Australia Offers Afghan Asylum Seekers £3,800 to Go Home
The Australian government yesterday announced that it would pay Afghan families up to $10,000 (£3,800) to return home in an effort to keep asylum seekers out of the country.
The hard-line immigration minister, Philip Ruddock, made the offer to more than 700 Afghans in a refugee camp on the tiny Pacific island of Nauru, and several hundred who remain in the controversial mainland detention centres where Australia sends all its unauthorised arrivals.
He called the package "a generous cash assistance designed to give Afghans real choices about their options upon arrival in Afghanistan."
According to Mr Ruddock, the $10,000 is equivalent to about five years' average annual income in Afghanistan.
But the refugees only have 28 days in which to decide whether to accept the money. If they refuse, they are likely to remain in harsh tropical and desert detention centres and eventually deported.
The Afghans who have been offered the money include those who were refused entry into Australia after they were saved from drowning by a Norwegian freighter, the Tampa, last August.
Despite the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees saying in November that the vast majority were genuine refugees, the Australian government kept them confined in the Nauru camp until Afghanistan became more stable and it could secure a repatriation package with the Kabul government.
Mr Ruddock suggested that the $5m deal could be extended to other Afghans living in Australia on the three-year "temporary protection visas" that the country gives genuine asylum seekers.
In a dramatic and disputed budget this month, the government revealed a package of "border protection" measures costing a staggering $2.87bn (£1.1bn).
These include funding the navy to forcibly turn away boatloads of asylum seekers, building a new offshore detention centre on Christmas Island, and continuing the "Pacific Solution" - in which Australia-bound refugees are "exported" to camps on impoverished Pacific islands.
Refugee groups criticised the measures. "It's bribery on the one hand and blackmail on the other," Simon O'Neill, a spokesman for Refugee Action Collective told the ABC.
"They're faced with terrible conditions in the detention centres in Australia and in Nauru and they have now been chucked a bit of cash to just get themselves away from here.
"It's absolutely outrageous. What should be happening is Afghanis should be offered places to stay here in Australia."
The hard-line immigration minister, Philip Ruddock, made the offer to more than 700 Afghans in a refugee camp on the tiny Pacific island of Nauru, and several hundred who remain in the controversial mainland detention centres where Australia sends all its unauthorised arrivals.
He called the package "a generous cash assistance designed to give Afghans real choices about their options upon arrival in Afghanistan."
According to Mr Ruddock, the $10,000 is equivalent to about five years' average annual income in Afghanistan.
But the refugees only have 28 days in which to decide whether to accept the money. If they refuse, they are likely to remain in harsh tropical and desert detention centres and eventually deported.
The Afghans who have been offered the money include those who were refused entry into Australia after they were saved from drowning by a Norwegian freighter, the Tampa, last August.
Despite the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees saying in November that the vast majority were genuine refugees, the Australian government kept them confined in the Nauru camp until Afghanistan became more stable and it could secure a repatriation package with the Kabul government.
Mr Ruddock suggested that the $5m deal could be extended to other Afghans living in Australia on the three-year "temporary protection visas" that the country gives genuine asylum seekers.
In a dramatic and disputed budget this month, the government revealed a package of "border protection" measures costing a staggering $2.87bn (£1.1bn).
These include funding the navy to forcibly turn away boatloads of asylum seekers, building a new offshore detention centre on Christmas Island, and continuing the "Pacific Solution" - in which Australia-bound refugees are "exported" to camps on impoverished Pacific islands.
Refugee groups criticised the measures. "It's bribery on the one hand and blackmail on the other," Simon O'Neill, a spokesman for Refugee Action Collective told the ABC.
"They're faced with terrible conditions in the detention centres in Australia and in Nauru and they have now been chucked a bit of cash to just get themselves away from here.
"It's absolutely outrageous. What should be happening is Afghanis should be offered places to stay here in Australia."

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- Australia Seeks Future More Peaceful Than Its Past
- The Future of Australia is Drugs
- Australia Signs Up to Kyoto Deal to End 10-year Exile
- Rudd Pledges to Withdraw Australian Troops From Iraq
- Australian Poll Holds Lessons for Labour, Warns Milburn
- Australians Named As World's Worst Polluters
- Australian Minister Warns Against Iraq Pullout
- Australian Police Arrest Man Over Uk Car Bombs
- Australian Detainee Could Be Home in Months
- Australian First to Face Guantanamo Tribunal
- Muslim Clerics in Australia Gagged for 'double-speak'
- Australia Switches on to Light Bulb Change
- Australia Suffers Worst Drought in 1,000 Years
- Australian Muslim Leader Compares Uncovered Women to Exposed Meat
- McCartney Hysteria Sweeps Australia Once Again
- "Crocodile Hunter" Steve Irwin Killed by Stingray in Australia
- A Civilized Savagery: The Story of Stolen Generations
- Australia: The Slang Down Under
- Survivor: Love in the Australian Outback
- From The Land Down Under: Australian Government Questions 'Survivor' Flight



