Tiger Woods sues artist to draw a line between painting and profit

'Enormous constitutional issues at stake' as top golfer launches lawsuit. Rick Rush's paintings - faithfully reproduced great sporting scenes - might not be considered great art but no one has ever argued they're not so much art as illegal rip-offs masquerading as art.
Comments on article "Tiger Woods sues artist to draw a line between painting and profit"
Name Views and CommentsDate
Angela Horner I think an artist should have the freedom to paint whatever he wants and if it is good enough to be sold and make a profit from then good for him or her. Why not? Celebrities can't have it all their own way. They should be more graciousl to the public who are also responsible for making them into celebrities anyway 7/19/2006
BUMPA GET A LIFE TIGER,YOU MAKE YOUR MONEY PLAYING GOLF RIGHT? WELL YOUR COPYING OFF OF ALL OTHER GOLFERS.. ARE THEY SUEING YOU? RICKS USING HIS GOD GIVEN TALENT TO PROVIDE INCOME FOR HIS FAMILY, O.K.? IS THAT ALRIGHT WITH YOU OR DOES RICK NEED YOUR PERMISSION ? 6/8/2006
BUMPA WHEN MILLIONS OF NEWSPAPERS ARE SOLD EVERYDAY WITH PICTURES OF FAMOUS PEOPLE IN THEM DO THE NEWSPAPERS GET SUED? OFCOURSE NOT DUHHHHHH,,,,,,,,,, 6/8/2006
Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.
Your Comments:
Your Name:
Use the form below to email this article to your friends.
Recipient Email Address:
 Separate multiple email addresses by ;
Your Name:
Your Email Address: