| Name |
Views and Comments | Date |
| Chris Conway |
good information, thanks for passing it on |
10/31/2005 |
| Rational |
It's all pretty good but I'm not so sure about the "1 year registration penalty". The majority of sites get registered for one year only and then get renewed on an annual basis. Even though it makes sense, it sounds like speculation... remember one thing - there is no such thing as THE PERFECT site from a SEO perspctive. Each and every site will have faults and Google (hopefully) knows that! |
9/24/2005 |
| Laurie Meade |
I just discovered page rank while looking for a listing of free content article sites.
This is a very informative article. Thank you for sharing this with us.
|
9/13/2005 |
| Andy |
Hmmm. Interesting. I wonder how much my site might improve with some tweaks. Thanks! |
8/2/2005 |
| RW |
you cite that the years a domain is registered will effect the ranking of a site, but then fail to show the evidence of this in your explinations. Please clarify this point or take if off your article. |
7/21/2005 |
| maverick |
Good one.. .thanks from India!! |
7/1/2005 |
| priceit |
Don't forget what a patent is all about: protecting the technology you are about to release in the future, while making sure that you don't give away too many clues about what you are about to release. Most of the content is noise, and cannot be taken as granted. |
6/30/2005 |
| Al Bert |
Excellent |
6/30/2005 |
| Mankievitch |
they are some ranking genius out there.... Look at AMDboard in a search like Windows 64 the dude manage to be 2 right after Microsoft!
|
6/28/2005 |
| Britt |
Thank you from the Western Atlantic Ocean! |
6/20/2005 |
| FREDDY BEE |
THIS ALL SOUNDS VERY GOOD. I WILL FOLLOW THE WISDOM. |
6/17/2005 |
| Hink |
How much of this filing is actual SOP, and how much of it is misdirection and kitchensinking to throw competition, and as it would seem, idle speculators off the scent?
If you could tell me the answer to that question, I would say this is worth getting your undies in a bunch; otherwise, I'd advise a grain of salt. |
6/17/2005 |
| dittoi |
I'm getting a lot of stick for the poor grammar and spelling mistakes in this article which is fair enough. The article was written quickly to get the info out. I've just now made some amendments and I'll take some time out soon to fix any remaining errors. As for it being old news. Yes it is to some but not to the majority. A great deal of people have found it very helpful and informative. Despite the crude formatting. :) regards,
Darren Yates |
6/17/2005 |
| Plaidshark |
LOL, I did not know this was a grammer site. I think the guy was giving us the info more for content, and not that he needs to turn it in to his teacher. If everyone spelled "write" on the internet, wouldn't it be a great thing!!! lets loose all the friggin' acronyms. |
6/17/2005 |
| Plaidshark |
Great Article, and we are definately changing the way we do things now!! |
6/17/2005 |
| Beckie |
How does being listed in the Open Directory fit into Google's ranking? |
6/16/2005 |
| anon |
Darren should learn when to put an extra letter "o" on the word "to" to make "too".
He wrote: "On the other hand to few or to small updates to your site could see your rankings slide." |
6/16/2005 |
| OLD |
Sounds like a lot of guessing and non-factual information. More like opinions based on the patent that was released a while back.
OWNED |
6/16/2005 |
| Stephen |
Don't listen to these turds below--
good article |
6/16/2005 |
| JMC |
That's old news. The patent was FILED in Dec 31, 2003.
And you know that you _can_ read patent submissions, don't you ? |
6/16/2005 |
