Amir Khan and Frank Warren Threaten Facebook With Legal Action
The WBA light-welterweight champion and his promoter want the website to remove material they see as defamatory and racist
The WBA light welterweight champion Amir Khan and his promoter, Frank Warren, are squaring up to the social networking site Facebook in a legal battle that could have far-reaching consequences.
The pair have engaged lawyers to threaten the US internet company with action over the use of images and names alongside material they consider to be defamatory and racist. Stephen Taylor Heath, head of sports and media at Lupton Fawcett, said that a cursory search of Facebook quickly led to "bogus" pages that used the images and names of the pair to link to material that would be "highly defamatory" if published in a newspaper or magazine.
Warren, who has fought several high-profile legal battles, is understood to be determined to force Facebook to change its policy and take responsibility for the more unsavory opinions of its registered users. Taylor Heath has called on other sports stars and celebrities to come forward. There is a legal grey area about the extent to which the operator of a website, or the provider of community tools, can be held liable for comments posted.
"The problem is when you search for a celebrity on the site you also come across pages using the celebrity's name and image that have no official link but in some instances are full of defamatory and illegal content," Taylor Heath said.
"At the moment the owners of Facebook do not seem to be taking this problem seriously. We have written to them outlining our concerns but all we received was a standard acknowledgment. We are still awaiting a response from their legal department."
The row goes to the heart of a debate about the extent to which internet service providers, search engines, message boards and social networking sites should be responsible for material posted by users. Warren and Khan want Facebook to remove defamatory and racist material, as well as responding more promptly when it is flagged up.
Under its terms and conditions, Facebook promises to remove posts that are "abusive, vulgar, hateful or racially and ethnically objectionable". However, the sheer volume of material posted is difficult to moderate and Facebook relies on users to notify it of serious breaches.
"We want Facebook to be a place where people can discuss issues and current affairs while respecting the rights and feelings of others," the company said this year, in response to complaints from anti-racism campaigners. "However, there is no place for content that is threatening, abusive, hateful, or racially or ethnically objectionable on the site and Facebook will remove any such content that violates our terms of use when it is reported."
Following similar complaints, the Google-owned video sharing website YouTube promises to act promptly when it receives complaints about copyrighted material or videos that are offensive or glamorize violence. But it has resisted policing the site itself.
Taylor Heath stressed that his clients did not have a problem with fan sites or fair comment around the sport, but want to clamp down on comments that were seriously racist or defamatory.
The pair have engaged lawyers to threaten the US internet company with action over the use of images and names alongside material they consider to be defamatory and racist. Stephen Taylor Heath, head of sports and media at Lupton Fawcett, said that a cursory search of Facebook quickly led to "bogus" pages that used the images and names of the pair to link to material that would be "highly defamatory" if published in a newspaper or magazine.
Warren, who has fought several high-profile legal battles, is understood to be determined to force Facebook to change its policy and take responsibility for the more unsavory opinions of its registered users. Taylor Heath has called on other sports stars and celebrities to come forward. There is a legal grey area about the extent to which the operator of a website, or the provider of community tools, can be held liable for comments posted.
"The problem is when you search for a celebrity on the site you also come across pages using the celebrity's name and image that have no official link but in some instances are full of defamatory and illegal content," Taylor Heath said.
"At the moment the owners of Facebook do not seem to be taking this problem seriously. We have written to them outlining our concerns but all we received was a standard acknowledgment. We are still awaiting a response from their legal department."
The row goes to the heart of a debate about the extent to which internet service providers, search engines, message boards and social networking sites should be responsible for material posted by users. Warren and Khan want Facebook to remove defamatory and racist material, as well as responding more promptly when it is flagged up.
Under its terms and conditions, Facebook promises to remove posts that are "abusive, vulgar, hateful or racially and ethnically objectionable". However, the sheer volume of material posted is difficult to moderate and Facebook relies on users to notify it of serious breaches.
"We want Facebook to be a place where people can discuss issues and current affairs while respecting the rights and feelings of others," the company said this year, in response to complaints from anti-racism campaigners. "However, there is no place for content that is threatening, abusive, hateful, or racially or ethnically objectionable on the site and Facebook will remove any such content that violates our terms of use when it is reported."
Following similar complaints, the Google-owned video sharing website YouTube promises to act promptly when it receives complaints about copyrighted material or videos that are offensive or glamorize violence. But it has resisted policing the site itself.
Taylor Heath stressed that his clients did not have a problem with fan sites or fair comment around the sport, but want to clamp down on comments that were seriously racist or defamatory.

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- Looking for Work? Your Facebook Page Could Lose You a Job!
- Facebook Launches Facebook Lite
- Obama Warns Students about Posting on Facebook
- Author Criticized for Wild Tales about the Founding of Facebook
- Buzzle Launches New Feature-packed Social Networking Platform
- Puke Your Guts Out and Post it on Facebook!
- Facebook Sued Regarding Sexual Predators
- Facebook Changes Infuriate Thousands of Users
- Is Facebook Turning Us Into Neanderthals?
- Facebook Challenges Myspace As Place for the Cool Set to Hang Out
- District 9 Labelled Xenophobic By Nigerians
- Facebook Couple With Same Name to Marry
- Internet Crowd-sourcing Used to Create Animated Film
- Iran Warns of Crackdown Against Protests Marking 1999 Student Riots
- Facebook Hires Lobbyists to Push Privacy Agenda
- Digital Sky Technologies Takes $200m Stake in Facebook
- On Film: Vampire Settings You Can Sink Your Teeth Into
- Facebook Poll Asks if Obama Should be Killed



