Who does not want Turkey in Iraq?

Simple comparison of advantages and disadvantages would be enough for military headquarters specialists, political analysts, diplomatic experts, journalists and average public to understand.

Iraq’s neighbors are the following:

Kuwait – an insignificant, semi-barbaric, analphabetic sheikhdom where only recently a woman was allowed to be sworn-in as minister (20 June 2005). Confusion spreading TV channels (like the notorious epicenter of disinformation BBC: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4085486.stm) failed to remind their naïve audience that the minister in question wears hedjab (Islamic veil), so she could eventually be one of the many wives of Ossama bin Laden or any other terrorist. She could even be a female terrorist! Her nomination was not a success for Democracy in the Middle East, it was a disaster for Humanism. This would be enough for Kuwait, a miniscule country that came to existence only because of the British colonial plans against the Ottoman empire. The country that was invaded by Saddam Hussein has no credentials to participate in any possible positive development in Iraq.

Jordan – an otherwise minor country, with the local population having long become a minority among the Palestinian immigrants. This perhaps does not say much to American audience as in America the conditions prevail for a fruitful and constructive assimilation of numerous immigrants. But take a break and think:
- how New Zeeland would be after a massive immigration of let’s say 10 million Indonesians? How present day New Zealanders would find themselves, if turned to a minority within their own country? In this regard, it should be taken into consideration that the Palestinian immigrants currently represent almost 70% of Jordan’s entire population!
- what would be left of Denmark, if 12 million Poles immigrated and settled in this Scandinavian country? Probably nothing!
So, this is the so-called country of Jordan: a false country created out of undesired developments for the local, long tyrannized people, who did not have access to the world’s media to express how much they hate, how much they suffer from, how much they do not want to live with, how much they want to get rid of the ‘imported’ Palestinians. As a non-country, Jordan survived only because its funny bogus-kings (whose tribal ancestors have been pitilessly murdered at the hands of the barbaric forebears of the Saudi family) were necessary to the British colonial manipulation plans that involved defeat from Israel, followed by passive acceptance of the Jewish state, opposition to Syria and Iraq, and facilitation of plots of all sorts. Americans stepped in last, but did not change the rules.

It is quite indicative that the current ‘king’ of Jordan felt obliged to get married with a Palestinian street girl, the so-called queen Rania, who could otherwise have exploded herself in the streets of Tel Aviv. Her Palestinian origin gives some legitimacy to this little chieftain of Abdallah, who knows very well that, if we take into consideration the Palestinian origin population proportion among the Jordanian citizens, he is actually not a king but prince consort, nothing more than a royal consort of his wife’s! So, Jordan is not an entity that has any qualifications to have a say whenever it comes to Iraq.

Yet, few understand in the West that, if we take the Iraqi Sunni discourses into consideration, we should admit that the Iraqis are happier than the real Jordanians, because the Iraqis at least ‘revolt’ against the ‘foreign invaders’ (the Americans and their allies) but the Jordanians have no chance to rebel against the occupying forces of their own country, namely the Palestinians. This is the unknown of the oppressed people of Jordan that turned out to be a cemetery of its own people.

Saudi Arabia – the darkest, sickest, filthiest realm in the world, the most unethical, the most murderous, the most inhuman country on earth. Not a single mentally healthy person could understand the reasons for which this area and the prevailing thugs of the desert have been allowed to participate in the UN. This is the unique country in the world where a woman is not allowed to watch a movie or attend a theatrical piece if male actors are playing. Women are not even allowed to drive a car, but male teenagers are, and this is the reason homosexuality in Saudi Arabia is attested among more than 90% of its ‘male’ population. All this happens because laws that do not emanate from the ill-perceived and largely misinterpreted Sharia of the past but originate from modern practices are never respected, let alone enforced.

Saudi Arabia is the realm of hysterical hatred of the ‘Other’ – whoever he/she may be, Ignorance, and Tenebrous Inhumanity. Human Rights violations are incommensurable, they occur very moment.

The country has been established after an unprecedented bloodshed occurred in order to allow the Saudi obscurantist and pedophiliac murderers; Britain is largely responsible for this, and the UK authorities have still to offer apologies and regret for this bleak page of the World History. The Saudi thugs were supported by the British (treaty of December 1915) to butcher the Meccan religious authorities (Mecca 1925 events), who were right in not offering them any credentials of political and religious legitimacy. Only the deposed Sultan could be source of religious and political legitimacy throughout the Islamic world; pathetic English politicians, diplomats, statesmen and agents idiotically thought it was possible for Britain to shape a decision in this regard, and favor its supposed puppets (against the Rashidis in 1922)!

