Mulatu Teshome Interview in Turkish Daily Zaman – the Neo-Nazi Dogma of Fake ‘Ethiopia’

In an earlier article, under the title ‘Neo-Nazi ´Ethiopian´ Pseudo-diplomats: Unrepresentative Liars’ (http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/57805), we unveiled the critical issue of the unrepresentative character of the fake diplomats of Abyssinia, Africa’s worst tyranny that has been fallaciously re-baptized as ‘Ethiopia’.

In fact, 95% of the fake ‘Ethiopian’ diplomats originate from an ethno-religious group that totals just 18% of the entire country’s population, being thus unrepresentative and even dangerous, as they view their position as an instrument for the further implementation of racist, discriminatory and exterminatory policies as regards Abyssinia’s subjugated and tyrannized nations and ethno-religious groups, namely the Oromos, the Ogadenis, the Afars, the Agaws, the Anuak, the Sidamas, the Shekachos, the Kaffas, the Kambattas, and the Wolayitas, and all the Muslim Amhara and Tigray Abyssinians.

In the aforementioned article, we published a first part of our criticism of the interview given to the English medium Turkish daily Zaman by the ambassador of the Monophysitic (heretic Christian) Amhara and Tigray Abyssinians, who pathetically and treacherously portrays himself as ‘ambassador’ of all the tyrannized nations and ethno-religious groups of that country.

We will complete our criticism in the present article, revealing the Neo-Nazi nature of the historical – political dogma that the tyrannical Abyssinian elite brutally and savagely has persistently attempted to impose throughout ‘Ethiopia’. We will first republish the part of the interview that we have not criticized and analyzed in the previous article, and then we will expand in the commentary. In the interview text, there are numbers encrusted that refer to the comments.

Mr. Mulatu Teshome’s Interview can be found in the following link: http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=137148.

Abyssinian Ambassador Mulatu Teshome’s Interview (uncommented part)

………………………………………………………………………………………….

- Every country has its problems. What do you see as the main ones Ethiopia faces?

- Ethiopia is lucky to have a very diverse society. All of these different ethnicities say they belong to their tribes, but when it comes to their country they are all Ethiopian. 25 They have only one roof over them, and that roof is Ethiopia. 26 Having said that, we of course had problems in the past and we still have some. These come mainly in the form of terrorist groups 27 which are manipulated mainly from abroad.

- Are these separatist groups or otherwise?

- Well, these groups don't have civilian demands. 28 Sometimes they use the slogans of a given regime or ethnic group and demand more freedom and more economic development. We have no problem with that. What we are against is taking up arms and sabotaging the security of the population. 29 Unfortunately most of these terrorist groups are linked to Eritrea. 30 You know, Eritrea was a province of Ethiopia in the past, 31 and today it is cultivating these elements within Ethiopia. 32

- What is the reason for this enmity?

- Eritrea was once a province of Ethiopia. It received independence through a referendum in 1991. Before that there was not a clear boundary, because Eritrea was a part of Ethiopia. 33 The division between Eritrea and Ethiopia is not ethnic or national. That part of Ethiopia was occupied by the Italians for 63 years and during the occupation they developed a separate identity. Today the two identities are clashing. 34

- When we speak of Ethiopia, we use the term "Gateway of Africa." Does this label seem accurate to you? 35

- I think it is quite accurate. Geographically its location in the northeastern part of Africa makes Ethiopia best placed strategically in its region. 36 You can fly easily from there to the Middle East, to Asia and to Europe. Of course, this is facilitated by Ethiopian Airlines. It flies to almost all countries in Africa. In addition, the headquarters of the African Union is in Ethiopia; 37 the headquarters of the UN's Economic Commission for Africa is also in Addis Ababa. 38 And many international regional headquarters are there. So basically Ethiopia is the capital of Africa. 39

- When were diplomatic relations between Ethiopia and Turkey established?

- Our relations reach back to the Ottoman period, to the 1560s. But real diplomatic relations started just before World War I. 40 Ethiopia had very close contacts with the sultan of the Ottomans at that time, and in 1912 a Turkish Consulate was opened in Ethiopia. Ethiopia was the only independent country in Africa then 41 and it was the only country recognized as a state. In 1925 Turkey opened its embassy in Addis Ababa. Turkey was the sixth country to open an embassy in Ethiopia. 42 Ethiopia also had an embassy in Ankara. Our emperor, Haile Selassie, visited Turkey two times. But in 1975, after the socialist revolution, Ethiopia closed down its embassy. For a long time we didn't have a presence in Ankara; we reopened our embassy only in 2006. Today the relations between Turkey and Ethiopia are excellent, both politically and economically. We have no conflicts of interest and we support each other on international platforms. 43 We are enjoying strong economic relations and witnessing a growing number of Turkish investors coming to Ethiopia. Our mutual trade has grown from nothing to approximately $200 million annually, and our target is $500 million.

- When we speak about Ethiopians in Turkey, the Queen of Sheba comes to mind. Is this a myth or a historical reality? 44

- The Queen of Sheba is not a myth. 45 If you go to the northern part of Ethiopia, to Aksu, 46 you can see the ruins of her palace. 47 She was the empress of Ethiopia 48 and having heard of a powerful emperor in the north, she visited Solomon. 49 They fell in love and on her way back to Ethiopia she became pregnant. After she returned she gave birth to a boy and named him Menelik. Menelik I was the emperor, the son of Solomon. 50 That line actually ruled Ethiopia until 1975. 51

- So the family of the emperor is the family of Solomon. Does the family still have social and religious importance in Ethiopia?

- From the first emperor to the last, they were highly respected and were considered gods among people. The emperor was called King of Kings, Elect of God, Lion of Judah, Emperor of Emperors. 52 After 1975 that respect faded; the members of the royal family left the country, some were imprisoned and even after their release they left for England and the US. Some, of course, returned after the change in political regime, but as only common citizens. They are no longer a threat to the democracy. They know that the Lion of Judah is not going to return to power.

- The Ark of the Covenant is in Ethiopia also? 53

- It is in Ethiopia, again in Aksu. Every year on Nov. 28 or 29 Ethiopians organize a very big celebration around the temple where the ark is kept. Not only the ark, but also the true cross, as people call it, is in Ethiopia. So there is potential for religious tourism. I invite Turks to come and invest in Ethiopia, but also to visit Lake Tana, 54 the source of the Blue Nile, and our national parks. Ethiopia's natural beauty, in my opinion, is not comparable to that of any other country in the world.

Comments

25. This is another lie; it actually reflects the unrepresentative pseudo-ambassador’s deep desire and the Neo-Nazi Abyssinian elite’s secret wish, namely that their tyranny manages to achieve the level of completed spiritual genocide that would result in loss of national identity of the Oromos, the Ogadenis, the Afars, the Agaws, the Anuak, the Sidamas, the Shekachos, the Kaffas, the Kambattas, and the Wolayitas, and all the Muslim Amhara and Tigray Abyssinians. In fact, the national, cultural and religious identity of all the aforementioned nations and ethno-religious groups, in and by itself, gravely and laterally contradicts, opposes and rejects the Neo-Nazi dogma that Mr. Mulatu Teshome tries to defend, namely that of a united "Ethiopia".

The reason is simple; forget the fake name of ‘Ethiopia’ and you immediately realize that all that you have in front of you is a number of mainly Kushitic (Ethiopian) nations (totaling 70% of the entire population) that have been subjugated by the Semitic Abyssinians, the Yemenite origin Amharas and Tigrays (together they make 30% of the population, but are divided to two groups, namely 1. the tyrannized Muslims and 2. the state controlling and benefit monopolizing Monophysites).

The state consists in a totalitarian machine that imposes absolute Monophysitic Abyssinian culture, thus alienating and utterly despising the Muslim Abyssinians (40% of the Abyssinians, which means 12% of the country’s entire population).

Through use of the pseudonym "Ethiopia" that refers to the area of Ancient Sudan and to the Kushitic populations that lived and developed a great civilization there, the Neo-Nazi Abyssinian elites try to demonstrate that the country is democratically unified, authentic in its identity, and possible to remain united. It is all an aberration.

In fact, all the oppressed nations deeply resent the invaders and want to achieve national independence; they have not forgotten the massacres that completed the Abyssinian invasions of their lands, and the dehumanizing tyranny to which they have long been exposed. There was nothing democratic in Abyssinia – Fake ‘Ethiopia’.

