Diversity Summit is a Failure, Critics Say
Diplomats from 182 countries wrangled over details of a statement on the future of the world's forests yesterday as the biodiversity convention meeting in the Hague ended in what critics described as abject failure. This 10th anniversary gathering - the sixth time the convention has...
Diplomats from 182 countries wrangled over details of a statement on the future of the world's forests yesterday as the biodiversity convention meeting in the Hague ended in what critics described as abject failure.
This 10th anniversary gathering - the sixth time the convention has convened since it was set up at the Rio Earth Summit in 1992 - was supposed to show real progress in the fight to prevent the continued mass extinction of plants and animals as forests are destroyed and natural systems polluted and degraded.
A statement agreed by 120 ministers at the close of the conference acknowledged that "biological diversity is being destroyed by human activities at unprecedented rates", but produced few concrete plans to prevent it happening.
The only aim agreed was to have "instruments in place to stop and reverse the current alarming biodiversity loss at the global, regional, sub-regional and national levels by the year 2010".
The statement is due to go to the Rio+10 summit in Johannesburg in August, which is to review progress on environment and sustainable development in the past 10 years.
At the convention's inception it was hoped that a forest agreement would soon be reached.
After years of effort, the whole issue was handed over to the biodiversity convention to sort out, and it has still not been achieved.
Countries such as Brazil and Malaysia have refused point blank to have controls placed on their forestry activities by the international community.
Joy Hyvarinen, international treaties adviser at the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, and a veteran of convention meetings, said: "After 10 years of these meetings there is no impact I can discern on slowing down the destruction of the natural world, but they have set up a wonderful bureaucracy for discussing it.
"The issue is vitally important but it is a real pity not to have been able to better than this."
She said that Birdlife International, of which RSPB is a member, was reconsidering its attendance at the meetings, adding: "This conference has been a disaster and an abject failure. Our resources and effort are better spent elsewhere."
The only bright spot for the convention was an agreement on access to genetic resources so that medicinal plants can be exploited and compensation paid to both the countries of origin and the drug companies that exploit them.
This 10th anniversary gathering - the sixth time the convention has convened since it was set up at the Rio Earth Summit in 1992 - was supposed to show real progress in the fight to prevent the continued mass extinction of plants and animals as forests are destroyed and natural systems polluted and degraded.
A statement agreed by 120 ministers at the close of the conference acknowledged that "biological diversity is being destroyed by human activities at unprecedented rates", but produced few concrete plans to prevent it happening.
The only aim agreed was to have "instruments in place to stop and reverse the current alarming biodiversity loss at the global, regional, sub-regional and national levels by the year 2010".
The statement is due to go to the Rio+10 summit in Johannesburg in August, which is to review progress on environment and sustainable development in the past 10 years.
At the convention's inception it was hoped that a forest agreement would soon be reached.
After years of effort, the whole issue was handed over to the biodiversity convention to sort out, and it has still not been achieved.
Countries such as Brazil and Malaysia have refused point blank to have controls placed on their forestry activities by the international community.
Joy Hyvarinen, international treaties adviser at the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, and a veteran of convention meetings, said: "After 10 years of these meetings there is no impact I can discern on slowing down the destruction of the natural world, but they have set up a wonderful bureaucracy for discussing it.
"The issue is vitally important but it is a real pity not to have been able to better than this."
She said that Birdlife International, of which RSPB is a member, was reconsidering its attendance at the meetings, adding: "This conference has been a disaster and an abject failure. Our resources and effort are better spent elsewhere."
The only bright spot for the convention was an agreement on access to genetic resources so that medicinal plants can be exploited and compensation paid to both the countries of origin and the drug companies that exploit them.

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- Environment: Huge Increase in Spending on Water Urged to Avert Global Catastrophe
- World Co2 Levels at Record High, Scientists Warn
- Waste Not, Want Not
- Current Environmental Issues
- Why does Deforestation Happen?
- Soil Erosion
- Soil Conservation
- Environmental Problems
- Save the Environment: Support your local Carwash
- United States Political Activism: How Political Activism Affects Our Society
- Is bamboo really an environmentally friendly alternative to wood for making paper?
- Can you explain what "hormone disrupting" chemicals are, how they affect our health and what they have to do with environmental problems?
- The New Planet Earth - Unity Expanded
- 10 Ways to Conserve Soil
- Ways to Conserve Soil
- Simple Ways to Save the Environment
- What is Environmental Ethics?
- Sustainable Living Ideas
- What is a Carbon Footprint
- Ways to Reduce Ecological Footprint
- Ozone Layer Depletion: Effects and Causes of Ozone Depletion
- How does Mining Affect the Environment
- How do Humans Affect the Environment
- How to Go Green At Home
- Environment
- The Carbon Cycle Steps
- Earth Day Games And Activities
- Earth Day Facts: What is Earth Day
- With Obama to Take Office, World Looks to U.S. on Environment
- Don't Let "Going Green" Make You Blue
- Indulgent Offsets: can we Buy off our Environmental Sins?
- Ecological Footprint
- Causes of Overpopulation
- List of Environmental Problems
- What are the health and environmental issues associated with the noise and air pollution at airports?



