The Horn of Africa Conference Clique, and their Dark Plans for Egypt, Sudan, ‘Ethiopia’, and Somalia

In two earlier articles, we unveiled the ominous plans pursued by the Horn of Africa conference organizers, who resumed its sixth session in Lund University, Sweden, last August 23 to 26, in order to generate, according to their terms, a "constructive dialogue amongst civil society groups, scholars, political leaders and business communities from the Sudan, Somalia, Ethiopia, Eritrea and Djibouti".

The bogus-Horn of Africa Conference clique undertakes a great part of effort to prepare the articulations on which to set the most malignant, anti-African, and inhuman Colonial plan with respect to Eastern Africa, namely to compose a huge East African Christian state, named "Coptic Republic of Ethiopia" that would stretch from Egypt’s southern borders down to the coast of Kenya, strangling and enslaving therefore dozens of millions of Muslims, Christians and followers of traditional African religions, and destroying the last chances for Democracy, Progress, Development, Enlightenment, Freedom, and Human Rights in Africa (http://www.buzzle.com/articles/horn-of-africa-monstrous-colonial-plans-unveiled.html -  http://www.buzzle.com/articles/colonial-plans-for-the-horn-of-africa-ethiopia-to-border-with-egypt.html).

In the future, we will dedicate more articles to the subject the roots of which are very old; one can find background information related to the origin and the main formulators of this paranoid and viciously antihuman, colonial plan in an earlier article entitled ‘Ethiopia: a Panacea for Tyrants, a Stiletto in Colonial Hands’ (http://www.buzzle.com/articles/ethiopia-panacea-tyrants-stiletto-colonial-hands.html).

In this article, we will present excerpts from an article published by a leading member of the Horn of Africa Conference Clique, and we will demonstrate the historical distortions and falsifications on which this plan is set; in addition, we will denounce the political ideology that is markedly employed to support the claims and the secretive needs of this erratic group that consists only in the visible but small part of the Colonial Iceberg that intends to soon hit Africa with the utmost callousness.

Mammo Muchie’s lethal trap: ‘Unite the people from the Red Sea to the Indian Ocean’

Top apologist of the conference is the author of an article that, under the aforementioned, seductive and sedative title, attempts to attract, convince and seduce innocent, innocuous and gullible people, in order to gain support for his masters’ plans. The seduction operated through this criminal act is of colossal dimensions; in an era of economic, political, cultural globalization, it is always magnetically attractive to introduce the idea of a wide conglomeration at a moment no other has seemingly spoken about.

When so many people allover the world are compelled to believe that survival is available only in the super-states where the small entities, the distinctiveness of the localisms, and the independence of thought are nullified, it is certainly soporific to speak about a union from the Red Sea to the Indian Ocean.

Mr. Muchie’s article was published in various portals, but we came to notice it in the Sudan Tribune (http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article23512) on   30 August 2007; it was written one day earlier, which means 3 days after the termination of the ominous Horn of Africa Conference sessions.

Of course, under the title one can initially imagine many and various countries as included; Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Oman, Pakistan, and even India fit in the picture, but Mr. Muchie is very careful to setup a vast entity whereby Muslims will be a minority.

It is interesting to note that Mr. Muchie mobilizes all his intellectual resources and all his personal archives of pompous bubbles enunciated by idealistic statesmen and African leaders, in order to use them as possibly convincing and compelling arguments for his (and his masters’) position. His incredible text (approx. 3600 words) is preceded by no less than five (5) statements, flauntingly, pompously and portentously uttered by Kwame Nkrumah, Jomo Kenyatta, Julius Nyerere, Habib Bourguiba, and Isaias Afewerki.

We will not comment here either on these statesmen or on their ideas, practices, and deeds; they have only one thing in common, namely they were the founding leaders of their respective countries, i.e. Ghana, Kenya, Tanganyika (currently Tanzania), Tunisia and Eritrea. We simply denounce the attitude to rely on unrelated statements pronounced by others in order to extirpate justification and corroboration for your words and suggestions; either you can develop a correct argument on your own or you can’t, and then forget the rest!