If Abyssinia were truly Ethiopia…

A name never guarantees the authenticity, as it can be fake like the savagely and distortedly imposed ‘Ethiopia’. If the Abyssinian tyranny were truly Ethiopia, Afaan Oromo would be the official language, Addis Ababa would be called correctly Finfinne, Waqqefanna would be the official religion, Gadaa system would be of rigor, and there would not be sacrilegious, heretic, Monophysitic temples built in any province except the Amhara and Tigray regions.

26. So disparate and incongruent the country is that the Neo-Nazi Abyssinian elite, collectively responsible for the imposition of the racist, discriminatory and inhuman tyranny, has to persistently threaten any "citizen" of the misfortunate realm, who would dare say that "Ethiopia" is not the "roof" – except that of an immense and repugnant jail.

27. No one believes the criminal lies of the pseudo-ambassador. The trick is too old to still work. You cannot accuse as terrorist anyone who disagrees with you, because this proves that you are a Neo-Nazi dictator who criminally intends to prolong the illegal administration imposed on the majority, all those who reject you. In fact, the only terrorists in fake ‘Ethiopia’ are the Abyssinian elites, their thugs, administration and diplomats.

28. This is pathetic and ludicrous; certainly the national liberation fronts have national, not civilian, demands. Someone should say to the fake diplomat of the fake country that ‘Ethiopia’ has no credentials of legal existence. It is an outlaw state made up out of blood-shedding invasions, slavery trade, genocidal intentions and practices, and unprecedented tyranny. If Human Rights and the Principles of Humanism are respected allover the world for one day, that day will be the last for the inhuman colonial fabrication ‘Ethiopia’.

Security in ‘Ethiopia’: when in Trance or in the Morgue

29. The security of the population was never a matter of the slightest concern among the incredibly bestial and lewd Abyssinian elite – except we talk about the security of the Monophysitic Abyssinians who constitute ca. 18% of the country’s population. For the rest, ‘security’ equals absolute submission to directives, servility of racial character, abolition of national and cultural identity, compact oblivion of the historical past, and benevolent acceptance of ancestors’ murders perpetrated by the ancestors of those demanding the prolongation of the submission.

Security is a ridiculous word in fake ‘Ethiopia’, one should say to the pathetic representative of Abyssinia’s tyrannical elite; in fact, there are two types of security there:
- security when in trance, and
- security when in morgue.

East African Terrorists: Meles Zenawi’s Soldiers

30. There is no terrorist group linked to Eritrea, and the pseudo-ambassador fails to provide with any further details; the reason is simple: there are no proofs and details given. The statement is unsubstantiated propaganda of the lowest level.

The only terrorists existing in Eastern Africa are the thuggish mercenaries of the Abyssinian elites, who impersonate the ‘national army’ and indiscriminately rape women in the streets and the fields of Ogaden, murder elders and children in Oromia, destroy properties in Afar Land, and burn fields and forests in Sidama Land, turning the African jungle to lunar landscape.

Eritrea was never Abyssinian Territory

31. This is not the whole truth; Eritrea’s territory was never part of Abyssinia, except in the Axumite Abyssinian kingdom’s times, when the coast (Adulis, in the area of today’s Massawa) was wealthier and more influential than the inland (Axum). In modern times, Eritrea’s territory was part of the Ottoman Empire, until it was transferred to the Egyptian khedive, and then colonized by the Italians. The tiny local kingdom of Hamasien was always in war with the Abyssinian kingdom of Gondar. It was not a ‘brotherland’ as falsely Pankhurst pretended in order to falsify the History of Eastern Africa.

In fact, the Abyssinian control of Eritrea lasted only four decades, 1950 – 1991. It started with an irrelevant UN plebiscite that did not take into consideration the Eritreans’ will, and it turned out to be a parody when the federated territory was peremptorily annexed and the local parliament dissolved by the criminal Abyssinian king Haile Selassie. Abyssinia has no right to claim for this territory under any circumstances whatsoever.

32. This clearly demonstrates how irrelevant the pseudo-ambassador of fake ‘Ethiopia’ is. Despite its conflict with Abyssinia, there is no need for Eritrea to ‘cultivate these elements within’ Abyssinia. The ‘elements’ are quite self-cultivated; they are the immediate result of the indigenous nations’ genuine will to achieve independence and terminate the illegal and inhuman Abyssinian control over their fatherlands, namely Afar Land, Oromia, Sidama Land, Ogaden, Kaffa, Anuak Land, etc.

