Rooney Agent Pledges to Fight After Ban 'travesty'
Wayne Rooney's agent Paul Stretford has vowed to appeal against the £300,000 fine and 18-month ban imposed on him by an independent disciplinary commission and announced by the Football Association today. The independent regulatory commission's sanctions follow charges of breaching Fifa agent regulations brought by the FA against Stretford, the founder of Proactive Sports Management, relating to how he acquired the right to represent Rooney in 2002.
The charges were also for improper conduct in relation to Stretford's "making of false and/or misleading witness statements to police and giving false and/or misleading testimony to Warrington crown court" in a case about the circumstances of how he came to represent the England striker.
The ban will not come into force until after any appeal or move to go to arbitration by Stretford. The second nine months of the suspension will not be invoked if he is found to have not broken any other regulations. But Stretford denounced the verdicts as a "travesty of the facts". In a statement released after the announcement, he said: "I will be lodging an immediate appeal against the verdicts and continue to maintain my complete innocence of the charges brought against me."
Stretford has fought a long legal battle against the FA over whether it had the jurisdiction to charge him, and then whether he could go to an arbitration panel before a disciplinary hearing had dealt with the case. The commission ruled as "proved" seven of nine charges brought by the FA against Stretford for breaches of the Fifa players' agent regulations. The charges included failing to protect Rooney's interests and failing to respect the rights of third parties.
"The commission found that Mr Stretford did encourage Mr Rooney and his parents to enter into a representation agreement with Proactive Sports Management Limited on July 17 2002 although he knew Mr Rooney was still then under contract with Pro-Form Sports Management Limited," read an FA statement. A charge of enticing Rooney away from his previous agent was not proven.
In relation to the Warrington crown court case, the commission found proven two improper conduct charges. The statement added: "The commission found that Mr Stretford had made a misleading witness statement and had given untruthful evidence in court in criminal proceedings in Warrington crown court, particularly in relation to the existence, dates and nature of those representation agreements dated July 17 2002 and September 19 2002."
A further charge of entering into a representation contract with Rooney for eight years - six years longer than the two-year limit for written contracts between agents and their clients - was also proved. Two other charges of failing to lodge representation contracts with the FA were also proved, but a third was not.
Stretford defended his role. "These charges came about as a result of my appearance at a criminal trial as a witness for the prosecution against men accused of blackmailing me with menaces," he said. "In pursuing their case against me, the FA seems almost willfully to have cast me as the accused in the trial rather than a prosecution witness acting properly in the interests of justice. It has always been my contention that the FA case against me should have been heard in public and by an independent panel. Had that been the case, I believe the verdicts would have been very different.
"Finally, I would like to add my sincere thanks at this stage to all those who gave evidence at the FA hearing on my behalf and particularly to Manchester United chief executive David Gill, [PFA chief executive] Gordon Taylor and to Wayne Rooney and his family."
The charges were also for improper conduct in relation to Stretford's "making of false and/or misleading witness statements to police and giving false and/or misleading testimony to Warrington crown court" in a case about the circumstances of how he came to represent the England striker.
The ban will not come into force until after any appeal or move to go to arbitration by Stretford. The second nine months of the suspension will not be invoked if he is found to have not broken any other regulations. But Stretford denounced the verdicts as a "travesty of the facts". In a statement released after the announcement, he said: "I will be lodging an immediate appeal against the verdicts and continue to maintain my complete innocence of the charges brought against me."
Stretford has fought a long legal battle against the FA over whether it had the jurisdiction to charge him, and then whether he could go to an arbitration panel before a disciplinary hearing had dealt with the case. The commission ruled as "proved" seven of nine charges brought by the FA against Stretford for breaches of the Fifa players' agent regulations. The charges included failing to protect Rooney's interests and failing to respect the rights of third parties.
"The commission found that Mr Stretford did encourage Mr Rooney and his parents to enter into a representation agreement with Proactive Sports Management Limited on July 17 2002 although he knew Mr Rooney was still then under contract with Pro-Form Sports Management Limited," read an FA statement. A charge of enticing Rooney away from his previous agent was not proven.
In relation to the Warrington crown court case, the commission found proven two improper conduct charges. The statement added: "The commission found that Mr Stretford had made a misleading witness statement and had given untruthful evidence in court in criminal proceedings in Warrington crown court, particularly in relation to the existence, dates and nature of those representation agreements dated July 17 2002 and September 19 2002."
A further charge of entering into a representation contract with Rooney for eight years - six years longer than the two-year limit for written contracts between agents and their clients - was also proved. Two other charges of failing to lodge representation contracts with the FA were also proved, but a third was not.
Stretford defended his role. "These charges came about as a result of my appearance at a criminal trial as a witness for the prosecution against men accused of blackmailing me with menaces," he said. "In pursuing their case against me, the FA seems almost willfully to have cast me as the accused in the trial rather than a prosecution witness acting properly in the interests of justice. It has always been my contention that the FA case against me should have been heard in public and by an independent panel. Had that been the case, I believe the verdicts would have been very different.
"Finally, I would like to add my sincere thanks at this stage to all those who gave evidence at the FA hearing on my behalf and particularly to Manchester United chief executive David Gill, [PFA chief executive] Gordon Taylor and to Wayne Rooney and his family."

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- Rooney's Agent Found Guilty of Seven Offences and Given 18-month Ban
- Rooney Wedding: Wayne and Coleen Tie the Knot
- High Time That Rooney Rediscovered His Selfish Side
- United Force and Rooney Brace Set Tottenham's Teeth on Edge
- Rooney's Drogba Dig
- Capello Calls on Rooney to Brush Up His Finishing
- Capello Hands Defences Their Pipes and Slippers By Neutering Rooney
- Lampard and Rooney in Doubt for France
- Big Win for Moyes in Rooney Libel Row
- Rooney Dreams of an All-english Final - and to End Career at United
- Rooney Shows Way to a Brighter Future for Capello's England
- Rooney Cameo Breaks Stalemate With a Grandmaster's Class
- Rooney Out But Mcclaren Plans for Bright Future
- Ankle Injury Rules Rooney Out for Four Weeks
- Tevez Double Powers United Four-by-four
- Russia a Distant Memory As Rooney Extends Hot Streak
- Rooney and Robinson Leave England With Nowhere to Hide
- Rooney Ends Drought As England Stroll
- Rooney Opens His Account to Edge Out Roma
- Rooney Heals Quickly and Could Make Bench Against Everton



