Lobbyists Fight to Fly Aborted Foetus Ads Over Hawaii Beaches
An anti-abortion group has gone to court to argue its right to fly pictures of aborted foetuses over tourist beaches on the Hawaiian island of Oahu, as aerial advertisements.
An anti-abortion group has gone to court to argue its right to fly pictures of aborted foetuses over tourist beaches on the Hawaiian island of Oahu, as aerial advertisements.
The Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform, based in California, already displays pictures of first-term aborted foetuses on billboards on the sides of trucks, as well as pictures of what it claims are aborted limbs on its website home page. Now it wants to take its message to the skies.
Robert Muise, a lawyer for the centre, told three judges from the San Francisco-based ninth US circuit court of appeals that flying the pictures over sunbathing holidaymakers was the only way his clients could make their point effectively. "That's the essence of their message," said Mr Muise. "Those pictures convey messages that are rhetorically inexpressible."
Claiming the ban violated freedom of speech, the organisation said it also effectively thwarted their ability to engage in public debate and influence opinion. They are seeking protection under the first amendment, which guarantees freedom of speech.
Jon Van Dyke, the city's special deputy counsel, told the court that the proposed banners would pollute Hawaii's natural beauty and make the island less attractive to tourists. "We have a unique, wonderful place. We have outstanding scenery that people come from all over the world to see. This is important for us who live here, and it's vital to our economy."
The centre has been allowed to fly the banners, some as big as 15.2 metres (50ft) high by 30.4 metres long, from aircraft in 19 states.
The Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform, based in California, already displays pictures of first-term aborted foetuses on billboards on the sides of trucks, as well as pictures of what it claims are aborted limbs on its website home page. Now it wants to take its message to the skies.
Robert Muise, a lawyer for the centre, told three judges from the San Francisco-based ninth US circuit court of appeals that flying the pictures over sunbathing holidaymakers was the only way his clients could make their point effectively. "That's the essence of their message," said Mr Muise. "Those pictures convey messages that are rhetorically inexpressible."
Claiming the ban violated freedom of speech, the organisation said it also effectively thwarted their ability to engage in public debate and influence opinion. They are seeking protection under the first amendment, which guarantees freedom of speech.
Jon Van Dyke, the city's special deputy counsel, told the court that the proposed banners would pollute Hawaii's natural beauty and make the island less attractive to tourists. "We have a unique, wonderful place. We have outstanding scenery that people come from all over the world to see. This is important for us who live here, and it's vital to our economy."
The centre has been allowed to fly the banners, some as big as 15.2 metres (50ft) high by 30.4 metres long, from aircraft in 19 states.

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- Irish Teenager Wins Abortion Fight
- Irish Judge Stirs Up Abortion Debate By Ruling 17-year-old Can Travel to Uk for Termination
- Irish Police Cannot Stop Girl Leaving for Abortion
- Irish Court Battle Over Teenager's Abortion Right
- Campaigners Celebrate As Mexico City Legalises Abortion on Demand
- Court Censures Poland for Denying Abortion Rights
- Anti-Abortion Arguments - Reasons Against Abortion
- Have You Killed Your Baby?
- Abortion Facts and Statistics
- Facts About Abortion
- What Does The Bible Say About Abortion?
- The ‘Lost’ Girls of Asia
- The Pill causes early abortion!
- U.S. Supreme Court Veers Right with Vote to Uphold Abortion Ban
- South Dakota Considers Banning Abortions
- Supreme Court Hears Arguments about Partial-Birth Abortion Ban
- Woman Sues Clinic Because Botched Abortion Leaves Baby Injured
- South Dakota Legislation Makes Abortions Illegal
- South Dakota Legislature Approves Ban on All Abortions
- Federal Appeals Courts Rule Against Partial Birth Abortion Ban



