more than a week on the details of a Rome deal.
Responding to yesterday's Guardian ICM poll reflecting widespread unease over the closeness of Mr Blair to George Bush, the spokesman said the findings were contradictory, wanting him to distance Britain from the US while demanding he use his influence on the US to bring about a ceasefire.
The ceasefire, a prisoner exchange and the new international force are expected to comprise the main elements of the Rome deal. The US is also thought to be ready to offer Lebanon the return of the contested Shebaa farms region occupied by Israel since 1982 as part of the package.
But Iran claims that no amount of western effort can bring a breakthrough, with key parties shut out of the negotiating room. A senior Iranian official, speaking by phone from Tehran, said: "Iran and Syria should be involved [in peace negotiations], not because they are sponsors of Hizbullah but because they are regional powers. If Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Egypt are involved, then Iran and Syria should be as well if they are looking to be successful."
The official added that a continuing failure to halt the fighting and reach a just settlement would "certainly spark a backlash" across the Muslim world. He said regional governments had been restrained in their comments so far but that public opinion was increasingly outraged by the destruction of Lebanon.
Last night, Hizbullah's leader Hassan Nasrallah said his group's missiles would start hitting targets deeper into Israel, and warned he would not accept a "humiliating" ceasefire. Another Hizbullah leader hinted that the group had not expected such a ferocious response from Israel, as previous border incidents have usually played out in low-key fashion.
The US, Britain and Israel blame mainly Iran and, to a lesser extent, Syria for the bloodshed in Lebanon, claiming they supply missiles and money to Hizbullah and say that Iran is seeking to deflect attention from UN moves to take punitive action over its nuclear programme.
But Iranian officials say they suspect Israel's action against Hizbullah could be a prelude to a US attack on Iran itself.
Mr Asefi said Iran was providing only "moral aid and moral support" to Hizbullah and wanted to help find a solution but was being excluded from international efforts. We are already doing all that we can. We have spoken to many different Muslim countries, to the Arab countries, to the Organisation of the Islamic Conference [OIC], to Kofi Annan at the UN.
"We asked him what could be done to stop the Israeli aggression. But unfortunately we think the [UN] security council has given the green light."
Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, took a tougher line, criticising the security council for inaction.
"Upon hearing the slightest criticism against the Zionist regime, they issue dozens of resolutions. But now, 13 days after that regime's massive attack against Lebanon, using most fatal weapons, they even refrain from asking for a truce," he said.
The conflict was in danger of spreading through the Middle East "like a hurricane", he added.
An official involved in preparations for the summit lowered expectations for the Rome meeting: "It's going to be a talking shop," he said.
He added: "Iran and Syria are definitely protagonists and people will need to speak to them as this goes on. But this meeting will not find the silver bullet."
Senior government officials said the exclusion from the summit of Iran, Syria and their Lebanese ally Hizbullah meant that no lasting settlement was possible.
Hamid Reza Asefi, the foreign ministry spokesman in Tehran, said: "They should have invited all the countries of the region, including Syria and Iran, if they want peace. How can you tackle these important issues without having representatives of all countries in the region?"
The Rome conference is to be attended by the US, Canada, Britain, France, Spain, Germany, Turkey, Russia, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Jordan, as well as the UN and the World Bank. It is due to publish a statement setting out the broad outlines of a possible deal, including the injection of a muscular international stabilisation force which Hizbullah rejected yesterday. But the mood in Rome was soured last night when an Israeli air strike hit a UN monitoring post in south Lebanon, killing four UN peacekeepers from Austria, Canada, China and Finland. Kofi Annan, the UN secretary general, immediately demanded that Israel investigate the direct hit that he said was "apparently deliberate".
"I am shocked and deeply distressed by the apparently deliberate targeting by Israeli Defence Forces of a UN observer post in southern Lebanon," Mr Annan said of the deadliest incident involving the UN force in the two-week conflict.
Fears that the conflict could spread across the region intensified yesterday. King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, a normally placid US ally, warned that "if the option of peace fails as a result of Israeli arrogance, then the only option remaining will be war, and God alone knows what the region would witness in a conflict that would spare no one".
