Security: Uk Phonetap Laws Breach Privacy
Government phone-tapping practices violate right to privacy, European court of human rights rules
Government phone-tapping practices have violated the right to privacy, the European court of human rights ruled yesterday. It described the legal discretion granted to the government for intercepting communications as "virtually unfettered". Procedures covering the use and storage of intercepted material should be set out in a form which is open to public scrutiny and knowledge, it said.
The judgment is the culmination of a nine-year legal battle by civil rights groups in London and Dublin who claim their communications have been subject to indiscriminate surveillance.
The ruling will have widespread implications for Britain's current law on phone tapping and interception of communications, warned the groups involved - Liberty, the Irish Council for Civil Liberties and British-Irish Rights Watch.
Although the comments of the European court were directed at the 1985 Interception of Communications Act, they said the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (Ripa) 2000, which superseded the 1985 act, was almost identical.
The case was initiated following allegations that telephone calls between Britain and Ireland were intercepted by a Ministry of defense installation at Capenhurst, Cheshire. The Irish government raised the allegations with British ministers, who said they could neither confirm nor deny the allegations.
Alex Gask, Liberty's legal officer, said: "The court of human rights has rightly found that greater accessibility and accountability is required to ensure respect for the privacy of thousands of innocent people." The Home Office said it would "carefully consider the judgment".
The judgment is the culmination of a nine-year legal battle by civil rights groups in London and Dublin who claim their communications have been subject to indiscriminate surveillance.
The ruling will have widespread implications for Britain's current law on phone tapping and interception of communications, warned the groups involved - Liberty, the Irish Council for Civil Liberties and British-Irish Rights Watch.
Although the comments of the European court were directed at the 1985 Interception of Communications Act, they said the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (Ripa) 2000, which superseded the 1985 act, was almost identical.
The case was initiated following allegations that telephone calls between Britain and Ireland were intercepted by a Ministry of defense installation at Capenhurst, Cheshire. The Irish government raised the allegations with British ministers, who said they could neither confirm nor deny the allegations.
Alex Gask, Liberty's legal officer, said: "The court of human rights has rightly found that greater accessibility and accountability is required to ensure respect for the privacy of thousands of innocent people." The Home Office said it would "carefully consider the judgment".

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- Human rights: Dismal record of Pakistan
- Police Violence Soaring, Says Report on Turkey
- Turkish Police Violence Rises Amid 'culture of Impunity', Say Campaigners
- Jewish Settlers in Hebron Shoot Palestinian Men
- Tutu and De Klerk Plead With Eu Leaders to Send Force to Congo
- Daughter Despairs As China Prepares to Execute Researcher for Spying
- Woman Urges Beijing Not to Execute Father
- UN Reports Murder, Rape and Torture By Congo Troops and Rebels
- Israeli Policeman Headbutts Woman in Palestinian Demolition Clashes
- Reports Detail Congo Atrocities
- Fugitive Kills Himself on Argentinian Tv
- Maldives Human Rights Activist Wins Presidential Election
- Evicted Chagos Islanders Have No Right to Return Home, Law Lords Rule
- Rights Law 'makes Uk Forces Shun Arrests'
- Give Prisoners Right to Vote, Says Un
- Haemorrhaging of Western Influence at Un Wrecks Attempts to Push Human Rights Agenda
- The New Weapons of War
- List of Human Rights Issues
- Human Rights Group Says Saddam’s Trial Was Flawed and Unfair
- Human Rights: Issues, Acts and Treaties
- Facts about Human Trafficking



