Guess who’s Coming to Dinner! Your Terrorist Neighbor!

For many long years, I wondered whether the rising number of Muslim immigrants in Europe and in England would be finally able to pertinently integrate in the Western societies.

My question had nothing to do with the Western societies’ materialism, consumerism or pan-sexism that have corrupted, mentally and morally, the West European and North American world. My doubts mostly emanated from the detrimental ignorance of the ‘Other’ that, although castigated as real curse, is omnipresent and overwhelming.

I never changed my mind in this regard; more than the statesmen, and the military, the administrations and the academia, the intellectuals and the spiritual leaders of the West, the average populations, the Western societies in themselves are indifferent to the realities of ‘other’.

Despite so many universities, so numerous faculties, thousands of specialized reviews, hundreds of thousands of books, millions of tourists…..

The absolute darkness in which Londoners, Parisians, Romans, and Berliners find themselves when it comes to their respective Pakistani, Moroccan, Tunisian, and Turkish neighbors does not start in their European capitals. It starts in their tourist destinations, i.e. in Taxila, Volubilis, Carthage and Ephesus to name some examples.

When Europeans travel to Muslim countries, they never care about getting an idea of the social life, the behavioural system, the mental predisposition, the beliefs and the thoughts of the local people, among whom some immigrated and now live in Europe and America. They do not bother to cross for an hour – not more than just an hour – an average district of the city they visit. Without the stupid tour leader and the official guide who will of course disorient them, showing them the very few and hardly accepted by Western standards districts of capitals and big cities in the Middle East.

The result is that these ill-fated European tourists miss an excellent opportunity to see where their neighbors lived before relocating in the West, and sharing a view on the same square with them.

How can a Londoner really understand what it means for his Egyptian neighbor to live in Camden, without a … nice promenade in Zawya al Hamra where this Egyptian had lived 25 years before moving to London?

The average Western societies ignore everything about the Islamic Terror laboratories, e.g. the miserably poor districts with streets crossed by open-air sewerage, with garbage bags tore up by the beggars, jobless and homeless who are fed on it, with detrimentally polluted air because of the open garbage being either uncollected for many days or burnt, and with filthy people who do not wash their clothes but once per month, and do not take a shower but once per week.

The Dimensions of the Western Ignorance

The Western ignorance is nothing the Islamic terrorists, the destitute local masses of the Islamic World or the extremist sheikhs can be blamed for.

The reason for the aforementioned statement is simple; only a student who studied a subject can be held responsible for passing or not an exam on this subject. If you never studied Medicine, who could blame you for being unable to carry out a surgery?

Subsequently, a mere comparison of two worlds, the West and the Islam, would suffice to let us understand the chaotic difference that exists between the academically advanced – in Humanities, and this matters more – West and the quasi-illiterate bogus-academia of the tyrannical countries. This indicates immediately what part should be held responsible for the non adequate understanding of the ‘Other’; it is essential not to be confused about the extent of the ignorance, darkness and obscurantism within which the Islamic World has been plunged. No one should try to compare it to emancipated, free, inquisitive West. There may be inconsistencies and inadequacies, missing points and mendacity among the Western academia, but one thing is clear:

- The Islamic Science as a method to systematize knowledge and improve understanding through exploration, experiment, analysis and synthesis ended before 400 years – which means at a time when the West has just embarked on developing its own system of systematic Knowledge, which is the still existing – incomplete and impertinent – one!

The Western Ignorance needs immediate remedy in a number of sectors:

1. Academic Context
- Sociology and Social Anthropology
- Ethnography
- Literature and Sociology of Literature
- Linguistics
- History of Religion
- Ancient Oriental Civilizations
- Ottoman Empire and the rise of Colonialism in Africa and in Asia

2. Journalist – Mass Media - Context
- Daily life in poor districts of cities, towns and villages
- Description of the behavioural system in detail, with focus on Women’s affairs
- Analytical profiles, interviews and snapshots on ethnic, linguistic and religious minorities’ conditions of life
- Extensive translations of (excerpts from or entire) Khutbahs (Sermons given on the occasion of Friday prayers)

It is essential to underscore that all the aforementioned endeavours have to be carried out without any involvement form the part of the tyrannical governments of the Middle East that pursue extensive simulation tactics, trying to profile themselves as anti-terrorist, whereas they genuinely contribute to the rise of Islamic Extremism and Terrorism.

This is what the Western societies must impose on their ailing elites, administrations and governments: Trust must be built first, but before that, the necessary knowledge must be acquired. And Trust cannot be built but with the simple average people, not the lewd, analphabetic and barbaric tyrants of the Middle Eastern realms.

Western Naivety at its best!

As we refer to Trust, we have to mention an interesting article published in the London Times by Minette Marrin, under the title ‘The challenge for peaceful Muslims"(http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/minette_marrin/article2042245.ece). Ms. Marrin raises precisely the same subject, the lack of Trust between the Western native populations and the Muslim immigrants.

