Supreme Court Nominee Eases Abortion Stance
Supreme court nominee Samuel Alito yesterday attempted to mollify Democrat critics by distancing himself from a statement he made 20 years ago opposing abortion, and said he would deal with the issue with an open mind in office.
On the second day of Senate judiciary committee hearings, President George Bush's choice for America's highest court also said no president or court is above the law - even in time of war - as he addressed questions on executive powers in the wake of revelations over domestic eavesdropping by the administration.
Mr Alito, a conservative who would swing the court to the right, said his writings opposing abortion during his time as a government lawyer under Ronald Reagan in the 80s reflected an attorney representing a client's interest. If faced with an abortion case as a supreme court judge, "I would approach the question with an open mind".
Mr Alito said he agreed "that the constitution protects a right to privacy", an interpretation that underpins the supreme court's 1973 Roe v Wade ruling that legalised abortion.
However, he also defended his 1991 judicial vote that women seeking abortions must notify their husbands, telling the committee: "I did it because I thought that's what the law required."
Abortion rights groups have vehemently opposed the nomination of Mr Alito, 55.
On the second day of Senate judiciary committee hearings, President George Bush's choice for America's highest court also said no president or court is above the law - even in time of war - as he addressed questions on executive powers in the wake of revelations over domestic eavesdropping by the administration.
Mr Alito, a conservative who would swing the court to the right, said his writings opposing abortion during his time as a government lawyer under Ronald Reagan in the 80s reflected an attorney representing a client's interest. If faced with an abortion case as a supreme court judge, "I would approach the question with an open mind".
Mr Alito said he agreed "that the constitution protects a right to privacy", an interpretation that underpins the supreme court's 1973 Roe v Wade ruling that legalised abortion.
However, he also defended his 1991 judicial vote that women seeking abortions must notify their husbands, telling the committee: "I did it because I thought that's what the law required."
Abortion rights groups have vehemently opposed the nomination of Mr Alito, 55.

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- US Supreme Court Nears Crucial Abortion Ruling
- Appeal Will Test Us Supreme Court's Line on Abortion Under New Chief Justice
- Alito Would Keep 'open Mind' on Abortion
- US Abortion Ban Sets Stage for Court Battle
- Abortion Activists Rally to Refight Old Battles
- The ‘Lost’ Girls of Asia
- Determining Rational Guidelines for Abortion
- Anti-Abortion Arguments - Reasons Against Abortion
- Have You Killed Your Baby?
- Abortion Facts and Statistics
- Facts About Abortion
- What Does The Bible Say About Abortion?
- The Pill causes early abortion!
- U.S. Supreme Court Veers Right with Vote to Uphold Abortion Ban
- South Dakota Considers Banning Abortions
- Supreme Court Hears Arguments about Partial-Birth Abortion Ban
- Woman Sues Clinic Because Botched Abortion Leaves Baby Injured
- South Dakota Legislation Makes Abortions Illegal
- South Dakota Legislature Approves Ban on All Abortions
- Federal Appeals Courts Rule Against Partial Birth Abortion Ban



