Another Iraq War to help the Turkish Islamists?

The US needs Turkey more than Turkey needs the US

We have to add to the overall picture the recent developments between Turkey and the US, namely the US incursion into Turkish aerospace. As a matter of fact, the US administration has fallen victims of the most disastrous advisers whose ability to cause unprecedented damage to the US must be internationally recognized. If America had in Europe a friend, an important country able to engage in a war without being defeated within 48 hours, that country was neither pacifist and quasi-neutralized Germany, nor pompous (and hollow) France, nor unwarlike Italy; it was pugnacious Turkey.

Leaving aside the European weaklings, still today at a moment of an undeniable Russian comeback, the US – all accounts made as regards 3 dozens of European states – can count only on Turkey, Poland, and (taken as an island) the UK. This is definitely not much. At a moment of Russian threats emanate every moment in terms of energy blackmail, Middle Eastern confrontation involvement, support of Iran’s exploration of its nuclear potentialities, and opposition to the US-led War against the Islamic Terror, only a paranoid would think that America has the slightest chance to protect its own interests from the African Atlas to India, let alone prevail in the area, without an all-committed alliance with Turkey.

The US needs Turkey so badly that the White House inhabitant and his power sharing Congress and Senate opponents should compete for Turkey’s favours, and incite Ankara to return in force from Somalia to Caucasus and from Algeria to Iraq. Yet, demented Pelosi supports unnecessary pro-Armenian resolutions (that concern the past, not the present), and support is offered to the one Turk who has chances – if ruling Turkey – to cause colossal damage to the US indispensable ally, Islamic terrorist premier Erdogan. Even worse, the only warrantors of Turkey’s superior military power are viewed rather inimically, although they are politically and ideologically close the US ruling class, and in addition are supported by an undeniably overwhelming majority of Turks (oscillating around 70 to 75%).

The US indirect support to Erdogan is undeniable; suffice it to read the New York Times, and you get the feeling that capital of America is Mecca, and that Pelosi’s and Bush’s common enemy is the Secularist Rainbow of Turkish political parties (Nationalist, Conservative and Social-Democrat), which are expected to total 70 to 75% in the forthcoming July elections. The massive manifestations of overwhelming popular rejection of Erdogan’s Islamist agenda did not get adequate coverage in the US and the EU mass media, and when they did, the reader would be maneuvered to be negatively predisposed.

Explosive situation between Turkey and the US in Iraq

However, last week two US F-16 fighter jets based in Iraq made an incursion into Turkish airspace; anti-Erdogan and pro-secular Turkish media interpreted the event as an attempt to intimidate Ankara into refraining from any action inside Iraq. The US said the violation of the airspace was "unintended" and was under investigation. Then, the Turkish premier warned Washington there should be no repeat.

The event took place on a harassed background of Kurdish terrorist guerrilla that has long been highly and severely denounced by various populations that inhabit along with Turks the SE provinces of Turkey.

Turkey made public the proofs of the PKK group’s involvement in the recent suicide bombing in Ankara and in a landmine attack on troops. The PKK has been supported and maneuvered by France since 1984, and PKK’s demands for Kurdistan’s ‘independence’ have always met France’s sympathies despite the outright majority of the non Kurdish populations that the PKK claims as Kurds
Have repeatedly rejected this perspective, enjoying their status of Turkish citizens. Turkey blames the group for 30,000 deaths since then.

With Turkey’ ongoing military campaign against the PKK in plain action, with some of the Iraqi Kurds overtly supporting the PKK, with the terrible oppression exercised by some tyrannical Iraqi Kurdish groups over various Iraqi minorities in the area of Iraqi Kurdistan (Turkmens, Aramaeans, Yazidis, Armenians, Circassians, and others), and with the fanatic but naïve Turkish premier saying in an interview with the private NTV news channel that Iraq, the US and Turkey should carry out a joint operation against the PKK, one understands the volatility of the situation. If one takes into consideration that the US has warned Ankara that sending troops into Iraq would complicate the situation, one can get the use of the situation that the paranoid anti-Turkish US lobbying and the secretive, racist, European Freemasonic lodges may attempt to make.

The forthcoming Turkish elections and the US way to help Erdogan

If we place the aforementioned within the context of the forthcoming elections, we get a clear idea of what may soon be attempted.

As it happens, with the Turkish opposition uniformed into three anti-Islamist parties, an ultra-nationalist (expected to gather 15 to 20%), a conservative (estimated at 10 to 15%), and a social-democratic (projected to reach 25 to 30%), the loathsome Islamists have no chance to achieve majority in the new parliament. Their efforts to either elect an Islamic terrorist as president or to modify the constitution will therefore fail, and normally a tripartite coalition will run the country, re-launching Mustafa Kemal Ataturk’s programs and projects. This would be disastrous for the anti-Turkish side of the EU; they will not be in a position to demonize Turks as Muslims (who supposedly do not drink alcohol during dinners and lunches at Brussels) to later illustrate them as non European and fanatic radicals. It will also be disastrous for the anti-Turkish US lobbying because action will be drastically taken.

So, the EU and US forces that support Erdogan must act now; tomorrow it will be very late, and they will not find an imbecile as Turkish premier. How can they help Erdogan to win the elections he is going to normally lose?

Turkey to annex Northern Iraq?

There is only one king maker in the world: Victory. In front of a military victory, defeat of the PKK and the Iraqi Kurds, possible merge with the Turkmens at Kirkuk, and even more theatrically, eventual clash with the Americans in Northern Iraq, Erdogan would certainly appear as the greatest man in the history of Turkey after Ataturk. An annexation of Mosul, Arbil, Kirkuk, and Suleymaniyeh would be presented by Erdogan as the end of the Kurdish problem, and a deal with Iran and Russia would help him consolidate his grip in view of the pending American departure. This would terminate the negotiations with EU but Erdogan’s victory would mean to Americans and to lesser extent to Europeans that their main obstacle in controlling Turkey economically, the secular military establishment, lost the power in Ankara. This would signal the beginning of a stronger US – EU commitment to Kurdistan’s independence, and to Turkey’s defamation as an Islamic extremist country whereby the Kurds ‘suffer’. Turkey’s inner clashes, Turkey’s involvement in the deterioration of the European states’ confrontation with their Muslim minorities, the formation of an independent Kurdistan, the Turkish explosion in the Balkans, and the establishment of the Russian – Turkish – Iranian alliance would then trigger the most unbelievable political earthquake in Europe’s History. What the apostate Freemasonic lodge was not able to achieve during 50 long years will then be materialized within months. The European Union they envisioned would then rise at last – extremely different from the present one.