Tony Blair's official spokesman, confronting criticism that the prime minister had failed to call for an immediate ceasefire, insisted he had been working "on a daily, almost hourly basis" for more than a week on the details of a Rome deal.
Responding to yesterday's Guardian ICM poll reflecting widespread unease over the closeness of Mr Blair to George Bush, the spokesman said the findings were contradictory, wanting him to distance Britain from the US while demanding he use his influence on the US to bring about a ceasefire.
The ceasefire, a prisoner exchange and the new international force are expected to comprise the main elements of the Rome deal. The US is also thought to be ready to offer Lebanon the return of the contested Shebaa farms region occupied by Israel since 1982 as part of the package.
But Iran claims that no amount of western effort can bring a breakthrough, with key parties shut out of the negotiating room. A senior Iranian official, speaking by phone from Tehran, said: "Iran and Syria should be involved [in peace negotiations], not because they are sponsors of Hizbullah but because they are regional powers. If Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Egypt are involved, then Iran and Syria should be as well if they are looking to be successful."
The official added that a continuing failure to halt the fighting and reach a just settlement would "certainly spark a backlash" across the Muslim world. He said regional governments had been restrained in their comments so far but that public opinion was increasingly outraged by the destruction of Lebanon.
Last night, Hizbullah's leader Hassan Nasrallah said his group's missiles would start hitting targets deeper into Israel, and warned he would not accept a "humiliating" ceasefire. Another Hizbullah leader hinted that the group had not expected such a ferocious response from Israel, as previous border incidents have usually played out in low-key fashion.
The US, Britain and Israel blame mainly Iran and, to a lesser extent, Syria for the bloodshed in Lebanon, claiming they supply missiles and money to Hizbullah and say that Iran is seeking to deflect attention from UN moves to take punitive action over its nuclear programme.
But Iranian officials say they suspect Israel's action against Hizbullah could be a prelude to a US attack on Iran itself.
Mr Asefi said Iran was providing only "moral aid and moral support" to Hizbullah and wanted to help find a solution but was being excluded from international efforts. We are already doing all that we can. We have spoken to many different Muslim countries, to the Arab countries, to the Organisation of the Islamic Conference [OIC], to Kofi Annan at the UN.
"We asked him what could be done to stop the Israeli aggression. But unfortunately we think the [UN] security council has given the green light."
Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, took a tougher line, criticising the security council for inaction.
"Upon hearing the slightest criticism against the Zionist regime, they issue dozens of resolutions. But now, 13 days after that regime's massive attack against Lebanon, using most fatal weapons, they even refrain from asking for a truce," he said.
The conflict was in danger of spreading through the Middle East "like a hurricane", he added.
An official involved in preparations for the summit lowered expectations for the Rome meeting: "It's going to be a talking shop," he said.
He added: "Iran and Syria are definitely protagonists and people will need to speak to them as this goes on. But this meeting will not find the silver bullet."

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- Arms Dealer Jailed for Sale of Iranian Guns to Kuwait
- A Humble Beginning Helped to Form Iran's New Hard Man
- Iran Parades Captured and Blindfolded Sailors on Tv
- Iranians Vote in Parliamentary Election
- US Military Chief Quits Amid Claims of Iran Rift
- UK Fears Iran Still Working on Nuclear Weapon
- Government Fights to Keep Ban on Main Iranian Opposition Group
- Decision Time for Us Over Iran Threat
- Iraqi Fighters 'grilled for Evidence on Iran'
- Iran Signals Space Ambitions With Rocket Launch
- Iran Claims Launch Into 'space' of Rocket Capable of Taking Satellites
- Iran Bans Public Executions Amid Death Sentence Boom
- UN Renews Pressure on Iran
- Iran's Supreme Leader Rebuffs Ahmadinejad in Gas Row
- Bush Takes Soundings on Iran
- Amnesty Demands Iran Ends 'grotesque' Stoning Executions
- Bush Urges Arab Allies to Confront Iran, 'the World's Leading Sponsor of State Terror'
- Iranian Man Stoned to Death for Committing Adultery
- Iran Native Drives Through Crowd on UNC-Chapel Hill Campus
- Iran Calls for End to Violence While Students Attend Suicide Bomber Seminars



