Attempt to change status gives LA dogs their day
These are dog days in Los Angeles. Animal rights activists are poised to succeed in a bid for "owners" of pets to be classified as "guardians" on the grounds that the notion of ownership is demeaning to the creatures concerned.
The LA Animal Services Commission has already voted to change the term "owner" to "guardian" in their own documents and next week will decide whether to press for the term to be used city-wide.
The move is part of a campaign led by the organisation In Defence of Animals, based in Marin county, northern California. The organisation has had success in changing the term in some smaller cities and the state of Rhode Island. Although plans for the change have been subjected to predictable ridicule, proponents argue it has a serious point.
Elliot Katz, founder of In Defence of Animals, said the change was to make people think in a more responsible way of their animals, rather than seeing them as property to dispose of when convenient.
Much of the resistance to the change, he said, had come from breeders in whose interests it was for dogs to be seen as property. Some vets in LA have also expressed fears that the change in terms could lead to pets being given rights they do not currently enjoy.
The LA Animal Services Commission has already voted to change the term "owner" to "guardian" in their own documents and next week will decide whether to press for the term to be used city-wide.
The move is part of a campaign led by the organisation In Defence of Animals, based in Marin county, northern California. The organisation has had success in changing the term in some smaller cities and the state of Rhode Island. Although plans for the change have been subjected to predictable ridicule, proponents argue it has a serious point.
Elliot Katz, founder of In Defence of Animals, said the change was to make people think in a more responsible way of their animals, rather than seeing them as property to dispose of when convenient.
Much of the resistance to the change, he said, had come from breeders in whose interests it was for dogs to be seen as property. Some vets in LA have also expressed fears that the change in terms could lead to pets being given rights they do not currently enjoy.

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- Veterinary Scrubs
- Chiang Mai, Thailand’s Temple of the Dogs
- German postmen put dogs on couch
- 10 Tails That Wag the Modern Dog
- Salute Lands Adolf in the Dog House
- The Story of the African Dog
- Dog and Cat Fur 'farmed' in Belgium
- Dogs
- Mayor Villaraigosa and the Truth about Cats and Dogs
- Missing Dog Finds His Way Home... After 6 Years
- Maxine Goes to the Dogs -- or Cats
- Diva Unleashed: Meet the K9 Bell of the Ball
- Jake's Own Story
- You Are The Greatest Teacher
- Organization Sends Valentines to Chained and Penned Dogs
- Mystery Flowers On Dog's 110-Year-Old Grave
- Habitat for Humanity Gasses Prairie Dogs
- NJ Dog Survives Euthanization And Trash Compaction
- Dog Keeps Owner Alive Through Week-Long Ordeal
- Fat Dogs And Englishmen Go Out To Swim
- Medium Sized Dogs That Do Not Shed
- Medium Sized Dogs Good With Children
- Bringing Home Puppy: A Primer
- Good Family Dogs
- Best Dogs for Children - Good Dogs for Kids
- Largest Dog in the World
- Dogs that Do Not Shed
- Choosing the Right Puppy
- Astrology for Dogs
- Welsh Corgi Dogs
- Cats versus Dogs
- Quotes About Dogs
- Developmental Stages of a Puppy
- Boykin Spaniel Dogs
- Dog Care Information