The only decision the British influenced in Arabia, namely the imposition of the Saudi criminals, was at the same time
1. a ferocious denial of European Enlightenment, Humanism, and Democratic Ideals,
2. a paranoid suicidal act that stripped Europe in its totality from any right to Lights, Human Rights, and Democracy Advocacy,
3. an immoral deed that tarnished irreversibly the World Image of Christianity, and
4. the Birth Certificate of Islamic Terrorism.

The idiots of the Foreign Office, and the Whitehall, thought they were able to put an end to the Islamic Caliphate, and to eradicate Islam’s chief personality after the Sultan’s deposal; and like this they accelerated the rise of the phenomenon of Islamic Terrorism. Incorrigible and irredeemable, the colonial establishments of France and England cannot understand even in the year 2006 that countries like Saudi Arabia cannot be allowed to exist. They consist in a direct insult of 6000 years of Human History.

Saudi Arabia truly endangers the entire world with its pernicious willingness to secretively promote Islamic Terrorism, and in the name of its fake Islam diffuse antihuman Satanism allover the world. Meeting with Saudi representatives and thuggish diplomats of the nomadic sort is a most deplorable option for ambassadors and statesmen of countries allover the world; these mendacious and lewd humanoids cheat all the Westerners by promising cooperation and Islamic terrorism containment, and at the same time promoting Terrorism with their petrodollars. Consequently, Saudi Arabia is the first country that must be kept out of Iraq; even diplomatic relations must not be allowed. At a preliminary stage, the Iraqi – Saudi border should be entirely wired, and as soon as the US impose order in Iraq, the plan for the ultimate demise of the Saudi barbaric realm must be executed.

Saudi Arabia cannot be left to exist; its existence signifies automatically death threat for the entire Western World, and obliteration threat for the Humanity’s Best Ideals, Moral Concepts and Philosophical Principles.

We cannot afford to consider as an achievement that not a single person in the world did not suggest the three aforementioned countries be involved in the Iraq ordeal so far; it was simple and basic logic. Quite strangely, this approach did not concern two other neighbors of Mesopotamia.

Syria – a technical entity that represents nothing more than another tyranny well prepared and put into function by the colonial powers. Syria is not a country; the local populations did not demand any independence in 1918, as they did not consist in a nation of their own! As in many other cases of direct and/or indirect colonial involvement, France and local pro-French agents were not able to explain to the local masses why they should secede from the Ottoman Empire. They did their best to defame the administration of these people, turn them against their own country, and for this several ottoman citizens had to flee from these Ottoman provinces as exposed to accusations for high treason.

This was the typical colonial practice:
1. Attract few local people with promises of materialistic wealth
2. Convince the attracted ones to become dissident voices within their own country
3. Manipulate them on a plan that would help colonial interests and damage Ottoman interests
4. Expose them therefore to natural ottoman reprisals, as any country exist in order to maintain order among its citizens
5. When the gullible dissidents were exposed to reprisals (persecution, jail, exile, capital penalty), the colonials were maintaining their double face and voice that had obviously brought nefarious results to the locally involved
a. extorting the dissidents to have them engaged more actively in acts against their own country (providing them with false info supposedly obtained through diplomatic way, according to which the dissidents’ fate had already been decided upon),
b. extorting the Ottoman authorities by mendaciously providing them with insightful that would make them take even more severe measures against the dissidents, and at the same time
c. accusing the Ottoman Empire for genocides, discrimination against the Christian populations, and all sorts of discredited policies.

These practices brought Syria to ‘existence’; ever since not a single political party, intellectual group, academic circle of the artificial state were able to truly assess what had happened to them, and what sort of ‘national’ ‘independence’ had been adjusted upon them. The country shifted to cruel dictatorship, and was plunged to analphabetism, underdevelopment, stagnation, apathy and absolute darkness. Minority groups became omnipotent establishments, and practiced multi-dimensional oppression, exporting the burden of Damascus to Phoenicia that the disreputable French colonizers tried to arabize, shaping another bogus-nation, ‘Lebanon’.

Syria encapsulates the same monstrous model that the world had to face in the desperate case of Iraq. So, a mentally healthy person could immediately understand that any Syrian contact with Iraq is not ‘contact’ but contamination.

