A Ready-Made Baby
In this wondrous technological age we live in, some of the most significant advances have occurred in the area of childbirth. No longer does a woman, or her male partner, have to be fertile or potent in order to experience the joys of motherhood.
It started with wives, whose husbands' joysticks malfunctioned. A few years ago, In-Vitro Fertilization, or IVF, became popular. This basically involved having test tube babies through artificial insemination. Then fertile single women, who wanted children without the nuisance of a live-in male partner slobbering all over them and getting in their hair, started getting the job done by visiting sperm banks. Now even this is becoming old hat.
Janice is a 39 year old woman living in England. When Janice was 29, her uterus had to be removed due to a medical condition. I suppose she initially resigned herself to never experiencing the joys of motherhood but no longer.
Recently Janice read about Dr. Naina Patel from Anand in India, who has become universally renowned for bringing about a surrogacy revolution. So last September, Janice headed to Anand to consult with Dr. Patel. Janice discovered to her delight that not only will she have a baby; she really does not have to anything at all except to pay for the service.
Here's how it will work? Dr. Patel will locate a suitable Indian sperm donor and then impregnate a healthy Indian female, who will carry the baby to full term and delivery. All Janice has to do is to show up nine months later and her pick up her ready-made baby. Janice will fork out about $30,000 for the service still cheap, considering that a similar procedure in Britain would cost $200,000.
In my personal opinion, since Janice will have no biological connection with her baby, I don't understand why she does not just adopt one. It could be that adoption agencies may be reluctant to give a baby to a single woman. Is there any law regarding this in the US?
Janice, at least, has the excuse for seeking surrogacy because she is medically unable to conceive. Some fertility clinics have been approached by perfectly healthy young women, who want to experience the joys of motherhood without the inconvenience of pregnancy and the agony of childbirth. They want an instant baby, as it were.
I am aware that we are living in an age of easy convenience and instant gratification, but this is carrying a bit too far.
It started with wives, whose husbands' joysticks malfunctioned. A few years ago, In-Vitro Fertilization, or IVF, became popular. This basically involved having test tube babies through artificial insemination. Then fertile single women, who wanted children without the nuisance of a live-in male partner slobbering all over them and getting in their hair, started getting the job done by visiting sperm banks. Now even this is becoming old hat.
Janice is a 39 year old woman living in England. When Janice was 29, her uterus had to be removed due to a medical condition. I suppose she initially resigned herself to never experiencing the joys of motherhood but no longer.
Recently Janice read about Dr. Naina Patel from Anand in India, who has become universally renowned for bringing about a surrogacy revolution. So last September, Janice headed to Anand to consult with Dr. Patel. Janice discovered to her delight that not only will she have a baby; she really does not have to anything at all except to pay for the service.
Here's how it will work? Dr. Patel will locate a suitable Indian sperm donor and then impregnate a healthy Indian female, who will carry the baby to full term and delivery. All Janice has to do is to show up nine months later and her pick up her ready-made baby. Janice will fork out about $30,000 for the service still cheap, considering that a similar procedure in Britain would cost $200,000.
In my personal opinion, since Janice will have no biological connection with her baby, I don't understand why she does not just adopt one. It could be that adoption agencies may be reluctant to give a baby to a single woman. Is there any law regarding this in the US?
Janice, at least, has the excuse for seeking surrogacy because she is medically unable to conceive. Some fertility clinics have been approached by perfectly healthy young women, who want to experience the joys of motherhood without the inconvenience of pregnancy and the agony of childbirth. They want an instant baby, as it were.
I am aware that we are living in an age of easy convenience and instant gratification, but this is carrying a bit too far.

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- Premature Babies - Is To Early To Late
- Surrogate Motherhood - Becoming a Surrogate Mother
- Babies galore for the broody French
- Benefits of a Maternity Exercise Routine
- Preemies Can Carry Health Risks Into Adulthood
- Expect the Worst
- Premature Babies
- Surrogate Mothers in India - Costs, Laws, Medical Facilities & Culture
- Maternity Reflexology - Case Studies
- How to Have a Maternity Without Extra Weight
- Benefits of Abdomen Supports
- Wombs for Rent: Outsourcing Birth
- The Transformation to Motherhood
- How to Transition Back to Work After Maternity Leave
- Do You Need A Maternity Nurse?
- 5 Benefits of Slowing Down: Tales of a Pregnant Pause
- Hospital With Bed Shortage Puts Pregnant Women in Hotel
- Persistent Crying - Baby Care
- Dangers of Commercial baby shampoo
- Regular Exercise During Pregnancy Promotes a Healthy Baby and an Easier Birth