Ms. Marrin reveals all the limits of the Western approach and knowledge – for which only the Western societies stand accused. An indicative excerpt of her perception of the Muslim immigrants reads as following:

"The great majority of law-abiding Muslims feel understandably resentful and fearful about that. What’s probably worse, I suspect, is the growing resentment among nonMuslims about the terrible damage that Islamist terror does to us all and the failure of Muslim families and congregations – I will not speak of so-called community leaders – to do much about it."

The easiest answer to be said to this statement is that the resentful non Muslims, instead of spending 20 days in a Moroccan beach, should rather fly to Amman, and thence every day move to nearby Zarqa to explore the misery of the streets, the cafeterias, the people and the garbage of that laboratory of Islamic Terror. Perhaps they will not enjoy their holidays, but when back in Pimlico they will have a very precise idea about the possible original house, neighborhood, and environment of their terrorist neighbors. They will not have a problem inviting them for dinner whereby they could even describe to the gullible Europeans the plan of the Ultimate Islamization of the West in meticulously detailed narrations.

Islamic Terror: the European Elites’ Conspiracy of Silence

Thus, average Western populations will outmaneuver their elites’ conspiracy of silence, and they will understand that there is no "

Of course, I do not believe that the uneducated and barbaric, dehumanized masses of Arabic speaking populations "failed to do something" with the Islamic Terrorism. To fail to do something with a problem presupposes that you first perceive it as a problem, and second you get engaged on a certain plan. Acting under these conditions only, you may either fail or succeed.

This is not the case of your Muslim neighbor, the famous Muslim families and congregations; they don’t view Islamic Terror as a problem, and they have no means, no thoughts, no theoretical background and no intentions to do anything with it.

The problem lies elsewhere; let’s read another excerpt form the same article:

"There are Muslims who believe that their faith does not require women to cover their faces and there are Muslims who are convinced that it does. There are plenty of British Muslims who support the institutions of this country but there are plenty who think we should live under sharia."

Islamic Moderates vs. Terrorists: Wrong! Why?

The author implies the existence of two categories of Muslims, namely the radical – extremist – pro-totalitarian and the so-called ‘moderate’ ones. This is a completely deceitful approach. And it is deceitful because

1. At the moment it gives the idea of two existing poles within Islam, there is only one at the theoretical – philosophical – theological – ideological – intellectual level. The so-called moderates are not a theoretical pole in juxtaposition to the extremists.

2. The non extremists do not belong to or form one group but consist in a great variety of ideas, groups, individuals, beliefs, attitudes and organizations with many of them mendaciously confusing their Western interlocutors.

3. Even worse, none of the non – extremists descends form a historical Islamic philosophical system that would be effective as theoretical – philosophical counterbalance of the Islamic Terrorists and Extremists, who originate from an Islamic minority, a marginal and perverse group of the first centuries of Islam.

4. Not a single Muslim understands what happened in Islam, namely the fact that, through the establishment of successive perverse and counterfeit theoretical heresies – that were all rejected in their times by the outright majority of the Muslims, the Caliphatic administration, and the entire range of the great historical Philosophers, Intellectuals, Artists, Erudite Scholars, Scientists and Authors, who only formed the Islamic Civilization –, the real sense of Islam as Civilization, Culture and Religion went lost. Due to the gradual expansion and final totalitarian imposition of the systems of Hanbal, Ibn Taimiya, and Abdel Wahhab, what was left as Islam is a bogus-Islam that has nothing to do with the preaching of Prophet Muhammad.

5. In fact, all those among the academic and religious institutions of Islam, who ascribe themselves to what is viewed or thought as moderate Islam, simply belong to (and believe in) the aforementioned line of theoretical systems of backward Barbarism and de-Islamization that were established by Hanbal, Ibn Taimiya and Abdel Wahhab. Their system is terrorist, discriminatory and criminally antihuman, even if they try to mollify it. Their attitude is ‘politics in religion’, tactics, diplomatic attitudes and all that the raw and uneducated masses just reject.

- And who can trust them, as long as they do not dare to confront the hysterical masses of the streets who are the basic supporters of the Islamic Terrorism?

- And who can believe they are not terrorists too, as they do nothing to educate their barbaric and cannibalistic followers who would murder any Jew who would happen to cross their way out of their filthy and Satanic mosque?

6. Last but not least, not a single Western imagines the colossal contribution of the West, mainly the Colonial Powers of England and France, to the rise of the Islamic Terrorism through the machinations devised and implemented, the Hellenism, the Orientalism, the Pan-Arabism, and the Modern Islamism, the four systems of erroneously collected, viciously diffused, provocatively manipulated (at the socio-political level), and detrimentally (for all) misused Knowledge.

Then, if you cannot invite your Terrorist neighbor for dinner, you still have the chance to evoke his ideological co-warriors, namely ‘king’ Abdullah, his ancestor the notorious gangster Ibn Saud, or the worst promoter of Islamic Terror of all times: Napoleon.