US Overtures Divide Iran's Policymakers
Foreign minister says Tehran would be 'co-operative' in response to changes in American policy
Iran's foreign minister said yesterday that Tehran would be "co-operative" in response to changes in US policy, following the revelation that President Barack Obama's team is drafting a landmark letter to the Islamic Republic aimed at thawing a three-decade freeze in relations.
Manouchehr Mottaki, speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, hedged his response by saying that Obama would have to change Washington's policy in the Middle East, "not in saying but in practice". If that happened, he said, the new administration would definitely find "a cooperative approach and reaction" from the region, and from Iran in particular.
The remarks followed the Guardian's report on Thursday that Obama was formulating a conciliatory letter to Iran's leadership aimed at unfreezing relations between Washington and Tehran and clearing the way for direct talks for the first time since the 1979 Islamic revolution.
There were more hostile noises from other sections of Tehran's disparate government, suggesting that the US overtures had caused disarray. Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati, chairman of the influential Council of Guardians and an outspoken supporter of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, warned against rapprochement yesterday and denounced supporters of the idea as "troublemakers" from "hated groups".
Diplomats in London and Washington stressed that no decisions on future steps were likely to be taken by Washington before the end of a month-long policy review, which began after Obama's inauguration on 20 January. However, there will be important meetings next week aimed at ensuring that the US remains in step with its negotiating partners.
Political directors from the foreign ministries of the six countries negotiating with Iran - the US, Britain, France, Germany, Russia and China - will meet in Frankfurt on Wednesday to discuss the new administration's policy and attempt to arrive at a common position on Tehran's nuclear program. The Iran issue will also be discussed at a meeting of G8 political directors in Venice at the start of next week. Those meetings could lead to a meeting of foreign ministers in February or March to declare a new common policy.
US and British diplomats say they will be looking for signs of willingness from Russia to back further isolation of Iran if Ahmadinejad rejects the olive branch offered by Obama and continues to enrich uranium. Moscow's resistance led to the collapse of a common stand on sanctions last year.
A Russian official said Moscow was prepared to back a tough position towards Iran if no new unilateral sanctions were imposed by the US or EU in the run-up to any direct talks, and if any future sanctions were solely focused on the nuclear program. The Bush administration attempted last year to widen sanctions to target Iran's revolutionary guards for their backing of Hamas and Hezbollah.
Jannati's outburst illustrates the bitter divisions a US attempt at conciliation would sow within Iran's theocratic ruling system. It bears out warnings from some that a US gesture is unlikely to result in an immediate transformation in relations.
Manouchehr Mottaki, speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, hedged his response by saying that Obama would have to change Washington's policy in the Middle East, "not in saying but in practice". If that happened, he said, the new administration would definitely find "a cooperative approach and reaction" from the region, and from Iran in particular.
The remarks followed the Guardian's report on Thursday that Obama was formulating a conciliatory letter to Iran's leadership aimed at unfreezing relations between Washington and Tehran and clearing the way for direct talks for the first time since the 1979 Islamic revolution.
There were more hostile noises from other sections of Tehran's disparate government, suggesting that the US overtures had caused disarray. Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati, chairman of the influential Council of Guardians and an outspoken supporter of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, warned against rapprochement yesterday and denounced supporters of the idea as "troublemakers" from "hated groups".
Diplomats in London and Washington stressed that no decisions on future steps were likely to be taken by Washington before the end of a month-long policy review, which began after Obama's inauguration on 20 January. However, there will be important meetings next week aimed at ensuring that the US remains in step with its negotiating partners.
Political directors from the foreign ministries of the six countries negotiating with Iran - the US, Britain, France, Germany, Russia and China - will meet in Frankfurt on Wednesday to discuss the new administration's policy and attempt to arrive at a common position on Tehran's nuclear program. The Iran issue will also be discussed at a meeting of G8 political directors in Venice at the start of next week. Those meetings could lead to a meeting of foreign ministers in February or March to declare a new common policy.
US and British diplomats say they will be looking for signs of willingness from Russia to back further isolation of Iran if Ahmadinejad rejects the olive branch offered by Obama and continues to enrich uranium. Moscow's resistance led to the collapse of a common stand on sanctions last year.
A Russian official said Moscow was prepared to back a tough position towards Iran if no new unilateral sanctions were imposed by the US or EU in the run-up to any direct talks, and if any future sanctions were solely focused on the nuclear program. The Bush administration attempted last year to widen sanctions to target Iran's revolutionary guards for their backing of Hamas and Hezbollah.
Jannati's outburst illustrates the bitter divisions a US attempt at conciliation would sow within Iran's theocratic ruling system. It bears out warnings from some that a US gesture is unlikely to result in an immediate transformation in relations.

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- Iran Gets Pushy, Calls for End of U.S. Support for Israel
- Arms Dealer Jailed for Sale of Iranian Guns to Kuwait
- A Humble Beginning Helped to Form Iran's New Hard Man
- Iran Parades Captured and Blindfolded Sailors on Tv
- Iran Satellite Launch Raises Tension, Says Miliband
- Iran Launches First Homemade Satellite
- No Thaw With Us As Iran Marks Anniversary of 1979 Revolution
- Timeline: Iran's Foreign Relations
- Iran Condemns Eu for Taking Exiled Group Off Terrorist List
- Iranian Football Boss in Trouble Over 'battle of Sexes' Claims
- As the Crow Flies: Birds Flee Tehran's Polluted Air
- Iran's Fear of Prying Eyes: Bbc Accused of Hiring Spies to Work for Farsi Tv Channel on the Eve of Its Launch
- Premarital Sex on Rise As Iranians Delay Marriage, Survey Finds
- Superpowers Call for Sanctions on Iran
- Trade Remains Stronger Than Ever Between the US and Iran
- Iran Backs Out of Peace Talks
- American Hostage Released
- Iranian Man Stoned to Death for Committing Adultery
- Iran Native Drives Through Crowd on UNC-Chapel Hill Campus
- Iran Calls for End to Violence While Students Attend Suicide Bomber Seminars
- Iran Whistleblower Killed with Drugged Salad
- British Sailors Could be Prosecuted for Entering Iranian Waters
- Iran Begins War Games
- Iran and Syria Deny Israel Claims
- Iranian Negotiators Show Support for Uranium Deal
- U.S. and Allies Seek "Unfettered Access" to Iran Site
- Ahmadinejad Launches Gambit to Make U.S. a Friend
- Iran is Ready to Enter Negotiations on its Nuclear Program
- Israel Will Stop at Nothing to Keep Nuclear Weapons from Iran
- Iranian Plane Crash Kills 168 People
- British Embassy Staff to go on Trial in Iran
- Taking Crazy to New Heights, Iran Detains British Embassy Staff
- Iran Slams Obama, Likens Him to Bush
- Iran Police React to Continued Election Protests with Violence
- Iranian Citizens Increase Protests, More Violence Expected



