| Name |
Views and Comments | Date |
| kasander |
Lerakas, go get a life |
8/29/2008 |
| Ierakas |
There is nothing to answer nazi-turkey, "mein kampf" megalommatis!
You haven't said anything till now. The only thing that I can say is that you are unable to answer to my comments in a civilized way and this is another proof of your ignorance-and of course sample of your iq!
And I dare you to answer if you can, turkommatis. But you can't. |
4/15/2008 |
| MSMegalommatis |
And do not bother to answer this Neo-Nazi, pseudo-Greek 'ierakas'. |
4/14/2008 |
| Ierakas |
The skopian republic cannot recognise kossovo because they know what will happen to Tetovo.
. |
4/6/2008 |
| MSMegalommatis |
Bluerose799, you are absolutely right; there is no reason for fear to recognize Kosova. |
4/5/2008 |
| Ierakas |
Republic of skopjie will not be part of NATO with a stolen name.
Period
|
4/2/2008 |
| Ierakas |
You can't guess turkommatis because you are a janissar. Better try to find some answers than proving that you are an ignorant.
Or even better continue answering in the same arrogant and ignorant way.
Another source: Palestinian Refugees
Author: Naseer Aruri
Pluto Press 2001
ISBN 0 7453 1777 4
Page 22
It is no less true that there was a widespread Jewish diaspora in the
Hellenistic period that was altogether unrelated to expulsion. Voluntary
emigration of Jews from Palestine into the cities of the 'civilized world' was widespread, and there is evidence of Jewish communities outside Palestine long before Alexander the Great. Alexander himself encouraged the foundation of new cities and invited new settlers on whom he bestowed various privileges and even citizenship. Jews answered the call in considerable numbers, going to Syria, Egypt and other newly founded Hellenistic cities.
It was not a new idea. Ten years before Alexander was even born, the veteran Athenian pamphleteer Isocrates had published an "Address to Philip," calling for a Panhellenic crusade against Persia under Philip's leadership. Even before that, the various Greek city-states had discussed such a crusade, one which would avenge Xerxes' invasion of a century and a half earlier. The Greeks had forgotten neither the sacrileges committed against the temples of their gods nor the humiliating settlement that had ceded the Hellenic cities of Asia Minor to Persia's "Great King."
Continue to be rude and arrogant. An idiot can't be more than that. |
4/2/2008 |
| bluerose799 |
One in four Macedonian, speak Albanian language. That means Albanians are a minority there. After separation from former YGOSLAVIA, Macedonia is Building up a new Capitalistic Democratic Nation. While their language, culture, and rights are recognized, they are living normal life side by side with Slavic majority of Macedonia.
Slavic Socialism of Serbia, have killed hundred thousands and Displaced millions of Croatian, Bosnian and Kosovars. They failed and are paying their price. Many of Serbian that fled Croatia, Bosnia and Kosova, if they will return, might be in title to be Detained, Trailed and Punished, if they will be found guilty. Keep in mind that the Serbian people made massive and horrible crimes, and many of them are not punished yet.
There is no way for any parallel between Serbian and Macedonians.
There is no reason for fear to recognize Kosova .
|
4/2/2008 |
| MSMegalommatis |
Hollow replies, empty words and misinterpreted texts by an unbalanced and uneducated person who ridicules his country!
The Greeks must truly hate you, I guess! |
4/1/2008 |
| Ierakas |
It is the utterly idiotism to accuse somebody whom you don't know and he has just expressed his positive opinion for Israel as "personally the worst enemy of Judaism" but this is exactly what pseudo-dr megalommatis is.
You are trying to change again the discussion because you are still unable to answer my comments.
Your memory and apprehension problems will not be your alibi turkommatis. Don't expect a discussion for Cyprus since you are unable to answer my comments for Macedonia.
And if you want to see anti-semitism look at the muslim government of yours. Also, look at the bombings of two synagogues in Konstantinoupolis, Turkey, on November 15, 2003. 23 killed. 260 wounded.
For one more time, for the alzheimer sufferer pseudo-dr megalommatis:
From the jewish encyclopedia. By : Isaac Broydé Kaufmann Kohler Israel Lévi
"And when the Book of Daniel was shown him [see Dan. vii. 6, viii. 5-8, 20-22, xi. 3-4], wherein Daniel declared that one of the Greeks [] should destroy the empire of the Persians, he supposed that he was the person intended, and rejoiced thereat.
Any answers turkommatis why Alexander rejoiced when he saw that ONE OF THE GREEKS WILL DESTROY THE EMPIRE OF THE PERSIANS AND WHY HE SUPPOSED THAT HE IS THE PERSON HIMSELF since according to you he was not Greek?
Answer turkommati and don't try to say that I am anti-semitic because you are even more ludicrous. Personally speaking I have many good friends who are Jewish and I had major support from other Jewish people. |
3/30/2008 |
| MSMegalommatis |
Greece has always been anti-Semitic, and you personally are the worst enemy of Judaism.
No one thinks that you believe what you are publishing!
The lies of the Anti-Semites last very little time.
What about the Israeli ships sailing from Haifa to the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus? |
3/30/2008 |
| Ierakas |
Using more sources from our Jewish friends we continue:
From the jewish encyclopedia. By : Isaac Broydé Kaufmann Kohler Israel Lévi
"And when the Book of Daniel was shown him [see Dan. vii. 6, viii. 5-8, 20-22, xi. 3-4], wherein Daniel declared that one of the Greeks [] should destroy the empire of the Persians, he supposed that he was the person intended, and rejoiced thereat.
Any answers turkommatis why Alexander rejoiced when he saw that ONE OF THE GREEKS WILL DESTROY THE EMPIRE OF THE PERSIANS AND WHY HE SUPPOSED THAT HE IS THE PERSON HIMSELF since according to you he was not Greek?
Go on and answer with more swearing. Swearing is easy and that's why illiterate people always resort to insults.
I will remind to you for one more time since it seems that you have memory problems along with the apprehension ones:
One always speaks badly when one has nothing to say.
--Voltaire
. |
3/29/2008 |
| Ierakas |
For sure Ierakas is FAR better than a TURKEY no matter what this illiterate turkey believes.
So far you are unable to answer to my comments so it is obvious that you have severe apprehension problems and you are not at all a prof, you pseudo-dr. The rest of your insults for "idiots" etc can therefore be returned easily to this unsuccessful clerical worker, the well UKNOWN turkommatis!
I will continue to give historical proofs ignoring your ...ignorance, turkommatis.
ALEXANDER AND THE HEBREW ARCHPRIESTS
Around 70 A.D. the Hebrew historian Josepus Flavious (Hebrew Archeology, Ch. A 329) states that after the conquest of Tyre and the siege of Gaza, Alexander the Great visited Jerusalem, where right at the entrance of the city he was greeted by the Hebrew Archpriest, Simon the Just, accompanied by other Jewish priests and a multitude of people. Alexander descended his horse and went to greet the Jewish Archpriest. Parmenion, Alexander's General, approached him and advised Alexander that his soldiers are displeased that he rushed first to greet the Jewish Priest. Alexander however, answered, "I did not greet the Archpriest, but the God he represents". Following the Archpriest's indication, Alexander carried out a religious sacrifice at the Temple of Solomon and allowed the Hebrews of Jerusalem and other Jewish states to use their paternal religious rites. Alexander's act set an original pattern of respect for religious freedom, in an era that such a behavior was totally unprecedented.
However, when Alexander asked the Archpriest for his statue or his portrait to be placed at Solomon's Temple, the Archpriest responded that the God of the Jewish has ordered them that no statues or any other icons should be placed in the Temple. Nonetheless he assured Alexander, "We will do something that will remain in eternity. All the male children that will be born this year to priests and the descendants of the Levi clan, will receive your name, they will be named Alexander". According to the Talmud (the Jewish religious text of the Rabbis and the religious Rabbi schools) "this is how the name "Alexander" entered the Hebrew society in commemoration of the Great Greek General and it continues to be used for generation after generation". Let it be noted that many Hebrew individuals bear even to these days the name Alexander. The admission of Alexander's name into the genealogy of the Jewish community gave Alexander a divine quality and thus the Hellenic intellect and knowledge in close contact with the world of Revelation, prepared the ground for the expansion of Christianity.
An additional event that verifies the close ties of the Macedonian Greeks with the Jews is the following: When the three Wise Men, while going to Bethlehem, arrived in Jerusalem, they exchanged the currency of their fatherland with local cash. Most of the local money that they used was coins with Greek writings and on one side. They depicted Hercules' head (forefather of the Macedonian kings) and on the other side an eagle, symbol of the Selefkid Greeks of Syria. This was the official currency in Judaia until Christ's years and this kind of currency was also accepted in the Jewish temples.
