MLB: Revenge of the Small Market Baseball Teams
In an age of escalating baseball salaries, the Oakland A's have made the postseason with a low-budget payroll. Just because Oakland has bucked the system one year doesn't mean baseball has cured its economic disparity.
By JOE FRISARO UsFANS.com Managing Editor
Call it the Revenge of the Small Spenders.
In a made for Hollywood moment, the Oakland A’s, who hold prime real estate in baseball’s low-rent district, have won the American League West. Back in the playoffs for the first time since 1992, the A’s take on two-time defending World Series champions, the New York Yankees.
Get this, the A’s are favorites.
Hard to imagine that a team that started the season with a payroll of just over $32 million finished with a better record than the Yankees, who possess the richest roster ($112 million) ever assembled.
For at least one year, money wasn’t the single most decisive measure of a big league team. That’s a reversal from the past four or five years where all eight teams to make the postseason ranked in the top 10 or 15 in player salaries. A year ago, all the postseason squads were in the top 10.
A few frugal franchises made the cut this season. The Chicago White Sox being the other.
The A’s are the biggest surprise because a number of their stars are 25 years of age or younger.
Good for the A’s. Good for baseball, too. New blood in the postseason is always refreshing. But don’t get fooled into thinking just because the A’s are in, that the playing field in the league is now level. A few inside baseball people, those satisfied with the status quo, argue that if the A’s can do it, then the Montreal Expos, Minnesota Twins and Florida Marlins aren’t far behind.
Don’t believe it for a second. Off the field, the A’s have major issues. Their fan base has dwindled and their stadium is obsolete by modern-day standards. Proof resides across the San Francisco Bay, where state-of-the-art Pac Bell Stadium is the splendid new home of the Giants.
To keep pace financially, the A’s need bigger crowds and a better ballpark.
Prior to the season, owner Steve Schott set a goal to increase ticket sales by 20 percent. The A’s did that, but the club still isn’t happy. That’s because Oakland ranks near the bottom of the American League in attendance.
Down the stretch, the A’s averaged 17,500 over a crucial four-game home swing. Shrewd marketing gimmicks, such as $1 tickets on Wednesdays, failed to fatten the crowds.
You can imagine the elation when 45,000 packed the house to see the A’s clinch on the final day of the season.
Winning tends to heal a lot of wounds. Perhaps the A’s remarkable run in 2000 will bring back fans in greater numbers next year. It might also provide the impetus for construction of a new stadium.
For now, the A’s and their fans should enjoy the ride. There is no telling how long it will last.
Some will say Oakland’s remarkable run proves anyone can win any given year. I’m not convinced. The A’s seem to be following the same paths the Florida Marlins (1997) and the San Diego Padres (1998) traveled a few years ago. Those teams each had a miracle season, only to dismantle because they couldn’t keep pace with the rising economics of the game.
Article courtesy of UsFANS.com
Call it the Revenge of the Small Spenders.
In a made for Hollywood moment, the Oakland A’s, who hold prime real estate in baseball’s low-rent district, have won the American League West. Back in the playoffs for the first time since 1992, the A’s take on two-time defending World Series champions, the New York Yankees.
Get this, the A’s are favorites.
Hard to imagine that a team that started the season with a payroll of just over $32 million finished with a better record than the Yankees, who possess the richest roster ($112 million) ever assembled.
For at least one year, money wasn’t the single most decisive measure of a big league team. That’s a reversal from the past four or five years where all eight teams to make the postseason ranked in the top 10 or 15 in player salaries. A year ago, all the postseason squads were in the top 10.
A few frugal franchises made the cut this season. The Chicago White Sox being the other.
The A’s are the biggest surprise because a number of their stars are 25 years of age or younger.
Good for the A’s. Good for baseball, too. New blood in the postseason is always refreshing. But don’t get fooled into thinking just because the A’s are in, that the playing field in the league is now level. A few inside baseball people, those satisfied with the status quo, argue that if the A’s can do it, then the Montreal Expos, Minnesota Twins and Florida Marlins aren’t far behind.
Don’t believe it for a second. Off the field, the A’s have major issues. Their fan base has dwindled and their stadium is obsolete by modern-day standards. Proof resides across the San Francisco Bay, where state-of-the-art Pac Bell Stadium is the splendid new home of the Giants.
To keep pace financially, the A’s need bigger crowds and a better ballpark.
Prior to the season, owner Steve Schott set a goal to increase ticket sales by 20 percent. The A’s did that, but the club still isn’t happy. That’s because Oakland ranks near the bottom of the American League in attendance.
Down the stretch, the A’s averaged 17,500 over a crucial four-game home swing. Shrewd marketing gimmicks, such as $1 tickets on Wednesdays, failed to fatten the crowds.
You can imagine the elation when 45,000 packed the house to see the A’s clinch on the final day of the season.
Winning tends to heal a lot of wounds. Perhaps the A’s remarkable run in 2000 will bring back fans in greater numbers next year. It might also provide the impetus for construction of a new stadium.
For now, the A’s and their fans should enjoy the ride. There is no telling how long it will last.
Some will say Oakland’s remarkable run proves anyone can win any given year. I’m not convinced. The A’s seem to be following the same paths the Florida Marlins (1997) and the San Diego Padres (1998) traveled a few years ago. Those teams each had a miracle season, only to dismantle because they couldn’t keep pace with the rising economics of the game.
Article courtesy of UsFANS.com

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- Baseball History
- NL Teams Keep Competition Tight As Wild Card Standings Heat Up
- Columbus Stars Baseball Team Banned For Being Too Good
- Take Me Out To The Ball Game (and Could You Grab Me Some Nachos?)
- General: Arm-wrestling contest escalates into violence
- The MLB strike -- 25 years in the making
- Baseball semantics and antics
- College baseball -- Professional amateurs
- Baseball: Josh Gibson, one of baseball's greatest
- Cricket: What Cricket has and Baseball doesn't
- Baseball: Moe Hill - Midwest League superstar
- Catching playoff fever -- Southern California style
- Baseball at its best down to the wire
- Now leaving Canada...
- D.C. Baseball needs nostalgia
- General: B-Side Rumblings
- General: Former third-baseman buys own country
- Astros burn out, shining stars no longer
- General: Yallons voted most popular in Midwestern Baseball League
- Baseball: Cal Ripken, Jr. Announces Retirement
- MLB Can Quash Copyright "Offenders," but not Steroid Users
- Slugger Manny Ramirez Suspended 50 Games for Drug Violation
- Ex-Baseball Star Roberto Alomar Diagnosed with AIDS, Being Sued
- The State of Major League Baseball
- MLB Predicts Historic Night of Milestones
- Pujols’ Bat Saves The Game—Again
- Baseball: License to Deal
- Autumn Glory: Baseball’s First World Series



