Bayer denies it knew of drug risk before withdrawal
German health care and pharmaceuticals group Bayer yesterday hit back at reports that executives may have known about problems with its anti-cholestrol drug, Baycol, before it was withdrawn.
Philip Beck, a lawyer acting for Bayer in the US, said he was confident that the company had acted properly.
"We think we acted responsibly in the development and marketing of the medicine as well as in our efforts to keep the medical community informed of areas where they should be cautious," he said.
Baycol, also known as Lipobay, was withdrawn from the market in August 2001 when it emerged that it was linked with the potentially deadly muscle condition known as rhabdomyolysis.
Withdrawal of the drug cost Bayer £600m and left it facing thousands of lawsuits. Bayer shares have plunged by a fifth in value since the New York Times cited company documents indicating Bayer executives may have known about problems with Baycol some time before it was withdrawn.
Investors are concerned that if it is shown that executives did know about the problems well ahead of the decision to withdraw the drug it could affect Bayer's insurance cover against claims, escalating the potential liabilities facing the group. Yesterday the shares fell almost €2 to €12.32.
In total Bayer is facing some 7,800 claims. It has reached out of court settlements with 450 claimants and, according to Mr Beck, is in active discussions with lawyers acting for another 500.
He said the vast majority of claims did not come from people who had actually experienced side-effects.
"A very small percentage involve people who actually suffered side-effects from the medicine. But the very large percentage of claims involve people who did not suffer any side-effects and for whom the medicine worked safely and effectively." Bayer will continue to resist claims where there is no evidence of side-effects.
Lawyers acting for claimants in the Texas trial are seeking to win class action status for their case. A decision is expected in the next two weeks.
· Shire Pharmaceuticals said yesterday it was suing rival US drug maker Barr in an attempt to block a cheap copycat version of its top-selling Adderall XR, used in the treatment of hyperactivity. The UK group said the action could delay US regulators' approval of Barr's version for up to 30 months.
Philip Beck, a lawyer acting for Bayer in the US, said he was confident that the company had acted properly.
"We think we acted responsibly in the development and marketing of the medicine as well as in our efforts to keep the medical community informed of areas where they should be cautious," he said.
Baycol, also known as Lipobay, was withdrawn from the market in August 2001 when it emerged that it was linked with the potentially deadly muscle condition known as rhabdomyolysis.
Withdrawal of the drug cost Bayer £600m and left it facing thousands of lawsuits. Bayer shares have plunged by a fifth in value since the New York Times cited company documents indicating Bayer executives may have known about problems with Baycol some time before it was withdrawn.
Investors are concerned that if it is shown that executives did know about the problems well ahead of the decision to withdraw the drug it could affect Bayer's insurance cover against claims, escalating the potential liabilities facing the group. Yesterday the shares fell almost €2 to €12.32.
In total Bayer is facing some 7,800 claims. It has reached out of court settlements with 450 claimants and, according to Mr Beck, is in active discussions with lawyers acting for another 500.
He said the vast majority of claims did not come from people who had actually experienced side-effects.
"A very small percentage involve people who actually suffered side-effects from the medicine. But the very large percentage of claims involve people who did not suffer any side-effects and for whom the medicine worked safely and effectively." Bayer will continue to resist claims where there is no evidence of side-effects.
Lawyers acting for claimants in the Texas trial are seeking to win class action status for their case. A decision is expected in the next two weeks.
· Shire Pharmaceuticals said yesterday it was suing rival US drug maker Barr in an attempt to block a cheap copycat version of its top-selling Adderall XR, used in the treatment of hyperactivity. The UK group said the action could delay US regulators' approval of Barr's version for up to 30 months.

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- Bayer 'put Asians in Danger of Hiv'
- In the Time It Takes You to Read This Article Pfizer Will Make $250,000. So Does It Have a Duty to Provide Cheap Drugs to the Poor?
- Schering-Plough Admits Lying To US Government
- Reno Jury Orders Wyeth to Pay $134 Million in Premarin Case
- Pharmaceutical Giant Pfizer Announces Job Cuts, Plant Closures
- Gates' Charity Shifts Policy
- Diseases of Rich Deprive Poor of Drugs
- Novartis Makes £4.4bn Move Into Cut-price Drug Making
- Investors Urge Drug Firms to Do More for World's Poor
- Aventis Braced for €60bn Bid From Its Smaller Rival
- War on Cheap Drugs
- Ruling Opens the Door for Cut-price Hiv Drugs
- Pfizer spikes cactus drug deal
- Bio-techs merge to cut costs
- Glaxo Cuts Price of Aids Drugs in Poor Countries
- Bayer insurance may not cover claims
- British drugs giant in Italian bribery investigation