What can people of the murderer Bashir Assad’s gang possibly do in Iraq? Murder politicians and kill Christian deputies?

The first question a mentally healthy would ask as regards Syria’s possible ‘help’ for a solution in Iraq is this:

- What is the country with more oppressed and more discriminated minorities, Iraq or Syria?

Another, quite pertinent, question would be the following:

- How Syria, with its minorities more marginalized and more terrorized than those of Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, can bring in anything positive in Iraq?

A third question would be the next:

- How a country with a provocative record of inhuman atrocities in Lebanon can do better in another country?

The most conclusive question would be:

- What was longer, worst and more barbaric a subjugation of a foreign country? The Iraqi invasion of Kuwait or the Syrian occupation of Lebanon?

A wise stratagem would be to suggest that Syria gets involved in Iraq, after the tyrannical regime of Damascus offers to all the linguistic, religious and ethnic groups of Syria the constitutional privileges offered by the US to those of Iraq.

Until them, anyone who thinks about the continuation of the Syrian abomination as a humanly acceptable possibility, must be reminded the sociopolitical realities confronted by the Syrian people on daily basis; they are of ethnic – linguistic – religious nature.
The ruling Alawis (branch of Shia Islam) are all involved in the tyrannical administration, with nepotism and tribalism being overwhelming; yet, the Alawis represent about 16% of the country’s population. The oppressed groups include Aramaeans (belonging to various Christian denominations) 12%, Sunni Kurds 12%,, Sunni Circassians 3%, Druze Neo-Phoenicians 3%, Armenians 2%, Turkic peoples 2%, and Sunni Arabic speaking people 50%.

Practically speaking, the most urgent concern about Damascus is not its involvement in Iraq but the final dissolution and split of the country into mainly four con-federal provinces: Sunni, Alawi, Aramaean and Kurdish. The end of Syria must come soon, as the ultimate liberation of its long martyred peoples.

Iran – the Great Satan of the Nuclear Ayatullahs with the cretinous president who intends to exterminate several billions of people, until his long awaited burlesque and charlatan Messiah of ‘Mahdi’ appears to save us and mend the world (or what will have been left after the effort to finally convince this bogus-Messiah to appear publicly).

The country amounts to oppressed ethnic, religious, and linguistic groups, inhuman practices and totalitarian policies that are denounced by more than 75% of its numerous peoples. With Arabic speaking Aramaeans in Khuzestan, Syriac speaking Aramaeans throughout Western Iran, Azeris, Kurds, Turks, Turkmens, Loris, Bakhtiaris, Armenians, Bahais, Ahl-e Haq, Zoroasterian Parsis, Baluchis, Afghanis, and Persians (totaling approximately 45% of the entire population) deprived of basic Human Rights, Iran is a real Cemetery of Peoples. Plunging the masses to ultimate misery and ostensible poverty, the Ayatullah gang use the national income to pursue nuclear military emancipation and war expansion plans throughout the Middle East, primarily targeting Israel, and through Israel, America, Europe, Christianity, Vatican, the Western World, Turkey and various other regional countries. Iran ceaselessly rekindles anti-Christian and anti-Russian policies and strife in the Caucasus region and in Central Asia where the main obstacle to its obscurantist ambitions is Turkey.

Having this country involved in Iraq corresponds to what Lenin used to say about Capitalists, namely that they would sell the communists the rope to hang them with. Instead of considering pathetic options like this, the US should engage in military action in Iran that would lead to total destruction of the nuclear facilities, and to ultimate split of the murderous theocracy to at least 6 countries: Azerbaijan – Turkistan, Kurdistan, Lorestan – Bakhtiaristan, Aramaic Khuzestan, Persia, and Baluchistan.

Turkey – the only solution in Iraq

The only solution in Iraq is Turkey, Turkish and American soldiers imposing peace and resettlement to the Aramaeans, the Turkmens, the Kurds, and the Shia, and ultimate punishment to the Sunni who backed en masse both, Saddam tyranny and Al Qaeda terrorism.

Renamed as Aram Nahrain, split into four con-federal states (Aram, Turkmenia, Kurdistan, Basra sanjak for the Shia), and controlled by Turkish soldiers, Mesopotamia will find peace, returning to the country from where it was illegally detached and confiscated.

This would be the beginning of the end for the colonial rule in the Middle East, and as non-colonial option, it should be viewed by the Bush administration as the only possible.

(first published in www.americanchronicle.com)