Datran Media Must Pay $1.1M for Sending Unsolicited Spam E-Mails
A leading e-mail marketer has agreed to a $1.1 million settlement with the New York Attorney General’s office after being accused of breaching Internet privacy in order to flood millions of e-mail In boxes with spam.
The "customer acquisition" companies who had personal data "mined" by Datran proclaimed adamantly on their websites that the information provided to them by consumers would not be sold or distributed to anyone else. Consumers were often lured into providing the sites with their names, addresses, telephone numbers, and even financial data in exchange for free items such as DVD movies and iPods. Many such sites request personal data to use it for marketing and so that companies can better tailor their products to customers’ needs and wants. Usually the site operators pledge not to sell the names or e-mail addresses that accompany that data.
Spitzer accused Datran of knowing that those companies had pledged to keep customer information private, but they spammed those unsuspecting customers anyway, flooding their In boxes with ads for diet pills, discount drugs, sexual enhancement products, and other items. The Attorney General’s staff said that they believe Datran’s offenses to be the largest deliberate breach of Internet privacy unearthed by U.S. authorities to date.
Spitzer’s office began to look into Datran’s practices after an Internet security assurance company came to them with suspicions of improper activities. "Personal information equals marketing dollars," Spitzer said. "You learn more about consumers who you want to target in a hundred different ways and there’s nothing wrong with that if you get the information properly."
Datran agreed to reform its practices under the $1.1 million settlement, but company spokesman Mark Naples said that Datran never received any financial data and never sent e-mails regarding discount price pharmaceuticals. He said that although 6 million e-mails were involved in the accusations, that number doesn’t represent 6 million people. "We have always been and remain committed to industry best practices," Naples said. "Therefore, we are pleased to resolve this matter with the attorney general and are gratified that his office worked collegially with us."


Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- Internet Privacy
- Hot Legal Issue Of The Day – Right To Privacy
- Privacy And Security Features Of Internet Explorer
- Ever Got Busted By The World Wide Web?
- Boost for Google in Internet Privacy Case
- Google Urges Un to Set Global Internet Privacy Rules
- Regulate the Internet!
- Blackmail Claim Stirs Fears Over Facebook
- Watchdog Accuses Google of Invading the Privacy of Its Internet Surfers
- Eye in The Sky: Who's Watchin' You?
- Google to Erase Information on Billions of Internet Searches
- Protecting Your Company’s Privacy
- Privacy Makes Bug Detectors a Must
- Google Privacy Battle Likely to End in Compromise
- Meanwhile, Company Remains at Loggerheads With Us Government
- How to protect your privacy with a Spyware blocker and remover
- Do You Want Someone To Know Your Secrets? Protect Yourself with a Firewall



