| Name |
Views and Comments | Date |
| guy |
young girls everywhere are becoming more interested in sexual things at younger ages... it is a fact that girls start masturbating at age 4-5. so unless they specifically say NO to being touched or anything sexual then there is nothing wrong with it. they feel they are being bad cause stupid parents beat it into their heads that it is bad! |
8/31/2009 |
| HTML |
I think child pornography is very diffirent from child erotica. Child erotica is a pretty artistic thing, showing us the beauty of the future while pornography is explioting the youth, and wrong. |
4/29/2009 |
| randy |
Isn't this what"s all about? I mean, young women of legal age dressing and pretending to look and appear really young? Why do you think that is? That's what men want, they would approach kids if it weren;t illegal! Their mouth's say one thing while in their minds they really want a girl who can't grow pubic hair yet...Why does a lot of women shave their pubic regions? Look at all the porn on the internet! |
3/7/2009 |
| Joni |
when the molester comes to be interested in children and sexuality, isn't it better that he explores his sexuality online, instead of in reality.. I think that's the real order of these things..
Myself I've been into a lot of different kinds of porn, and over the years my sexual activity has then lessened, as I've explored the areas I've been interested in.. I masturbate a lot less now than as I was younger, real sex I haven't had, age 24.
The interest to anything unusual, like Pregnant women in porn, which was more persistent than many other fetishes, usually wears out quite fast.. and when you've had the chance and courage to see what you was interested of, you'll then return to the normal, soft porn, for me.. it is when you don't have the possibility to safely explore your fantasies that you'll turn to the desperate means like child-abuse.. |
1/16/2009 |
| Blank |
Stop being a bunch of hippies, this isn't bad.
Atleast the children aren't getting raped like in child porn, its just art, theres nothing wrong with it, I bet the kids aren't forced to do it. |
8/25/2008 |
| T. |
I'm sorry.
After reveiwing what i said, it seemed... uncouth.
I am a very active member of an online organization to catch paedophiles; but as an artist, the nude form is a useful tool and a wonderful form of expression. |
7/29/2008 |
| T. |
two things.
1- some of that stuff should be classified as art. not the overly erotic stuff, but still...
2- the human body is wonderful. so long as its sanctity is kept intact, and treated with respect, it should be shared. |
7/29/2008 |
| wowie |
I'm pretty sure 525 voters that are saying yes are your child molesters in the society. How can you say thats art, which is very obvious that is sick. why don't you picture your young daughter doing what thay are doing and see if you still feel that child erotica is art. |
6/17/2008 |
| Kristie |
this is absolutely horrid. I can not believe you discusting people. People like you are why kids have to watch all the time. It's terrible you think it's ok that a seven year old is thonged. You should be ashamed of youselves. |
4/18/2008 |
| Anonymous |
I think that it's sick that people actually think child erotica is acceptable. |
4/15/2008 |
| Jamer |
Child porn is the best i dont want 2 look that.had sex like 100 time preteen is hot and it look sooo good |
4/9/2008 |
| Mother of 4 |
i watched the same program. the girl wasn't 7, she was 12 or 13. never-the-less i was VERY disturbed by it! |
4/1/2008 |
| todd meuir |
You freaks are nothing but pure simian throwbacks that feed upon lives of innocent children to sate your evil . Pedophiles will creep into every crevice of excuse in order to justify what is their so called right to rape children whether it be visually or physically. |
2/29/2008 |
| Jeb |
totaly a sickness....end of story |
2/12/2008 |
| am |
it's completly wrong, if people that are visiting these web sites have children, would they allow them to posse for these sites? |
11/15/2007 |
| Ben |
I think it's sick and twisted to use innocent children used in this way . All it is , is a way to please pedophiles in a so called " Leagal" way . I don't understand how this is continued to go on . Where are the parents ? Where are the family memebers ? Why does it takes laws to put a stop to something that common sense should have ?!! I'm not saying there shouldn't be ......Just that , there shouldn't be a question to wheather this is sick or not . Bottom Line , Child Erotica ,child modeling or whatever you want to call it should be STOPPED AND THE CHILDREN SHOUD BE GIVING BACK THEIR CHILDHOOD . |
11/6/2007 |
| Clinton |
Child erotica is a part of classic art. Paintings, drawings, sculpture: they are all known to depict the child as an erotic being. The only things wrong with that are those who insist those things are bad. |
10/24/2007 |
| Jessie |
This is very true, oddly enough these men that want these kind of things aren't really hiding...the other day I was messaged and a 38 year old wanted to "cyber" with me even after knowing my age. I don't think that there will ever be a way to stop this kind of thing...as long as someone can prove that this is a form of artistic expression...it will continue on. |
8/9/2007 |
| bobby carter |
i think it's really stupid to do that to a child |
7/24/2007 |
| gijoe |
I think its one of those grey areas for police to act on. I also think it should start at the parents who let the children get the pictures done by these people |
7/23/2007 |
