California Court Supports Ban on Gay Marriage
A court in California ruled Thursday that the state’s existing ban on gay marriage does not violate the constitutional rights of homosexuals.
In the ruling, which reverses a March 2005 ruling of a San Francisco trial judge, the 1st District Court of Appeal agreed with the attorney general of the state, who said that it is the job of the Legislature—not the courts—to change the traditional definition of marriage, which has always been a union between a man and a woman.
"We conclude California's historical definition of marriage does not deprive individuals of a vested fundamental right or discriminate against a suspect class," the court said in their 128-page ruling. "The time may come when California chooses to expand the definition of marriage to encompass same-sex unions. That change must come from democratic processes, however, not by judicial fiat."
The ruling noted that the state’s ban on same-sex marriage cannot be considered discriminatory because of California’s strong domestic partner law, which gives registered couples most of the same rights as married spouses in California. However, Thursday’s ruling will not end the debate over same-sex marriages in California. Advocates of gay marriage have said that they would appeal to the California Supreme Court if the appeals court did not decide in their favor.
Molly McKay, a spokeswoman for Marriage Equality USA, told reporters, "Although we are disappointed, we always knew this issue was going to be decided by the California Supreme Court. We believe that the California Supreme Court will enforce the constitutional guarantee of equality under the law and strike down the discriminatory barriers denying same-sex couples access to civil marriage."
The issue of same-sex marriages has been debated more heatedly in California than any other state. Last March, San Francisco Superior Court Judge Richard Kramer ruled that the state’s existing marriage laws violated the civil rights of gays and lesbians by denying them "the basic human right to marry a person of one’s choice," and said that the laws discriminated on the basis of gender and sexual orientation. Kramer’s decision led to the Legislature becoming the first lawmaking body in the nation to legalize gay marriage. But Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed the bill, saying that it is up to the courts or the voters to settle the issue, not lawmakers.


Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- NY Gay Marriages Declared Legit by Massachusetts Judge
- House Rejects Constitutional Amendment to Ban Gay Marriage
- Spain Becomes the Third European Country to Legalize Gay Marriage
- American Psychiatric Association Supports Legalizing Gay Marriage
- Federal Judge Deems Nebraska’s Gay Marriage Ban Unconstitutional
- ‘Dear Abby’ Supports Gay Marriage
- California Landmark Bill Grants Legality for Gay Marriage
- New York, Georgia High Courts Rule Against Gay Marriage
- Senate Rejects Constitutional Amendment Banning Gay Marriage
- Schwarzenegger Vows to Veto Gay Marriage Bill
- Gay Marriage
- Bush Calls for Gay Marriage to Be Outlawed
- Spain Legalises Gay Marriage
- Gay Marriage Law Alarms Spain's Religious Leaders
- Spanish Church Prepares for Battle on Gay Marriage
- Australia to Ban Gay Marriages
- Massachusetts Performs First Gay Marriages
- Gay Marriage Rights Lead Spanish Pm's Drive for Sexual Equality
- California Court Blocks Gay Marriages
- US State to Allow Gay Marriage
- Pope Calls for Halt to 'evil' Gay Marriages
- Civil Wars: A Battle for Gay Marriage