According to Constantine Paparrigopoulos, the word Synagogue, which is Greek, dates back, probably to the command that Alexander gave, relating to freedom of various Jewish gatherings. Also the annual Hebrew Convention that used to take place in Jerusalem was called "Synitrins", from the Greek word Συνέδριο.
. |
3/29/2008 |
| MSMegalommatis |
All that you say is useless trash collected by an ignorant unable to interpret and analyze.
You are very idiotic if you think that,by referring to sources you cannot understand and interpret as a Historian, you possibly "prove" anything!
Little idiot!
Ierakas turned out a lame duck! |
3/29/2008 |
| MSMegalommatis |
More you say more ridiculous you prove to be! |
3/28/2008 |
| Ierakas |
Your new paranoid, irrelevant to the previous discussion comment, proves the obvious fact from your CV: You are an unsuccessful clerical worker without any relationship to universities and academic career.
You will not escape turko-madis just because you are unable to answer.
I really enjoy showing the truth and on the other side I see an ignorant turkomati who tried to mumble something about Demosthenes and after that he realised that history is on the Greek side and simply stoped the discussion going back to insults.
THAT'S WHAT DR JEKYL-MEGALOMMATIS IS!
Your ignorance and rudeness offer a major service to Greece.
Even a janissar can be useful if you know how to use him!
Thanks janisssar turkomatis! |
3/27/2008 |
| MSMegalommatis |
An ignorant who never entered in a University - Dept of History: this what you are! |
3/27/2008 |
| Ierakas |
You are saying bonkers and you know that. First of all this discussion is not at all related to the words of Alexander or probably you admit that Alexander and Macedonians were Greeks and you want to discuss something totally different. That's fine with me.
So, for the new discussion about the Greek emperors of Byzantium who wanted to establish a new religion. Many times in the history there were civil wars for religions and for power. When the greek communist fought against the Greek government, both of them were Greek. This was a mistake in the Greek history that I admit and I learn from that. I don't spit on that; I only spit on JANISSARS who are fighting against their country.
It is ridiculous to say that since I am Christian I have to accept all the crimes of christianity. This is actually your problem, turkommatis, since you can't admit the genocides of the ottoman empire and the turks who are responsible for many genocides.
No turkommatis, christianity means love and forgiveness. The crimes of those emperors are well-known and I don't have to agree with them. I know how to accept all the good and the bad sides of the GREEK history. I disagree with the distruction of Persepolis by Alexander but it is still MY history.
Go to the archeology museum in Konstantinoupolis to learn something: Anatolia in the times of Alexander the great: HELLENISTIC TIMES. |
3/26/2008 |
| MSMegalommatis |
During the 4th and teh 5th centuries, and even as late as 800 CE, Christians and Christian emperors slaughtered the followers of ancient religions, Greek included.
The historical reality contradicts your ignorance and your barbaric pseudo-identity.
Saying all you said means you are not Greek, you are not Christian, and in fact you are nothing. And this is clear to you as well. |
3/26/2008 |
| Ierakas |
First of all these are words of Alexander and not mine and I don't have any megalo...maniac psychopathy to try to find similarities with significant persons like...Sartre!
Anyway...Alexander as ancient Greek believed in the Olympian Gods and this is another proof of his nationality-along with all others. If one of my ancestors was pagan, muslim or whatever else from the available religions I wouldn't bother at all and of course I wouldn't spit on him because of his religion. I am Christian and Christianity means love and acceptance of different religions.
For one more time, the fact that Alexander counted as his progenitors the Greeks Dionysos and Hercules proves his nationality: GREEK |
3/25/2008 |
| MSMegalommatis |
If Dionysos were the progenitor of your family, you would simply have to spit over your ancestor, denouncing the polytheistic and idolatrous character of his Satanism, as you have accepted Christianity. |
3/25/2008 |
| Ierakas |
Jean Paul Sartre was not a Janissar and don't try to find a nationality this way, turkommatis!
