FCC to Impose Fines for On-Air Expletives
In a controversial ruling, the Supreme Court announced today that it will allow the FCC to fine broadcasters for any utterance of an on-air expletive, even during live broadcasts.
The Federal Communications Commission won a major battle today in its efforts to control and censor all content that is broadcast on television in the United States. The ruling is applicable to a fairly recent change in FCC Policy. Prior to the change, it was assumed that all broadcasters were allowed to have "one free expletive" during live broadcasts, since it was impractical to try to control that those types of outbursts. The two incidents that seem to be driving the case are Cher's saying of the F-word during an awards show in 2002 and Nicole Ritchie's double expletive during an awards show in 2003.
Some 30 years ago, the Supreme court ruled that the FCC could keep expletives off the air during the hours of 6AM to 10PM, or the times when it was most likely that children could have access to televisions.
With the new ruling, an utterance of the F-word and the S-word, in particular, will be greeted with a fine from the FCC. It is important to note, however, that the Supreme Court ruling only approved of the FCC policy as being legal and reasonable. It did not address the constitutionality of the policy or whether it was in line with the U.S. Constitution's guarantee of freedom of speech.
A ruling on that aspect has been deferred to a circuit court for a ruling and it may be some time before that proceeding plays out in court. In the meantime, celebrities will have to watch what they say during the heat of awards shows.
Some 30 years ago, the Supreme court ruled that the FCC could keep expletives off the air during the hours of 6AM to 10PM, or the times when it was most likely that children could have access to televisions.
With the new ruling, an utterance of the F-word and the S-word, in particular, will be greeted with a fine from the FCC. It is important to note, however, that the Supreme Court ruling only approved of the FCC policy as being legal and reasonable. It did not address the constitutionality of the policy or whether it was in line with the U.S. Constitution's guarantee of freedom of speech.
A ruling on that aspect has been deferred to a circuit court for a ruling and it may be some time before that proceeding plays out in court. In the meantime, celebrities will have to watch what they say during the heat of awards shows.

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- Indecency on Television
- Color Television: History and Timeline
- Facts about Television Violence
- Negative Effects of Television
- The Television In Our Lives: Real vs. Virtual
- Children And The Potential Harmful Effects Of Television
- A Brief History Of Television
- Classic Television: Introduce Your Family Tonight
- 3D Television
- What happened to "Music Television"?
- Who Invented the Television?
- Television Violence and Children
- The Philosophy of Television
- The Awful Truth About Television: TV Corrodes Community and Democracy
- The Awful Truth About Television: The little box that transformed society
- The Awful Truth About Television: Fake News and other reasons not to watch TV news
- The Awful Truth About Television: Why kids NAG
- The Awful Truth About Television: Family time suffers when kids get only 38 minutes of parents' time
- Children’s Educational Television: Children's Television Workshop
- TV Time: How much television do you really watch?