A motto can never be taken as the main, influential, and convincing element of a great proposal.

Mammo Muchie evokes African leaders only to paraphrase them!

We republish these statements here in order to let readers evaluate how unrelated they are to Mr. Muchie’s purpose.

"As long as boundaries inherited... drawn arbitrarily with no heed to the ethnic, economic and social realities of Africa (continue), so long shall we be plagued by the political refugee problem… (Thus) the fault is in ours, not in our stars!" K. Nkrumah, October, 1965, Accra

"Where there has been racial hatred, it must be ended. Where there has been tribal animosity, it will be finished. Let us not dwell upon the bitterness of the past. I would rather look to the future, to the good new Kenya, not to the bad old days. If we can create this sense of national direction and identity, we shall have gone a long way toward solving our economic problems." Jomo Kenyatta, Kenya ’s founding President

"This is my plea to the new generation of African leaders and African peoples: work for unity with firm conviction that without unity there is no future for Africa …I reject the glorification of the nation-state, which we have inherited from colonialism, and the artificial nations we are trying to forge from that inheritance. We are all Africans trying to be Ghanaians or Tanzanians. Fortunately for Africa we have not been completely successful…Unity will not make us rich, but it can make it difficult for Africa and the African peoples to be disregarded and humiliated. And it will therefore increase the effectiveness of the decisions we make and try to implement for our development. My generation led Africa to political freedom. The current generation of leaders and peoples of Africa must pick up the flickering torch of African freedom, refuel it with their enthusiasm and determination, and carry it forward." Julius Nyerere, First president of Tanzania

"Deal with the enemy of today without ever forgetting that he could become the friend of tomorrow" Habib Bourguiba, First president of Tunisia

"...Constructing a nation from scratch: We know we don’t have the knowledge. We know we do not have the resources. We know we do not have the experience. Our conclusion is: let’s face it." Isaias Afewerki, current president of Eritrea (quoted from National Geographic, June 1996, p.87)

Kwame Nkrumah

Correct understanding of K. Nkrumah’s statement shows total rejection of the colonial borders on African soil; but Mr. Muchie fails to denounce in the most categorical way the borders of the ‘Ethiopian’ relic, Africa’s most loathed tyranny that comprises a great number of peoples who never wished to be invaded by the Amhara barbaric soldiers of Menelik and Haile Selassie.  Oromos, Ogadenis, Sidamas, Afars, Gambellas, Shekachos, and Kaffas want desperately and passionately the total destruction of the Abyssinian borders of Hell that condemned them to underdevelopment, oppression and excruciating tyranny.

Jomo Kenyatta

Exact judgment of Jomo Kenyatta’s excerpt lets us realize that Kenya’s Founding Father took a stance against racial hatred; I would truly appreciate if Mr. Muchie were able to address the uncultured, barbaric, uneducated, rogue and racist Amharas of Abyssinia, organizing not a conference but a campaign of racial reconciliation under the title "Love the Oromo Culture, Become Acquainted with Sidama Values, Respect the Ogadeni Ethos, Admire the Shekacho Traditions, Esteem the Kaffa Way of Life, Appreciate the Afar Mores, and Feel Affection for the Gambella Customs". Only in this way, the indescribable Mr. Muchie would have a chance to eradicate the deeply rooted hatred from the Amhara minds and hearts. It is essential for him to understand that Hatred originates from either Contempt. And it is not bearable or permissible anymore to allow Amharas cultivate this contempt for so many noble peoples. That’s why, following the independence of all these peoples, Mr. Muchie should deploy effort greater than that demonstrated within the context of this bogus-conference in order to convince the Amharas that they are just another people, next to the aforementioned.

Julius Nyerere

Julius Nyerere’s text is truly enlightening! Mr. Muchie should understand it in the way we all do. The Father of the Tanzanian Nation speaks explicitly of ‘political freedom’; this is what all the aforementioned peoples of the Mortuary ‘Ethiopia’ strive, and Mr. Muchie seems to deny it to them. He may insist on the other key word of Julius Nyerere’s text: ‘Unity’. This is the unity of all the long tyrannized Kushitic Nations of the Atrocious Tyranny ‘Ethiopia’ against the Amhara and Tigray, Abyssinian invaders and oppressors.

Bourguiba

As Tunisia’s Bourguiba said, today’s enemy may be tomorrow’s friend; this is certainly a possibility for the Amharas and the Tigrays to be – with respect to the Oromos, the Ogadenis, the Sidamas, the Afars, the Gambellas, the Shekachos, and the Kaffas, when all these peoples set up their long desired and most deserved national states.

Who said that only the Amharas and the Tiigrays must have a state in which to tyrannize all the rest, whom they – as criminal racists – consider as ‘insects’?

And as Afeworki said it, all these peoples passionately desire to construct their nations ‘from scratch’.

Mr. Muchie’s article, analysis, and proposals

Mr. Muchie’s text contains an introduction and four parts; we will publish progressively every part and its refutation. In the beginning, we will publish the introduction and the first part altogether, Numbers encrusted in Mr. Muchie’s text refer to points of refutation

Introduction and First Part (title: ‘Special relationship’) of Mr. Muchie’s article 

"August 29, 2007 — The Horn of Africa Conference was held for the sixth time in Lund University , Sweden between 23 August and 26 August, 2007. It is guided by a wonderful concept of generating constructive dialogue amongst civil society groups, scholars, political leaders and business communities from the Sudan , Somalia , Ethiopia , Eritrea and Djibouti.
 
The theme of the conference was on post-conflict peace-building with the objective of identifying key characteristics and contentious issues with a view to facilitate a communicative rationality to encourage consensus by enabling networking and possible undertaking of future activities by the stakeholders drawn across the regions. Indeed such a venture to bring the relevant and significant actors from the region 1 to learn to cooperate and not continue to fight and hate is commendable. In this conference attendance was full 2, the arguments were lively and at times heated and the issues urgent and very compelling. Not only were all the ambassadors from the region represented and participated, (except Eritrea represented by a Counsellor serving as the ambassador), but also scholars from the region as well as from Scandinavia participated. There was a lot of information and opportunities for networking in the conference. The conference was to come up with recommendations to facilitate a post-conflict era in the wider region from the Red Sea to the Indian Ocean 3. The question we ask is the following: will such a useful forum be helpful in advancing the cause of building trust 4 and moving into a higher level of unity amongst the relevant forces in the region? Can it be useful to create dialogue and communication by refocusing thought 5 and action to solve the real problems of real people? 6 Can it bring the communities, intellectuals, civil societies, the state and society together? 7 If nothing else this conference concentrates our thoughts to ask many pertinent questions.

Special Relationship

The people residing from the Red Sea to the Indian Ocean have a special relationship. 8 The Ethiopian ambassador 9 made this point very clearly and in several occasions in the two days I attended on the 25th and 26th. The people and the region can either move forward by acting together "like a great body that refuses mutilation" 10 (Fanon) and works for enduring composition or they can also remain trapped in fighting 11, spreading hate 12 and confusion by trying to pursue misguided missions to form nations without knowledge, resources and experience 13 as Isias boasts. In Africa the post-colonial states have not been successful to bring about a tolerable and acceptable level of well being of the people nor bring fully yet the dignity and respect of Africa from marginalisation and constant state of conflict and warfare. The countries of the Horn of Africa by now should have learned the bitter lesson from the way they mutilated each other by joining the cold war and dying for an agenda which has nothing to do with their own welfare. Having failed to learn from the Cold War debacle 14, they seem to fall in once again for being victims of global agendas 15 and global politics they have absolutely no part in manufacturing. Some of them fight on the side of one set of global actors that fight another set of global actors. As long as they continue to do so and behave with such subservience to other powers greater than them, they may have a geographical proximity, but may not be able to realise and cement their special relationship to construct a shared present and future free from war and misery. A special relationship means a unity of purpose and approach to develop a shared goal 16, direction and strategy on how to deal with the external forces and internal challenges in the region itself. How can "one Africa that fights against colonialism and another that attempts to make arrangements with it" (Fanon) ever unite to pursue shared goals 17 either as good neighbours or as entities that need to share a common approach 18 in relation to outside forces that come with their own exclusive agenda and/or internal challenges that can be overcome by deploying unity borne of the special historical, cultural and spatial connections of the region 19 and the people in it?"

Refutation of the Introduction and the First Part of Mr. Muchie’s article 

Point 1.

It would be useful to wonder whether the ‘relevant and significant actors from the region’ have truly been invited in the infamous conference; were Sidama intellectuals, like Seyoum Hameso, and political leaders, like Kambata Xola, invited? No!

Were Oromo intellectuals and professors, like Mekuria Bulcha and Ezekiel Gebissa, invited? No!

Were Ogadeni leaders invited in order to shed light on what happens today in Ogaden? Where was Fowsia Abdulkadir and the pioneering team of the Ogaden Human Rights Committee, whose reports have shaken people allover the world because of the Tigrays’ and Amharas’ bestial deeds recounted?

Where were the Kunamas of Eritrea, the Bejas of Sudan, the Mahrani of Yemen, and the Oromos of Kenya?

Nowhere!

This conference was therefore the meeting point of unrepresentative bogus-diplomats who played their ludicrous and execrable theater, as possible representatives of the peoples whom they hate, disdain and tyrannize!

To this realm of shame and cruelty, lower clerical employees of much loathed African tyrannies have been voluntarily added, only to meet the European scholarly accomplices, the shameful tutors of neo-colonialism and mass eradication.

Their theories about disregarding national and cultural idiosyncrasy and distinctiveness are worse-than-Nazi threats against the Mankind.

These criminally totalitarian theories equal to cynical increases in carbon dioxide emissions; in the same way the latter drive to extinction several species per day, the former intend to depopulate the African Continent in order to make parts of it available for re-population by the white – "superior" – races.

Who can contradict any person who rightfully would call the conference as a Neo-Nazi spearhead?

Point 2
 
"The conference attendance was full"; that’s not a great exploit! In 1933 Germany, alle Plaetze waren voll besetzt!

Point 3

The statement ‘post-conflict era in the wider region from the Red Sea to the Indian Ocean’ is erratic; with so many ongoing wars and conflicts, it would look preposterous today to call the vast area as in a ‘post-conflict era’. Furthermore, the existence of various tyrannies that perpetrate indescribable socioeconomic destructions and inflict environmental disasters to so many oppressed peoples lets us understand that before we dare use the term ‘post-conflict era’, we should call for conflict resolution, tyranny abolition, and national liberation.

Sudan, Abyssinia – comically re-baptized ‘Ethiopia’, Eritrea, Somalia and Djibouti, which is the targeted area by the Conference clique represent an appalling record of Human Rights violations to which it is primary task of the entire world to put an end. Fake ‘Ethiopia’ and Sudan should split beforehand, Eritrea should respect and offer full rights to its various ethnic groups, whereas Somalis should learn to share life and power in their country. We have not entered the ‘post-conflict era’ thus far!

What makes things worse is the fact that the pompously organized conference did not offer a clear cut definition of who belongs and who does not belong to this "wider region from the Red Sea to the Indian Ocean", and why.

No one should expect them to proceed so; their dark targets being known, they will try to seduce through vagueness, inaccuracy, mythical assumptions, and nebulous concepts.

Point 4

‘Building trust’? If this is what the shameless Mr. Muchie wants, then the solution is simple; tyrant Meles Zenawi should withdraw his bogus-army of thugs and gangsters from Ogaden, and the Ogadenis should be left to organize their society democratically, installing Order, Justice, Respect of the Human Beings, and rightfully exploiting their Natural Resources that do not belong to the Tigray tribe of tyrant Zenawi.

Then, certainly trust will be built between an independent state called ‘Ogaden’ and another state named ‘Tigray Abyssinia’.

Point 5

With the suggestion about ‘refocusing thought’, all the masks fall down, and we know with whom we have to do; Mr. Muchie wants to tell us that the Sidamas must refocus their thought! Instead of demanding Independence, they must seek out how to be hired as housemaids by the Amhara invaders of Finfinne – that Mr. Muchie probably calls Addis Ababa, very erratically.

The Ogadenis must refocus their thought too! Instead of insisting on being the masters of their land, and on exploiting their Natural Resources, they must accept that the Amharas and the Tigrays rightfully steal everything!

The Oromos must also refocus their thought! Instead of fighting for Freedom, and instead of willing to establish their Capital, Finfinne, on the ashes of the provisory center of tyranny named Addis Ababa, they must admit that they will be forever slaves meant to plant eucalyptus trees. Nice!

To whom does Mr. Muchie dare give his racist course? Hidden behind the anonymity of a foreign apprentice magician in faraway Scandinavia, he probably speaks comfortably. If he were in terrorized Ogaden’s capital Jigjiga, would he say all this again? Who does he think he is? Has someone told him that average Ogadenis, Sidama peasants, and Oromo merchants need a lackey of the West’s most venomous, anti-African, criminal circles to admonish them?

Point 6

"Real problems of real people?". I thought for a while that Mr. Muchie cares only about his imaginative aberrations and the dreary and omni-disastrous plans of his masters. Real problems of the Ogadenis, the Oromos, the Sidamas and all the other tyrannized peoples of Abyssinia and Sudan – who are real people – are the following:
1. the unprecedented scale robbery perpetrated by the Amharas and the Tigrays, who have exploited all the natural resources of the occupied lands of the Ogadenis, the Oromos, the Sidamas, and the others, depriving them therefore from real progress and socioeconomic development,
2. the lack of freedom in every expression of private and social life, and the merciless attitude by which they have been dealt with,
3. the struggle for Independence, and
4. the search for a National Statehood that would ensure Democracy, Freedom, Respect for Human Rights, and viable socioeconomic progress and development.

In brief, their real problem is that they want as soon as possible to get rid of the Amhara – Tigray Abyssinian pestilence.

Point 7

Of course, ‘communities, intellectuals, civil societies, the state and the society’ can be brought together; for Oromos it will happen in the free Biyya Oromo, for Ogadenis it will come to pass in the liberated Ogaden, for the Sidamas it will happen in the independent Sidama Land, and so on. And for Amharas it will be possible in their state of Gonder which belongs to them, in the same way Makele belongs to the Tigrays.

If independent states can exist for the Slovenes and the Luxembourgian, the Maltese, and the Estonians, small nations with populations between 0.5 and 1.5 million people, independent states must also be formed for Abyssinia’s long tyrannized Shekachos, Gambellas, Kaffas, Afars, and Sidamas. 
 
Point 8

Who says that "people residing from the Red Sea to the Indian Ocean have a special relationship"? Who are the components, the peoples included in the ill-defined area? Nothing is said; then nothing can be accepted! It’s anyone’s guess. If by the aforementioned, the conference targets (the five states) are referred to, then this is absolutely wrong.

Sudan has shared with Egypt a far more "special relationship" than with the rest, namely Eritrea, ‘Ethiopia’, Djibouti and Somalia.

Worse, Somalia has shared far more with the Kenyan and Tanzanian coasts, and with Yemen, than with the rest, namely Eritrea, ‘Ethiopia’, and Djibouti.

Even worse, the entire South of fake ‘Ethiopia’ has had a far more "special relationship" with Central and North Eastern Sudan, and with Kenya and Somalia than with the North of ‘Ethiopia’ and Eritrea.

Adding to the issue, the entire East of fake ‘Ethiopia’, Ogaden, has had a far more "special relationship" with Somalia than with the rest of the countries and provinces involved.

 In fact, Yemen had closer relations with the Abyssinian mountainous land, and at the same time very close relations with Somalia. The centre of a unification effort around the Horn of Africa lies rather in Yemen, not in the Abyssinian appendix of Yemen.

Puntland relates to Egypt, not Abyssinia / bogus-Ethiopia

In addition, Somalia’s relations with Egypt have been far denser than the Somali – Abyssinian relationship. Even today, the existence of a state named Puntland, after the Ancient Egyptian name ‘Punt’ for the 2nd millennium BCE Horn of Africa (when the Abyssinian ancestors of the Amharas and the Tigrays were still all in Yemen!), underscores the Egyptian influences on Somalia, where the Abyssinians left no impact at all.

Point 9

Suffice it that one reads that the aforementioned mistaken sentence was uttered by the "Ethiopian ambassador", i.e. the loathsome unrepresentative agent of Africa’s worst tyranny, and the correct conclusion can be immediate drawn – along with a laughter for the vulgar ignorance and shameless garishness of the person.

Point 10

We have enough evidence from Europe, and more particularly from the Baltic countries, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, and the post-Yugoslavian risen democracies, Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia, Macedonia, Montenegro, and Kosovo, that oppressed peoples living in lands illegally invaded and tyrannically occupied boom when they achieve Independence, Self-Determination, Democracy and Freedom.

Estonia would have never been European Union’s IT locomotive if it had been left at the hands of Russians. All references to Franz Fanon are misinterpretations, and usurpations – a practice well known to the uneducated Amharas and Tigrays, and to their malignant backers.

Who ‘refuses mutilation’? The answer is simple:  Somalia!

Point 11

‘Trapped in fighting’? This consists in an ignominious alteration of the works and the spirit of Franz Fanon, who supported anti-colonial movements similar to those of the Oromos, the Ogadenis, the Sidamas, and other tyrannized peoples in the Morgue ‘Ethiopia’. It is as if you select an excerpt of the type "You are beautiful’, and you pretend that the author attributed it to an unknown monster!

Point 12

‘Spreading hate’? Really? Is it now, in the year 2007, that Mr. Muchie remembered the spread of hatred? He should know that this is very late.

First to stop spreading hatred should have been the notorious Ras Wolde Giyorgis who, during his military campaign launched on January 13, 1898 against the Gofa, Galeb and Hamerbako regions, announced the following to his soldiers (quoted by Bulatovich, M. Ethiopia through Russian Eyes, translated: Country in Transition 1896-1898, translated and edited by Richard Seltzer, Lawrence, NJ: Red Sea Press, 2000, p.239 - as mentioned by Mekuria Bulcha in The Oromo Diaspora, chapter 3, Minneapolis, Kirk House Publishers, 2002):

"Listen! Listen! Listen! Whoever does not listen is an enemy of the Lord and of the Mother of God! Listen! Whoever does not listen is an enemy of the Lord and of the church! Listen! Whoever does not listen is an enemy of Menelik! Warriors! I am setting out on a campaign against the Shankala (Negroes). All of you assemble on the first Holiday of Baptism in Andarachi [capital of the newly conquered kindom of Kafa]. Whoever is late will not go on the campaign and will miss this unique opportunity to win fame and get livestock and prisoners"

In the light of this evidence, the prejudiced Mr. Muchie should rethink, reconsider, and launch a campaign against Hatred and Racial Discrimination among the only concerned: the Amhara and Tigray Abyssinians.

Point 13

‘Misguided missions to form nations without knowledge, resources and experience’! This is another aberration! Do you know many nations that achieved independence and at that very moment they already were equipped with leading universities, sophisticated research centres, and rationally exploited resources, and possessed an unparalleled experience? Probably, not; there has never been a nation to achieve knowledge, resource exploitation, and valuable experience before its independence.

It is precisely the opposite that happens; by ensuring themselves national independence, nations pursue the path of the Education, Knowledge, Scientific Research, Economic Development matched with rational exploitation of National Resources, and Techn(olog)ical Prowess. All these are dimensions of the consequences of National Independence.

Point 14

Mr. Muchie gets it wrong for a millionth time! Those who failed ‘to learn from the Cold War debacle’ are the Amhara and Tigray totalitarian elites of Abyssinia who still are unable to understand, 16 years after the decomposition of Soviet Union – that there will be no nations subdued and tyrannized anymore.

The forthcoming, explosive and lethal splitting of the Lawless and Inhuman Tyranny of Abyssinia will be the Modern Times’ most spectacular dissolution of totalitarian state.

The Amhara and Tigray elites know this very well, and panicked rely exclusively on agents, like Mr. Muchie, and on – (how comically!) unknown to them – plans of the colonial powers, hopefully thinking that they will be met with a late 19th century repetition!

The Cold War debacle was nothing else but the well deserved termination of cruel and dictatorial states that had demonstrated Zero Tolerance degree with respect to various oppressed peoples’ cultures, faiths, historical traditions, and socio-behavioural systems.

Point 15

‘Victims of global agendas’! Mr. Muchie must be daydreaming! National Independence of an entire people is not a point in any global agenda! Even worse, why should for instance the Sidamas bother whether their own – Existential – goal, namely that of National Statehood, is part of the African Agenda of China, India, the US or other powers?

Self-identification is a Supreme Concept that antedates all possible political agendas; the Sidamas identified themselves as a Distinctive Noble Nation, deserving independence, before the US, India or Brazil came to existence, and before the Russians and the Chinese came to know about the existence of the Sidamas. The same concerns all the other tyrannized nations of Abyssinia.

Point 16

‘Shared goal’? This presupposes independence of all concerned parties and their equal participation in the deliberations and the negotiations. Otherwise it oscillates from immoral to satirical.

Could you imagine today a dialogue about "shared goals" between a Tigray and an Ogadeni representatives?

The Tigray would probably say the following:

- Share my goal, otherwise I will kill you and expropriate your family from all your belongings!

The epitome of free negotiations! 

Point 17

It is shameful for some people pretending to have spent some years in a university, like the deceitfully innocuous Mr. Muchie, to quote Franz Fanon in such a perverse way; the sentence ‘one Africa that fights against colonialism and another that attempts to make arrangements with it’ is in absolute discordance with the Abyssinian colonial policy because since the times of Menelik the cruel Amhara and Tigray tyrants made arrangements with the Colonials, becoming the only African country to colonize African soil.

Point 18

The phrase ‘a common approach in relation to outside forces’ consists in a bullet shot at the heart of the African peoples; Mr. Muchie must come to terms with the fact that he is the last person in the world to admonish oppressed and tyrannized peoples in Africa. Any anti-colonial alliance that could help oppressed African peoples achieve national independence is laudable.

Point 19

Above all, Mr. Muchie, completely irrelevant of African History , should be offered a crash course in African History in order to finally learn that the Historical Past of the five (5) countries targeted by the Conference organizers does not suggest any hint of Unity (either historical, cultural or spatial – the approach and the selection of adjectives is erroneous, but I just quote here).

The five (5) targeted countries were never part of a single state at any historical moment whatsoever.

In a forthcoming article, we will refute Mr. Muchie further inconsistencies in the other parts of his multi-erroneous pseudo-lecture.

Note
Bas reliefs from the Southern Colonnade of Hatshepsut's mortuary temple at Deir el Bahari (Western Thebes) - Luxor. The extensively narrated and impressively depicted Expedition to Punt sent for trade purposes to the coast of Somalia around 1480 BCE highlights the diachronic Egyptian impact on Somalia and the entire Horn of Africa region where the Amhara and Tigray Abyssinians have always remained an alien element.