33. As we already said, Eritrea was never a part of Abyssinia throughout the 2nd millennium, except for the period 1950 – 1991. Eritrea is a country with totally different national, cultural, linguistic and religious profile than Abyssinia – either we limit the latter to the historical nucleus of the Amhara and Tigray or we view it within its present boundaries that were formed following the colonial invasions of the late 19th century Abyssinian kings.

The lies of the unrepresentative ‘Ethiopian’ ambassador can be easily revealed: he admits that Eritrea was occupied by Italy. Well, who were in control of Eritrea before the Italians arrived in 1885? The answer is simple: the Egyptian Khedive (Viceroy) who took control of this formerly Ottoman province in 1865.

And the Ottoman control had lasted for more than 300 years without a single Abyssinian ‘king’ having been able to see the Red Sea African coast – even not with binoculars!!!

When the soldiers of Sultan Suleyman the Magnificent arrived in Massawa (in 1557), Ottoman rule supplanted local administrators who had been governing the country as province of the Islamic Caliphate. As the Ottoman Sultan had acquired the insignia of the Caliphate (since Selim’s invasion of Cairo in 1517), no one had any objection to the Ottoman rule, as the majority of the African coastland population was Muslim since the early Islamic days.

No Continuity between Axum and Modern Abyssinia

Only before 640 CE was the Eritrean coastland part of the Aksumite Abyssinian kingdom, but there is no continuity between that kingdom and the modern Abyssinian tyrannical rulers who ridiculously pretend to form a so-called ‘Solomonic’ dynasty.

That’s why it is historically erroneous and politically unacceptable to call the vulgar tyrant Menelik as "Menelik II", because there had never been a historical king named "Menelik I".

The Kebra Negast story about the Queen of Sheba (the so-called Makeda) is a late ideological fabrication that contradicts earlier philological and historical data and lacks any support from archeological evidence.

The palace excavated at Aksum was not that of the Queen of Sheba, and there is no historical proof that the palace in question had been considered as ‘palace of the Queen of Sheba’ by any Axumite Abyssinian.

34. The two identities were always clashing, the Eritrean and the Abyssinian, since the early Islamic days, when the coastland populations adhered to Islam, and Monophysitic, heretic Axum was isolated in the inland.

35. Very comical "gateway" indeed! A landlocked country cannot – by definition – be the gateway of a continent. Can we consider Slovakia as "Gateway of Europe"? What about calling Kyrgyzstan "Gateway of Asia" and Paraguay "Gateway of America"? It would be ridiculous.

The same is valid for the unrepresentative ambassador’s statement about Abyssinia. Real gateway of Africa may be South Africa, Nigeria, Egypt, eventually Kenya, and to a lesser extent Morocco.

Somalia has chances to be viewed as "Gateway of Africa"; Abyssinia, fallaciously re-baptized Ethiopia, has none.

36. Strategic position in Northeastern Africa is something that concerns (for different reasons for every case) Egypt, Somalia, Kenya, eventually Sudan and Eritrea. The geo-strategic importance of Abyssinia does match that of Chad.

The lake Tana area is not a strategic place by itself; if a country that dominates that area controls the coastland and the Bab el Mandeb straits, then certainly that country has a geo-strategic importance.

For fake ‘Ethiopia’, in order to acquire this sort of significance, it would take to annex Eritrea, Djibouti and parts of Somalia. Eritrea alone has greater geo-strategic importance than fake ‘Ethiopia’.

However, a discussion about the strategic position of a country reflects only considerations about its potentialities. But if that country is a tyrannical realm of oppressed nations engaged in ceaseless internal strife like Abyssinia, all the potentialities are lost.

37. This reflects two realities: a) colonial background that played a determinant role in the emergence of the next phase, the postcolonial era, and b) Egyptian customary indifference for Africa and focus on the Arab League and the Middle East.

38. This is not to propagate much; its endeavours did not help even the hosting country! Ethiopia is at the bottom of the world’s poorest countries.

A Capital Center for Africa: the Kushitic Confederation

39. In fact, Africa has no capital; and this is the result of the colonial divisions that characterize the postcolonial era as well. Certainly, at the international level, South Africa, Egypt and Nigeria are more influential than Abyssinia – fake ‘Ethiopia’.

