US Election: Barack Obama and Mccain Lock Horns Over Wall Street Crisis
Candidates hit critical campaign moment as they fight for a decisive advantage over banking meltdown
Barack Obama and John McCain were fighting to achieve a decisive advantage on the Wall Street meltdown yesterday, a critical campaign moment that could determine the outcome of the White House election.
Obama, at a rally in Colorado, sought to exploit what his team sees as a comment that could be potentially fatal to McCain's presidential chances: the Republican candidate's claim on Monday that the economy is "fundamentally strong". It is one likely to be played over and over by the Obama campaign in television ads.
The Republican presidential candidate backtracked yesterday, conscious that his remark was at odds with the experience of many Americans suffering from job losses, rising prices and the mortgage crisis.
Forced on the defensive for the first time since the arrival of Sarah Palin as his running mate re-energized his campaign last month, McCain did a media blitz, appearing on six morning television shows to say that he meant not that the American economy was strong, but that American workers were. "I was talking about the fundamentals of America, which is the workers, their productivity, their innovation, their incredible performance for many, many years," McCain said.
The Republican candidate, adopting a populist line, put the blame for the ailing economy on the "excess and greed" of Wall Street, which had "betrayed" the American working class.
Obama, campaigning in Golden, Colorado, ridiculed McCain's explanation, saying McCain's team had "sent him back out to clean up his remarks ... but McCain meant what he said the first time".
Obama said the election of McCain would mean a continuation of the economic philosophy pursued over the past eight years by President George Bush.
Despite Bush having presided over the economic downturn, Obama has failed to establish a clear lead over McCain on the economy. McCain, enjoying a poll bounce as a result of Palin's popularity, has a lead in some of the battleground states, while Obama has only a narrow lead in others, often smaller than those held by the failed Democratic candidates John Kerry in 2004 and Al Gore in 2000.
Obama, at a rally in Colorado, sought to exploit what his team sees as a comment that could be potentially fatal to McCain's presidential chances: the Republican candidate's claim on Monday that the economy is "fundamentally strong". It is one likely to be played over and over by the Obama campaign in television ads.
The Republican presidential candidate backtracked yesterday, conscious that his remark was at odds with the experience of many Americans suffering from job losses, rising prices and the mortgage crisis.
Forced on the defensive for the first time since the arrival of Sarah Palin as his running mate re-energized his campaign last month, McCain did a media blitz, appearing on six morning television shows to say that he meant not that the American economy was strong, but that American workers were. "I was talking about the fundamentals of America, which is the workers, their productivity, their innovation, their incredible performance for many, many years," McCain said.
The Republican candidate, adopting a populist line, put the blame for the ailing economy on the "excess and greed" of Wall Street, which had "betrayed" the American working class.
Obama, campaigning in Golden, Colorado, ridiculed McCain's explanation, saying McCain's team had "sent him back out to clean up his remarks ... but McCain meant what he said the first time".
Obama said the election of McCain would mean a continuation of the economic philosophy pursued over the past eight years by President George Bush.
Despite Bush having presided over the economic downturn, Obama has failed to establish a clear lead over McCain on the economy. McCain, enjoying a poll bounce as a result of Palin's popularity, has a lead in some of the battleground states, while Obama has only a narrow lead in others, often smaller than those held by the failed Democratic candidates John Kerry in 2004 and Al Gore in 2000.

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- McCain and Obama on the Issues
- Are Clinton and McCain Too Much the Same?
- Is Barack Obama a Celebutante?
- Sen. Chuck Hagel and Sen. John McCain Square Off on Iraq
- Dick Cheney and Barack Obama are Cousins
- Homeland Security May be Due for Shakeup
- Lipstick-Gate
- Did McCain Take Too Big a Risk with Palin?
- McCain Defends Veep Choice Regardless of Family Scandal
- Did Obama’s Convention Speech do the Trick?
- Touché! McCain Chooses Alaska’s Sarah Palin as VP Mate
- Obama’s VP Choice is…
- Obama Plans to Trash McCain at Dem Convention
- Obama Changes Mind About Tapping Oil Reserve
- New York Times Censors McCain
- Obama Calls War in Iraq a Distraction
- Obama, Clinton Rallied in Unity, Massachusetts on Purpose
- McCain Adviser Drops Off Campaign Trail After Huge Blunder
- Obama Withdraws Public Finance Pledge to Gain Cash Advantage
- Public Questions McCain’s Stand on Oil
- Corrupt Bargain Election of 1824
- Grand Conspiracy Against Tim Robbins at the Voting Booth?
- Steps in a US Presidential Election
- Not to Be Denied, Florida Voters Line up Early to Cast Their Ballots
- Who was the First President of the United States?
- A List of Presidents of the United States of America in Chronological Order
- Question of the Year: Who Will The Veeps Be?
- Caucus Process: How Does the Iowa Caucus Work?
- A Question for the Presidential Candidates



