White House uses courts to end dock strike
George Bush earned the wrath of America's trade unions and provided an opening to Democratic election campaigners yesterday when he became the first president in nearly 25 years to use the courts to end a labour dispute, in response to a strike that has paralysed West Coast ports.
Mr Bush said government lawyers would seek a court order to re-open some 30 Pacific ports, closed for 10 days after management locked out dock workers staging a slowdown.
With the dispute costing some $2bn a day, and about 200 ships stranded and waiting to be unloaded, Mr Bush appeared to acknowledge popular concerns about the fragile economy. Polls yesterday showed that Americans wanted to devote more attention to the economy than to Iraq.
However, commentators said the calculation could backfire on Mr Bush, with Democratic leaders - who are campaigning for midterm elections, now less than a month away - exploiting trade union anger at the decision.
It was the first use of the Taft-Hartley Act since 1978, and the first time any US president has invoked the legislation during a management lockout. The legislation calls for a return to work and an 80-day cooling-off period.
"This has never happened in the US before," said Richard Trumke, the secretary treasurer of the AFL-CIO union. "No president has ever been on the side of management so overtly."
Explaining his decision, Mr Bush said economic damage from the dispute had spread across the country and the economy, endangering the jobs of farmers, automotive workers and others.
He also said the dispute was endangering America's security. "These ports load the ships that carry supplies to our men and women in uniform. These ports also receive parts and materials used by our defence contractors to complete projects and maintain military equipment," he said.
But labour leaders accused Mr Bush of colluding with the port operators, who locked out some 10,000 dock workers on September 29 after a deadlock in negotiations on jobs and new technology.
Mr Bush said government lawyers would seek a court order to re-open some 30 Pacific ports, closed for 10 days after management locked out dock workers staging a slowdown.
With the dispute costing some $2bn a day, and about 200 ships stranded and waiting to be unloaded, Mr Bush appeared to acknowledge popular concerns about the fragile economy. Polls yesterday showed that Americans wanted to devote more attention to the economy than to Iraq.
However, commentators said the calculation could backfire on Mr Bush, with Democratic leaders - who are campaigning for midterm elections, now less than a month away - exploiting trade union anger at the decision.
It was the first use of the Taft-Hartley Act since 1978, and the first time any US president has invoked the legislation during a management lockout. The legislation calls for a return to work and an 80-day cooling-off period.
"This has never happened in the US before," said Richard Trumke, the secretary treasurer of the AFL-CIO union. "No president has ever been on the side of management so overtly."
Explaining his decision, Mr Bush said economic damage from the dispute had spread across the country and the economy, endangering the jobs of farmers, automotive workers and others.
He also said the dispute was endangering America's security. "These ports load the ships that carry supplies to our men and women in uniform. These ports also receive parts and materials used by our defence contractors to complete projects and maintain military equipment," he said.
But labour leaders accused Mr Bush of colluding with the port operators, who locked out some 10,000 dock workers on September 29 after a deadlock in negotiations on jobs and new technology.

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- Court Orders Starbucks to Pay $105 Million Tip to Baristas
- Man Fired for Using Medical Pot Can’t Sue, Rules Top Court
- Alabama Couple Celebrate 80th Anniversary, Still in Love
- Anita Hill Stands by Her Words – Again – as Thomas Book is Released
- Mother Succeeds in Court Fight to Get Placenta Back
- Racist, Homophobic Prospective Juror Can’t Be on Jury
- "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" Loses Supreme Court Appeal
- Despite Family’s Wishes, Hospital Plans to End Baby’s Life Support
- Army Court Martial Begins for War Objector Ehren Watada
- Prosecutors: Mom Faked Son’s Retardation, Collected $111,000
- Lawyer Punished for Exclaiming "Lord" in Court
- Common-Law Marriages in Colorado May Be Valid at Age 15
- Supreme Court Hears Arguments About Assisted Suicide in Oregon
- Defiantly Unrepentant Eric Rudolph Sentenced To Life In Prison
- Supreme Court Rules Against America In Ten Commandments Displays
- Supreme Court Rules Against Rights Of Homeowners
- Supreme Court Outlaws Medical Use of Marijuana
- Supreme Court Considering Constitutionality of Ten Commandments Displays
- Destiny’s Child Destined for Court
- Stevie Wonder Sued by Ex-Girlfriend, Angela McAfee