To some extent the lack of an African ‘capital’ is due to the existence of the colonial relic of fake ‘Ethiopia’. However, with the liberation of the Kushitic Oromos and Sidamas, with the self-determination of Darfur, and with the emergence of a Berberic country in the African Atlas, the colonial structures of disfigurement – ‘Ethiopia’, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Chad, Niger, Morocco, Mali and Mauritania – will collapse and a great and authentic Kushitic Confederation will rise, covering the entire span of Northern Africa from the Atlantic to the Indian Ocean.

40. This is an indirect refutation of the earlier claims to Abyssinian historical prevalence in Eritrea’s present territory. How the tiny and isolated Abyssinian kingdom entered in contacts with the Ottoman Empire in 1557 (not 1560, ignorant!)? Did the Abyssinians send a delegation? No! They did not have regular contacts even with Alodia, the last Christian Ethiopian state in the area of today’s Sudan, which collapsed around 1600. The Abyssinian contacts with the Coptic Patriarchate were extremely limited, and there would not be any occasion for a representative of such a tiny, marginal and peripheral state like Abyssinia to send a delegation to the then center of the world, Istanbul.

The Abyssinians came to contact with the Ottoman soldiers who assumed their responsibilities in the Eastern African coastal provinces of the Islamic Caliphate that were rightfully brought under the rule of the Sultan. The Ottoman border was at a distance of ca. 200 kilometers from the lake Tana. This is the contact the unrepresentative and ignorant ‘ambassador’ is talking about!

41. It was an Ottoman consulate, not Turkish; Turkey was incepted in 1919 – 1922.

42. This fact shows how marginal and unimportant Abyssinia was by then; it was actually a laboratory of Death and Dearth whereby the recently subjugated nations were exposed to physical and spiritual extermination. In fact, the country had been allowed to expand only due to British colonial interests of containment of the Italian colonial expansionism.

43. There are many points that oppose Turkey and the colonial relic of fake ‘Ethiopia’ in Africa, and the first to mention is Somalia’s integrity and peace in the Horn of Africa region. In this regard, it is of seminal importance to note that for Turkey there is no reason for secessionist pseudo-states like Puntland or Somaliland to exist.

Queen of Sheba: reminds us of Yemen – not Abyssinia or Ethiopia

44. The question of the Turkish journalist was certainly pre-arranged through a particular demand of the unrepresentative ‘ambassador’. In Turkey, no a single person, while thinking of the Queen of Sheba, known mainly through Coranic sources (for the average public) and eventually through modern literature (for the erudite public), brings Abyssinia in mind.

All Turks speaking of Belkis (Queen of Sheba is known among Muslims through this name which was given in numerous Islamic sources) bring Yemen in their mind.

The same applies worldwide to all Muslims, and to all Christians and Jews. Sheba was a Yemenite state, and the story of the legendary trip of the Queen of Sheba to Jerusalem fascinated always Jews, Christians, and Muslims.

But there is nothing about Abyssinia (or Ethiopia, which concerns Sudan, the territory known to the Greco-Roman world as Ethiopia).

There is an Islamic tradition in Sudan about the Queen of Sheba sailing through the Red Sea to reach Israel and stopping overnight in Suakin (50 km in the south of Port Sudan), where all the queen’s harem were left pregnant due to the attraction of the Jinn of the area (Suakin according to an etymology means ‘place of Jinn’), but again nothing about Abyssinia.

All the distortions contained in Kebra Negast are rejected by worldwide academia as later falsifications unworthy of historical value.

Queen of Sheba: not a Historical Person

45. The Queen of Sheba is not History, there was no text left that was written by or about her, during her time. History means contemporaneous epigraphic evidence and literature. All the rest are later legends and mystifications that have absolutely no face value as historical records. The Kebra Negast story of Makeda is – to put it correctly – the falsification of a legendary, not even a historical person.

46. Axum, written mistakenly in Zaman, certainly led the readers to a confusion; without the final letter (m), and written as Aksu, the distorted name of the Ancient Abyssinian capital means in Turkish ‘white water’! The lazy pseudo-ambassador did not manage to learn Turkish, and thus did not demand any corrections and proofreading. Fearing an eventual Turkish invitation to the Somali leader Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed, the Abyssinian tyrannical administration tried to setup a tribal embassy at Ankara and make it function in a really miserable way; but who said that dictators can always have talented diplomats?