Again to help your apprehension problem, although I used capital letters to help people with those problems:"TO PUSH THE BOUNDS OF MACEDONIA TO THE FARTHEST OCEAN, AND TO DISSEMINATE AND SHOWER THE BLESSINGS OF HELLENIC JUSTICE and peace over every nation, I should not be content to sit quietly in the luxury of idle power, but I should emulate the frugality of Diogenes. But as things are, forgive me Diogenes, that I imitate Herakles, and emulate Perseus, and follow in the footsteps of Dionysos, the divine author and progenitor of my family, and DESIRE THAT VICTORIOUS HELLENES SHOULD DANCE AGAIN in India"
Look: DISSEMINATE AND SHOWER THE BLESSINGS OF HELLENIC JUSTICE and peace over every nation
I imitate Herakles, and emulate Perseus, and follow in the footsteps of Dionysos, the divine author and PROGENITOR OF MY FAMILY
DESIRE THAT VICTORIOUS HELLENES SHOULD DANCE AGAIN in India
If you can't understand those clear words of Alexander for Hellenic justice and peace, for the progenitors of his family and the victorious Hellenes then you clearly need English courses and I would suggest them fairly urgently!
I wouldn't like to express my feelings for the totally inappropriate use of the name of Jean Paul Sartre from some...megalommatis! |
3/24/2008 |
| MSMegalommatis |
Wonderful idiocy!
If I were not Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis, I should be Jean Paul Sartre!
And this proves that Sartre was not ........ French! |
3/24/2008 |
| Ierakas |
What Alexandros believed for himself?
"But he said, ‘If I were not Alexandros, I should be Diogenes’; that is to say: `If it were not my purpose to combine barbarian things with things HELLENIC, to traverse and civilize every continent, to search out the uttermost parts of land and sea, TO PUSH THE BOUNDS OF MACEDONIA TO THE FARTHEST OCEAN, AND TO DISSEMINATE AND SHOWER THE BLESSINGS OF HELLENIC JUSTICE and peace over every nation, I should not be content to sit quietly in the luxury of idle power, but I should emulate the frugality of Diogenes. But as things are, forgive me Diogenes, that I imitate Herakles, and emulate Perseus, and follow in the footsteps of Dionysos, the divine author and progenitor of my family, and DESIRE THAT VICTORIOUS HELLENES SHOULD DANCE AGAIN in India […]" [Plutarch’s Moralia, On the Fortune of Alexander, 332A (Loeb, F.C Babbitt)
No matter what some turkommatis believe today, Alexander himself proudly declared that he was Greek. |
3/23/2008 |
| Ierakas |
And since according to yourself the most important is what one believes for himself and not what the others believe for him, read what Philip himself believed for his nationality:
For on many occasions when I AND THE OTHER GREEKS sent embassies to you begging you to remove from your statutes the law empowering you to get booty from booty, you replied that you would rather remove Aetolia from Aetolia than that law
[Polyvius, 18.4.8]
Clear things: I and the other Greeks. No matter what you THINK that Demosthenes said.
|
3/23/2008 |
| Ierakas |
As you can see turkommatis, in the four quotes, the one was supporting the Greekness of the Macedonians, the second was totally irrelevant and the other two was explained by you in a wrong way. |
3/23/2008 |
| Ierakas |
Using your "arguments":
From Philippic II, 2:
On the contrary, the condition of public affairs as a whole has already been brought to a point at which, the more and the more evidently a speaker can convict Philip both of transgressing the Peace which he made with you and of plotting against all the Hellenes, the harder it is for him to advise you how you should act.
Really? Again this comprehenson problem of yours I presume. Does the phrase "against all the Hellenes" means that Macedonians were not Greek? Do you think that Thebans were Greeks turkommatis? If yes, then thanks for reading the following:
Plutarchos, Agis 14
Quote:
Since the Lakedaimonians made peace with all the Hellenes,
they were in war only with the Thebans…
So does this mean that Thebans were not Hellenes?
Poor turkommatis with apprehension problems.
Again, don't look so desperate to find a text that you don't understand and you think that it says that Macedonians were not Greeks. Try to find ONE proof that ancient Macedonians were...slavs! Slavs came to the area 1000 years after the death of Alexander.
|
3/23/2008 |
| Ierakas |
Again using your "arguments:
From Philippic II,11-12:
He knows, on the other hand, how the forefathers of the Thebans and Argives, in the one case, joined the barbarian army, in the other, offered no resistance to it. 12 He knows, therefore, that both these peoples will welcome what is to their own advantage, instead of considering the common interests of the Hellenes
Do you have difficulty to understand the word "barbarian"? If an prator calls somebody barbarian does this makes him ...non-Hellen?
