Defining "Not tested on animals"

Testing of chemicals and consumer products accounts for roughly 10 to 20 percent of the use of animals in laboratories (or approximately two to four million animals yearly) in the U.S.
Comments on article "Defining "Not tested on animals""
Name Views and CommentsDate
Itachi they shouldn't test on animals they should test on prisoners because they're already in trouble
 4/30/2008
Lucy D. Cyn - there are scientific ways to do tests. They would never test on humans - thats my point. They can use cells and technology - its just more expensive. 1/31/2008
Lucy D. I think that this needs to stop. It is savage and we would never do it to humans. 1/31/2008
cyn if products aren't tested on animals, then who should they be tested on...i'm not putting myself up for that job... 9/7/2007
Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.
Your Comments:
Your Name:
Use the form below to email this article to your friends.
Recipient Email Address:
 Separate multiple email addresses by ;
Your Name:
Your Email Address: