Refutation of the Kinijit Neo-Nazi Amhara Abyssinians

In a previous article, entitled ‘The Real Face of the Kinijit Neo-Nazi ‘Ethiopian’ Interlocutors of the US’, we published a letter of protest, sent most probably by a high profile Kinijit member, whom we attempted to possibly identify. The letter testifies to sheer barbarism that prevails among the Neo-Nazi Amharas. This was the reason we published it, as the real character and true identity of these guys must be widely known. The letter is totally inconsistent, full of hatred, hysteria, and schizophrenic reactions that we have no need to analyze, as it would be good only for a psychiatrist; yet, it contains a certain number of interesting falsifications that reveal – unluckily for the author – the dark Kinijit Amhara intentions of a revengeful comeback. That is why we find it necessary to focalize on these points.

Quite interestingly, the subject line of the mail is used in order to prove the Neo-Nazi, totalitarian character of the Kinijit gang; when you encounter a typical representative of Kinijit who dares demand from another person to "Stop Writing about …" something, few chances are left for an eventual Kinijit government to let its opponents speak and write freely. What better proof of the despotic nature of the Kinijit leaders could this mail possibly offer?

In his first sentence, the Kinijit aspiring dictator repeats the same, only to add on the second line that this (exclusively made of Amhara tribe members) racist and discriminatory party, which viciously enough for a political formation in 2007 does not mention in its documents any of the other peoples of ‘Ethiopia’, is "the spirit and the pride of all Ethiopians".

This is a paranoia that simply cannot be said; the outright majority of the country is made of the repeatedly and mercilessly killed Ogadenis, Sidamas, Anuaks, Shekachos, Oromos, Afars, and others – the pro-Zenawi Tigrays included – who have not forgotten the cruel behaviour of the monarchical (Menelik to Haile Selassie) and communist (Mengistu), Amhara regimes that preceded the current Tigray Zenawi.

In reality, only the Amhara Monophysitic Christians may be fond of Kinijit; this means approximately 8 - 9 % of the country’s population. How could one consider logical to pretend that the murdered and oppressed populations of all the other peoples could ever be proud of ….. their murderers and oppressors? As attempt, it is sick.

Of course, there is a hidden reality behind this excerpt; if Kinijit is acceptable for Amharas only and at the same time a Kinijit member says that Kinijit is the pride of all the Ethiopians, this means that Kinijit considers as ‘Ethiopians’ only the Amharas, which is a double proof of racism:

First, the Kinijit Amharas usurp the national name of ‘Ethiopia’ that does not belong to them, but to all the descendents of the Ancient Kushitic populations whom the Ancient Greeks called Ethiopians, and

Second, they do not accept as Ethiopians the Oromos, the Ogadenis, and many other Kushitic peoples as such!

The inability to discuss a subject is highlighted by the attempt to drive the discussion to another subject; anyone with experience in the engagement of a discussion with Amharas has shared this experience! When you mention the Oromos’ current rejection of the Amhara rule, they speak of the …. Ottoman Empire; when you refer to today’s massacres at Ogaden, they talk about …… Yugoslavia! Nonsensical and revelatory! And why would someone, who repeatedly supported the ideas of Kemal Ataturk, be possibly annoyed because of the collapse (after the duration of 600 years) of a dynasty that was precisely abolished by … Kemal Ataturk?

It is absolutely ludicrous to even suggest that the tiny and impotent Amhara state of Abyssinia around the arid mountains in the Lake Tana area could have possibly ‘embarrassed’ the 16th century’s greater power that controlled the Eritrean and Somali coast along with all its territories in Africa (Algeria to Sudan and thence to Somalia), Europe and Asia. And it has nothing to do with the present problems of Abyssinia’s oppressed peoples.

Many people should carefully notice the Kinijit totalitarianism that is revealed through the lines: "Ethiopia will stay forever!!! After kinijit comes back to power we will regain Eritrea and maybe even Somaliland".

Not only the Amhara totalitarian imbeciles want to prolong the oppression of Oromos, Ogadenis, Sidamas, Afars, Anuaks, Shekachos and others, but they want to get more definitely involved in Somalia, through the annexation of Somaliland, and nonetheless invade in the process another sovereign state, namely Eritrea.

The irresponsibility of this dictatorial expansionism of the Kinijit mad dogs risks exploding the entire East Africa region, throwing its populations in a – first – open frontal battle Islam vs. Christianity whereby the first losers will be the Amharas and the ultimately losers will be the Western powers (America and Europe) that thoughtlessly will have allowed this confrontation to take place.

As result of their permanent frustration due to the well known historical complexes of Amhara inferiority as regards the Somalis, a far wealthier nation of more open people who traveled across many parts of the world as traders and navigators, ensuring Muslim thalassocracy throughout the Indian Ocean, the Amhara Kinijit gang – if ruling – will exacerbate the divisions of the Somalis, escalate the current Tigray regime’s oppressive methods, and deteriorate the situation up to the point of radicalizing most of the Somalis, and pushing most of them to enroll in the Islamic Courts of Justice, and fight to Death.

