Widow Blames Us Officials for Guatemala Dirty War Death
The American widow of a Guatemalan leftwing leader who was tortured and killed by a CIA "asset" 10 years ago is seeking the right to sue the then secretary of state Warren Christopher and two national officials for his death. Jennifer Harbury's application to bring a case against former...
The American widow of a Guatemalan leftwing leader who was tortured and killed by a CIA "asset" 10 years ago is seeking the right to sue the then secretary of state Warren Christopher and two national officials for his death.
Jennifer Harbury's application to bring a case against former senior US officials, which reached the supreme court this week, could throw light on the role of the US intelligence services in the "dirty wars" fought by death squads in Central America in the past 30 years.
Ms Harbury, herself a lawyer, went to the supreme court to argue that she has the right to bring a civil action against named government officials, including Mr Christopher, the former national security adviser Anthony Lake, and the former ambassador to Guatemala Marilyn McAfee.
Efrain Bamaca-Velasquez was kidnapped and held by members of the Guatemalan armed forces in March 1992. At first the army told Ms Harbury that her husband had committed suicide, but the grave in which she was told he was buried did not contain his body.
She had also asked US officials for information and for help in tracing her husband. She was told that the US had no information about him.
Three years later, after inquiries by the Democratic senator Robert Torricelli, classified documents were released showing that Bamaca-Velasquez had been killed on the orders of an officer who was described as an "asset" of the CIA: someone who was not employed by the agency but assisted it.
The US knew at the time of her husband's kidnapping who had carried it out but, Ms Harbury says, it chose to tell her that it had no information.
The government's lawyers argue that the case should not proceed, on the grounds that government officials are entitled to give misleading information.
"There are lots of different situations when the government has legitimate reasons to give out false information," the solicitor general, Theodore Olson, told the supreme court this week.
Ms Harbury argued that if she had known that her husband was being held by people connected to the CIA she could have sought a legal injunction to prevent the CIA "requesting and paying for continued information being extracted by torture of a living prisoner".
Ms Harbury, the author of Searching for Evarado (a leftwing guerrilla commander) has held two hunger strikes in Guatemala City and one outside the White House, to draw attention to the case.
Jennifer Harbury's application to bring a case against former senior US officials, which reached the supreme court this week, could throw light on the role of the US intelligence services in the "dirty wars" fought by death squads in Central America in the past 30 years.
Ms Harbury, herself a lawyer, went to the supreme court to argue that she has the right to bring a civil action against named government officials, including Mr Christopher, the former national security adviser Anthony Lake, and the former ambassador to Guatemala Marilyn McAfee.
Efrain Bamaca-Velasquez was kidnapped and held by members of the Guatemalan armed forces in March 1992. At first the army told Ms Harbury that her husband had committed suicide, but the grave in which she was told he was buried did not contain his body.
She had also asked US officials for information and for help in tracing her husband. She was told that the US had no information about him.
Three years later, after inquiries by the Democratic senator Robert Torricelli, classified documents were released showing that Bamaca-Velasquez had been killed on the orders of an officer who was described as an "asset" of the CIA: someone who was not employed by the agency but assisted it.
The US knew at the time of her husband's kidnapping who had carried it out but, Ms Harbury says, it chose to tell her that it had no information.
The government's lawyers argue that the case should not proceed, on the grounds that government officials are entitled to give misleading information.
"There are lots of different situations when the government has legitimate reasons to give out false information," the solicitor general, Theodore Olson, told the supreme court this week.
Ms Harbury argued that if she had known that her husband was being held by people connected to the CIA she could have sought a legal injunction to prevent the CIA "requesting and paying for continued information being extracted by torture of a living prisoner".
Ms Harbury, the author of Searching for Evarado (a leftwing guerrilla commander) has held two hunger strikes in Guatemala City and one outside the White House, to draw attention to the case.

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- Fading Away By Lamplight - How Expert Help Could Have Saved Mother and Child
- US Seizes Migrant's Life Savings
- Child-trafficking Fears As Guatemalan Police Rescue 46 From House
- 'Stolen' Guatemalan Children Freed in Raid
- Delegation to Seek Justice for Guatemalan Trade Unionist
- £700 for a Child? Guatemalan 'baby Factory' Deals in Misery and Hope
- US Tries to Stop Chávez Stealing Bush's Thunder
- UN Standoff Ends in Panama Compromise
- Panama Emerges As Security Council Compromise
- Guatemala: Death Toll Rises to 650 As Rescuers Dig for Corpses
- Guatemalan village wiped out as mudslides kill hundreds
- 31 Killed in Rioting at Seven Jails in Guatemala
- Ex-dictator to Run for President
- Justice and military on trial in Guatemala
- Brave sister scents victory in death plot trial
- Guatemalan militia to get massacre reward
- Guatemala: Antigua: You’ll Be Greeted By Cobblestone Streets, Colorfully Clad Pedestrians, and Classical Architecture
- Destination: Guatemala: Historia de Guatemala