Then in your "logic" Demosthenes was not Greek since he was himself called barbarian from Aeschines. Aeschines calls Demosthenes a ‘Barbarian’ while addressing to him "On the Embassy 2 183"Aeschines,Quote:
A word more and I have done. One thing was in my power, fellow citizens: to do you no wrong. But to be free from accusation, that was a thing which depended upon fortune, and fortune cast my lot with a slanderer, a barbarian, who cared not for sacrifices nor libations nor the breaking of bread together; nay, to frighten all who in time to come might oppose him, he has fabricated a false charge against us and come in here. If, therefore, you are willing to save those who have laboured together with you for peace and for your security, the common good will find champions in abundance, ready to face danger in your behalf.
Here Aeschines when attempting to refute Demosthenes’ accusations, clearly titles him a "barbarian" that "fabricated a false charge" against him
Poor turkommatis, even Demosthenes clearly accepted ALexander as Hellen:
25. Callisthenes of Olynthus 2.4.7-8; Oration of Demosthenes
"No king of the Hellenes had ever conquered Egypt with the exception only of Alexander, and that he did without war"
|
3/23/2008 |
| Ierakas |
I use your own arguments:
From Philippic II, 20:
'Can you not imagine,' I said, 'men of Messenia, the impatience with which the Olynthians used to listen to any speeches directed against Philip in those times, when he was giving up Anthemus to them—a city claimed as their own by all former Macedonian kings; when he was expelling the Athenian colonists from Poteidaea and presenting it to the Olynthians; when he had taken upon his own shoulders their quarrel with Athens, and given them the enjoyment of that territory? Did they expect, do you think, to suffer as they have done? if any one had foretold it, would they have believed him?
WHERE DOES THIS SAY THAT MACEDONIANS WERE NOT GREEKS? HERE DEMOSTHENES SPEAKS FOR PHILIP AS THE ENEMY OF ATHENS. HE WANTED ATHENS TO BE HEGEMONIC CITY IN GREECE AND NOT MACEDONIA.
AGAIN: Where is the evedence of the ridiculous claim that Macedonians were...slavs?
Nowhere! |
3/23/2008 |
| Ierakas |
Yes! Turkommatis try to use Demosthenes as a historian! Hillarious attempt, because Demosthenes was an ortator and not a historian and mainly, he HIMSELF HAS SPOKEN FOR THE GREEKNESS OF MACEDONIANS:
.....If Alexandros has become full of himself and wishes to be a warrior, and subjugate barbarian peoples why do we follow him? Let him move on alone and engage in wars. Having heard these Alexander separated the Persian host from the MACEDONIANS AND THE OTHER HELLENES and addressed them..." [2.4.7-8; Oration of Demosthenes]
Even in your "argment":From Philippic II, 8:
there was no attraction that he could offer, nothing that he could do, which would induce you to sacrifice any OF THE OTHER Hellenes to him for your own advantage.
You have a comprehensipon problem turkommatis: It is clear : NAY OF THE OTHER HELLENES TO THE HELLEN PHILLIP.
Thanks turkommatis.
And more:
"Even though Xerxes had a huge host with him, he was a barbarian and was defeated by the prudence of the Hellenes; whereas Alexander the Hellene has already engaged in 13 battles and has not been defeated once."
[2.3.4.-5; Oration of Demosthenes]
|
3/23/2008 |
| MSMegalommatis |
From Philippic II, 2:
On the contrary, the condition of public affairs as a whole has already been brought to a point at which, the more and the more evidently a speaker can convict Philip both of transgressing the Peace which he made with you and of plotting against all the Hellenes, the harder it is for him to advise you how you should act.
From Philippic II, 8:
there was no attraction that he could offer, nothing that he could do, which would induce you to sacrifice any of the other Hellenes to him for your own advantage.
From Philippic II,11-12:
He knows, on the other hand, how the forefathers of the Thebans and Argives, in the one case, joined the barbarian army, in the other, offered no resistance to it. 12 He knows, therefore, that both these peoples will welcome what is to their own advantage, instead of considering the common interests of the Hellenes
From Philippic II, 20:
'Can you not imagine,' I said, 'men of Messenia, the impatience with which the Olynthians used to listen to any speeches directed against Philip in those times, when he was giving up Anthemus to them—a city claimed as their own by all former Macedonian kings; when he was expelling the Athenian colonists from Poteidaea and presenting it to the Olynthians; when he had taken upon his own shoulders their quarrel with Athens, and given them the enjoyment of that territory? Did they expect, do you think, to suffer as they have done? if any one had foretold it, would they have believed him? |
3/23/2008 |
| Ierakas |
And I have many more from Demosthenes and NOT ONLY.