This would be an ominous development for the Western world, and certainly it will further radicalize numerous parts of the Islamic World. The balance of power between the Somalis and the Amharas has not been well studied in the West. The Oromos may outnumber both nations, but are not directly involved in the balance of power, as they are more related with continental parts of Central Africa.

When the Amhara power is high, the Somalis are divided; when the Somali power is high, the small Amhara state is cut off the maritime communications main lines and the Red Sea and Horn of Africa coasts.

For either Europe or America, it would be extremely wrong to stick to the traditional colonial policy of unreserved favoritism of the Amhara illiteracy against the Somali open-mindedness; over-generalizing situations is not a wise method of effectively solving problems.

The Islamic Courts of Justice in Southern Somalia have just been the reaction to a great number of disastrous colonial policies that antedate the US involvement in the 90s. The Somalis in general are tolerant and broadminded; they would never stand the Islamists for long, except if some external force pushed them to do so.

The Somalis offer America far greater number of important reasons to select them as potential ally than the semi-barbaric Amharas; this is well known to many Kinijit Amharas who try to cover it under the veil of their megalomaniac imperialism of the impoverished and the illiterate.

It is greatly important to read the mail’s next parts carefully; there is clear evidence of Kinijit’s lack of the most elementary democratic concepts, attitudes and programs. The equal rights to ethnic groups become just "fake equal rights to ethnicities", and – how comical – the ‘return of the Amharas to power’ is hypothesized to bring back the situation of the old days of monarchical or communist tyranny: to follow the author’s words, "Ethiopia is going to be the most powerful nation like before and kinijit will bring back eritrea because eritrean regime has been a failure too"!

Now, to what extent Haile Selassie’s or Mengistu’s Abyssinia (ridiculously re-baptized as ‘Ethiopia’) was ‘powerful’ we know only too well; the meager and starving country could not dare a standoff with Egypt over the Nile water flow, and it has never been able to build a dam in the Blue Nile, which would allow genuine development.

The weakness of Abyssinia is entirely due to the insignificance of the Amhara and Tigray tyrannical, paranoiac, and self-disastrous leadership. Even defeated in 1967, Egypt was too powerful for the bogus-emperor Haile Selassie’s pseudo-country to confront. Of course, this reality is known to the numerous oppressed peoples of the Cenotaph ‘Ethiopia’, who would deserve a far better fate; they know that a small but free and democratic Oromia would be far stronger than the larger but internally weak and hollow tyranny of ‘Ethiopia’.

The mail’s author makes then a personal confession; he is the offspring of a mixed marriage; but he opted to side with the Amharas (his mother’s side) than with the Oromos (his father’s side). This is absolutely his right; no one would reproach anything. He can choose to be an Amhara. What is not acceptable is that he intends to be a Neo-Nazi Amhara willing to extirpate from other peoples their Right to Freedom, Independence and Democracy.

He says: "there will never be independent oromia, no ogadenia, no abyssinia, no anuak, nothing!!! we are all one!!!"; this is precisely what he does not understand that it is not his right to speak for anyone else except himself! And quite contrarily to his daydreaming, anytime there would be a referendum for all the oppressed peoples of Abyssinia to express their will, less than 25% would vote in favour of staying together. And this is the critical issue for America and Europe; trying to keep together the elements of the Islamic Terror Volcano ‘Ethiopia’, they will simply make it explode – in the worst possible way!

He then embarks on giving fallacious figures for the different nations that are tyrannically laced together within the (so repeatedly cursed by them) borders of Abyssinia. I would comment, if there were not a crucial point that makes everything very clear. The author tries to divide the country into two categories following my approach, and employing my terms, ‘Abyssinian’ (I would say ‘Semitic’) and ‘Ethiopian’ (I would say ‘Kushitic’). Thus he tries to prove something extremely wrong, namely that there is a Kushitic – Semitic balance in Abyssinia. This is of course fallacious, as Semitic populations of all sorts (Amhara, Tigray, etc.) do not exceed 35% of the total population, but this does not matter.

His argument is like that of a Russian saying "the Russians are Slavs, the Ukrainians are Slavs, the Poles are Slavs, and so all must be ruled by the Russians"; laughable!

And certainly the Amharas do not exceed 19 – 20% at the most. Even worse, he does not speak of the religious divide that, if the international community further tolerates tyrannical, Christian Monophysitic Abyssinian, either Amhara or Tigray, governments in Abyssinia, will explode.

The details he gives about the religious denominations of the Oromos are also wrong; Muslims total approximately 50% of the Oromos, 10% believe in the traditional Oromo religion Waaqefanna, and about 40% of them became Christian, mainly Catholic and Protestant. Very few Oromos are ‘Orthodox’ (a term still in use for the Monophysitic Abyssinian church).

At the end, he mentions a term that deserves more analysis: Shewans. The misinterpretation and false identification of the people of Shoa (Shewa) has been at the epicenter of the Oromo – Amhara divide. That is why we will dedicate a separate article to this issue.

Note
Typical deeds of the Amhara tyranny in Eritrea; shall we accept an Amhara Kinijit comeback?