47. The excavated palace at Axum belonged to Axumite kings who lived 800 to 1200 years after the Queen of Sheba had died in Yemen. It’s ridiculous to attribute it to the Yemenite Queen. After all, one could also attribute it to extraterrestrials, being thus more… convincing!

Scandalous Falsification of History: Basis of the Neo-Nazi Dogma of Abyssinia

48. Sheba is in Yemen, and the Queen of Sheba was never a ruler either in Ethiopia (today’s Sudan) or Abyssinia. It is scandalous for an ambassador to take his country’s myths at historical face value, and pretend that they represent ‘History’; if it is a matter of ignorance, he simply defames his country.

If it is a premeditated act on which later claims for territorial expansion and subjugation of other nations are based, it consists in threat for regional security and disrespect for Human Rights.

If this fallacy becomes a national dogma to be tyrannically imposed on other subjugated nations, the unrepresentative ambassador’s false assumption becomes strong proof of racism and Neo-Nazism.

49. Of course, the Israelite King is totally unrelated to the Abyssinian dynasties that emerged 2300 years after he died, and comically claimed to be an offspring of Solomon (the so-called Solomonic dynasty)!

It is as if today one Malay pretends to be descendant – without any other historical proof – of Alexander the Great, King of Macedonia!!!

There is no Abyssinian Historical Continuity - Menelik I is a Mythical Fabrication

50. This is another fabrication fallaciously composed by the author of Kebra Negast. There is not a single proof about the existence of a son to both, Solomon and the Queen of Sheba.

And there is no point of naming that mythical person Menelik I, as there can never be any no 2 (Menelik II) to a …. mythical person. The effort itself shows a mentally debilitated person who believes that stupid lies can ever be taken seriously and believed by others!

It is as if one author today composes a History of Kings of Rome, and makes of the mythical founder of Rome, Romus, a supposedly historical king called Romus I, only to allow others pretend that a modern person in our times, renamed as Romus II, can be the descendant of the first!

Criminal Gangster Menelik (not II !): the Filthiest of the Filthy

51. This is the most illusory, fallacious, and deceptive part of the bogus-historical dogma of Abyssinia; it testifies to the racist and discriminatory character of the official state ideology that has continually been tyrannically imposed on a multitude of subjugated nations for whom Kebra Negast, pseudo-Menelik I, and the criminal gangster Menelik (not II !) are the filthiest of the filthy, the most perverse of the perverse, and the unholiest of the unholy.

52. The royal titles pale if compared with those of Iran, Babylon, Assyria and Egypt, but in the same way Ramses III (‘Sa Ra’; ‘son of the – supreme god – Ra) was not son of the god, the illiterate and uncouth Abyssinian kings were not "King of Kings, Elect of God, Lion of Judah, Emperor of Emperors".

They were just barbaric cannibals and they fully demonstrated their appalling and inhuman nature by implementing their genocidal policies against the nations they subjugated.

53. Another fake question that the unrepresentative ambassador suggested to the journalist in order to answer falsely and thus promote tourism in his ailing tyranny. In a separate article, we will focus on the subject.

54. Last point to comment in this ridiculous interview is the racist predilection for the lake Tana at the heart of the Amhara province.

- Why does the supposed ambassador of all the citizens of fake ‘Ethiopia’ not invite Turks to visit the lake Awasa of Sidama Land, the pasturelands of Oromia, the rivers of Kaffa and Anuak lands, and the desert of Ogaden for a nice safari?

Because he does not represent but his tribal interests, and his Amhara and Tigray compatriots and coreligionists. All the rest of his country, i.e. 82% of the entire population, are for him insects meant to disappear sooner or later.

Conclusion – Call for Immediate Reaction

We cannot afford to allow this fallacious interview misinform the Turkish readership.

I call you all to immediately protest writing mails and forwarding the present article to Pinar Vurucu, editor of Zaman.

Say that, when the Ogadeni Muslims are butchered, the Somalis mercilessly executed, the Afar and the Oromo Muslims imprisoned, all the Sidamas, the Anuak, the Kaffas and all the rest dehumanized, the Turkish leading pro-Islamic newspaper, Zaman, cannot publish the lies of the unrepresentative pseudo-ambassador who thus pursues his Neo-Nazi agenda.

Write now to Pinar Vurucu at: p.vurucu@todayszaman.com

Note
Picture: Massawa as part of the Ottoman (not Abyssinian) heriatge