Defining "Not tested on animals"

Testing of chemicals and consumer products accounts for roughly 10 to 20 percent of the use of animals in laboratories (or approximately two to four million animals yearly) in the U.S.
Comments on article "Defining "Not tested on animals""
Name Views and CommentsDate
Marissa Neal Animal testing is very mean. YOu would not like to be put in a burner so why do it to them. 12/1/2009
RRRANDA Anonymous,If you think it's right to kill innocent creatures. Then YOU should be tested on and see how THAT feels! D: 11/23/2009
Randa Animal Testing is torture and NEEDS to STOP!
If doctors can save lives then why can't we help save THEIR's?!?!?!		 11/23/2009
Randa This information is GREAT & helps me with a LOT of my school work!
Thank You. :)		 11/23/2009
APPLE BOTTOM JE aniaml testing is HORRIBLE! 5/19/2009
KASI i know it helps us but we want to help animals to So FIND SOMETHING DIFFERENT TO TEST ON 4/14/2009
Kasi i think u should not do research b/c what if u were an animal and we tested on you have you ever thought about that DONT DO TESTING IT'S CURLE 4/14/2009
Anonymous Yeah we could put the shampoo on their body, but if it wasn't tested on other animals before, there could be a possibility it would hurt them anyways, but since it was tested we know it is safe to use and no other animals will be harmed. (If any were harmed at all) 4/2/2009
anonymous In my opinion we should test on animals. We really have no other alternative, except humans. Thanks to animal testing we have saved millions of lives. Yes there have been a few mistakes, but mistakes happen, and they're going to happen wether we test on animals or not. 4/2/2009
me i dont like animal testing 4/2/2009
Katherine If you want to love the animal instead of hurting them you can clean them with the shapoo and conditioner not put in there ears or anywhere else unless ON there BODY! 10/20/2008
Itachi they shouldn't test on animals they should test on prisoners because they're already in trouble
 4/30/2008
Lucy D. Cyn - there are scientific ways to do tests. They would never test on humans - thats my point. They can use cells and technology - its just more expensive. 1/31/2008
Lucy D. I think that this needs to stop. It is savage and we would never do it to humans. 1/31/2008
cyn if products aren't tested on animals, then who should they be tested on...i'm not putting myself up for that job... 9/7/2007
Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.
Your Comments:
Your Name:
Use the form below to email this article to your friends.
Recipient Email Address:
 Separate multiple email addresses by ;
Your Name:
Your Email Address: