Last-minute Eu Deal Reached on Asylum
Protests at 'lowest common denominator' agreement.
Britain and its EU partners last night agreed common rules for handling asylum seekers, narrowly meeting their deadline for a deal in time for the union's enlargement to 25 members tomorrow.
Months of negotiations ended when Germany dropped last-minute objections to proposals which the UN and rights groups warned would mean a lowering of standards of protection for refugees. "It was the missing element in finalising the common EU asylum programme," said the Irish justice minister, Michael McDowell, who chaired the meeting.
The deal establishes common procedures for granting and withdrawing refugee status and agreeing lists of safe third countries to which rejected asylum seekers can be sent. Practices in the UK will not be affected because of its opt-out from the Schengen passport-free zone.
British officials said they had secured significant concessions, though the Refugee Council accused the government of "driving standards down".
The idea is to end current differences in approach to eliminate so-called asylum shopping, when asylum seekers pick the country offering them the most advantageous conditions. Politically, this is highly sensitive, with governments across the continent facing demands for curbs on illegal immigration and economic migrants who abuse refugee status.
The search for a common asylum policy dates back to the Tampere summit in 1999.
The UN high commissioner for refugees fears that under the harmonisation changes many asylum seekers may not be allowed to await the outcome of an appeal against a rejection of their claim, and will be sent back before there is a definitive ruling.
The changes also allow member states to return asylum seekers to countries they passed through on their way to Europe if the EU considers them safe and thus capable of providing the asylum sought.
The European Council on Refugees and Exiles (representing 76 organisations in 30 countries) asserted that border guards ignorant of refugee law would be deciding on the removal of asylum applicants. But Antonio Vitorino, the EU justice commissioner, said the agreement assured "a minimum level of protection and procedural safeguards in all member states for those who are genuinely in need of international protection".
It was also designed to prevent abuses that "undermine the credibility of the system".
Last month, ministers fixed minimum levels of social benefits, employment and healthcare for refugees.
Lady Ludford, the London MEP and Liberal Democrat justice spokeswoman, said governments had not only stalled and delayed on common asylum rules, "they have also only reached agreement by going for the lowest common denominator".
• £204m was spent on legal aid for immigration and asylum cases in 2003-04, almost 16% up on the previous year, despite a halving in asylum applications recorded last year, said Britain's constitutional affairs minister, David Lammy, in response to a written parliamentary question from the Tory spokesman, Nick Hawkins. In a separate written response, Mr Lammy disclosed that such cases (90% of which concerned asylum) took up 9.2% of the total legal aid bill for England and Wales in 2002-03 - up from 7.4% the previous year.
Leader comment, page 29
Months of negotiations ended when Germany dropped last-minute objections to proposals which the UN and rights groups warned would mean a lowering of standards of protection for refugees. "It was the missing element in finalising the common EU asylum programme," said the Irish justice minister, Michael McDowell, who chaired the meeting.
The deal establishes common procedures for granting and withdrawing refugee status and agreeing lists of safe third countries to which rejected asylum seekers can be sent. Practices in the UK will not be affected because of its opt-out from the Schengen passport-free zone.
British officials said they had secured significant concessions, though the Refugee Council accused the government of "driving standards down".
The idea is to end current differences in approach to eliminate so-called asylum shopping, when asylum seekers pick the country offering them the most advantageous conditions. Politically, this is highly sensitive, with governments across the continent facing demands for curbs on illegal immigration and economic migrants who abuse refugee status.
The search for a common asylum policy dates back to the Tampere summit in 1999.
The UN high commissioner for refugees fears that under the harmonisation changes many asylum seekers may not be allowed to await the outcome of an appeal against a rejection of their claim, and will be sent back before there is a definitive ruling.
The changes also allow member states to return asylum seekers to countries they passed through on their way to Europe if the EU considers them safe and thus capable of providing the asylum sought.
The European Council on Refugees and Exiles (representing 76 organisations in 30 countries) asserted that border guards ignorant of refugee law would be deciding on the removal of asylum applicants. But Antonio Vitorino, the EU justice commissioner, said the agreement assured "a minimum level of protection and procedural safeguards in all member states for those who are genuinely in need of international protection".
It was also designed to prevent abuses that "undermine the credibility of the system".
Last month, ministers fixed minimum levels of social benefits, employment and healthcare for refugees.
Lady Ludford, the London MEP and Liberal Democrat justice spokeswoman, said governments had not only stalled and delayed on common asylum rules, "they have also only reached agreement by going for the lowest common denominator".
• £204m was spent on legal aid for immigration and asylum cases in 2003-04, almost 16% up on the previous year, despite a halving in asylum applications recorded last year, said Britain's constitutional affairs minister, David Lammy, in response to a written parliamentary question from the Tory spokesman, Nick Hawkins. In a separate written response, Mr Lammy disclosed that such cases (90% of which concerned asylum) took up 9.2% of the total legal aid bill for England and Wales in 2002-03 - up from 7.4% the previous year.
Leader comment, page 29
Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.
Use the form below to email this article to your friends.
- Retailers Accused of Ignoring Bangladeshi Workers' Plight
- Tokyo Catch: Fish Market Bars Tourists
- Attorney Urged to Hand Over Torture Evidence
- Canada's Pm Clings on to Power As Parliament Suspended
- After Serving Time, Hotel Staff to Serve Guests
- Downturn Hits Dubai's Building Bonanza
- Israeli Riot Police Evict Settlers in Hebron
- EU Trio Press Germany for Bigger Contribution to Stimulus Plan
- 'Lost Decade' a Warning to West
- Thousands of American Job Losses Announced After Worst Month for Employment Since 1980