Again, is there any historical proof that Macedonians were slav?
Even ONE turkommatis! |
3/23/2008 |
| Ierakas |
Ha, ha! I knew it! Now we start the REAL thing. You want Demosthenes turkommatis?
Here you are:
Callisthenes of Olynthus 2.4.7-8; Oration of Demosthenes
"No king of the Hellenes had ever conquered Egypt with the exception only of Alexander, and that he did without war"
King of Hellenes Demosthenes. Clear?
You mustn't see only the exacerbation of the hatred o Demosthenis but also you should see what he was saying in more ...calm moments.
|
3/23/2008 |
| MSMegalommatis |
Demosthenes revealed how different from the Greeks the Macedonians were.
This is the historical truth, and it is quite enough! |
3/23/2008 |
| Ierakas |
There isn't such a country in the UN list of countries.
Macedonia: Northern province of Greece, Capital: Thessaloniki.
4000 years now. Macedonia was, still is and always will be part of Greece. |
3/22/2008 |
| MSMegalommatis |
The Republic of Macedonia - Capital: Skopje |
3/22/2008 |
| Ierakas |
In one word Macedonia, the north province of Greece.
I agree.
Seems you got reasonable eventually! |
3/22/2008 |
| MSMegalommatis |
Macedonia.
In one word: Macedonia |
3/22/2008 |
| Ierakas |
Macedonia! Crete! Peloponesos! Epiros! Thrace! Cyclades! Dodekanisa! Eptanisa!
IN ONE WORD: GREECE! |
3/22/2008 |
| MSMegalommatis |
Macedonia |
3/22/2008 |
| Ierakas |
I don't remember calling myself names but I remember an idiot proclaiming himself human being and prof/dr despite the fact that his CV shows that he is an unsuccesful clerical worker and his behaviour and suggestions for nuclear bombong and fascistic opinions like "silence to all the rest" show that he is probably far-far away from being a human being too.
You are also incabable to understand that every nation has to respect the right of other nations well-established the last 4000 years with historical proofs and whoever wants to create a new nation he has to find a name first and start the creation of his history after that.
Macedonia is Greek the last 4000 years.
Simple truth and you are unable to say anything against it.
The slavoskopians will find soon their position in history: East part will go to Bulgaria and west to albania. The south part is Greek and Monasteri will be Greek again soon.
Now, go on and call me names again, you rudomatis! |
3/22/2008 |
| MSMegalommatis |
You are a self-proclaimed idiot who is born incapacitated to realize that every nation and state have the right to identify themselves as they want.
Macedonia - and silence to all the rest. |
3/22/2008 |
| Ierakas |
Again this self-proclaimed "human being" strted swearing and speaking badly.
I told you:
One always speaks badly when one has nothing to say.
The United Nations is the most important organisation and the name of this slavoalbanic mongrel is clearly written: fyrom.
Actually is THE fyrom. Just after Tatzikistan.
If there was anyone interested in your boring monologues he would be able to see who is defaming. You cannot defame yourself because you have no fame, you cannot defame a country because janissars do no have a country.
I don't defame my country, the country I love and I will always support with strong and scientific arguments. Actually, the fact that you are unable to answer and you just speak badly proves that I am right. |
3/21/2008 |
| MSMegalommatis |
Only for crazy, trashy, monarcho-fascist Greeks who defame Greece allover the world. |
3/21/2008 |
| Ierakas |
Skopjie is the capital of the country named after a former yugoslavian province. The name is fyrom. |
3/21/2008 |
| MSMegalommatis |
Skopje is the capital of the state named Macedonia. Period. |
3/20/2008 |
| Ierakas |
Useless to repeat it again: there is NO country Macedonia and will never be because Macedonia is the Northern province of Greece.
Macedonians are the Greks who live in this area.
If you mean the skopian republic fyrom there is NO alliance between this country and Albania and that's why kossovo is still not recognised by fyrom |
3/20/2008 |
|
