British and Us Companies Win Iraq Oil Contracts
Contracts fuel speculation that Iraq invasion was about oil
The Iraqi government is to award a series of key oil contracts to British and American companies later today, fueling criticism that the Iraq war was largely about oil.
The successful companies are expected to include Shell, BP, Exxon Mobil, Chevron and Total.
Non-Western companies, notably those in Russia, are expected to lose out.
The technical support contracts will give the companies access to Iraq's vast untapped oil fields. Oil production in Iraq is at its highest level since the invasion in 2003. But the Iraqi government wants to increase oil production by 20%, as the country has an estimated 115 billion barrels of crude oil reserves.
The US State Department was involved in drawing up the contracts, the New York Times reported today, citing US officials.
They provided template contracts and suggestions on drafting but were not involved in the decisions, the officials insisted.
Democratic senators last week lobbied that the awarding of the contracts should be delayed until after the Iraqi parliament passes laws on the distribution of oil revenues.
Frederick Barton, senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told the paper: "We pretend it [oil] is not a centerpiece of our motivation, yet we keep confirming that it is."Last year Alan Greenspan, the former chairman of the Federal Reserve said: "Everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil."
The successful companies are expected to include Shell, BP, Exxon Mobil, Chevron and Total.
Non-Western companies, notably those in Russia, are expected to lose out.
The technical support contracts will give the companies access to Iraq's vast untapped oil fields. Oil production in Iraq is at its highest level since the invasion in 2003. But the Iraqi government wants to increase oil production by 20%, as the country has an estimated 115 billion barrels of crude oil reserves.
The US State Department was involved in drawing up the contracts, the New York Times reported today, citing US officials.
They provided template contracts and suggestions on drafting but were not involved in the decisions, the officials insisted.
Democratic senators last week lobbied that the awarding of the contracts should be delayed until after the Iraqi parliament passes laws on the distribution of oil revenues.
Frederick Barton, senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told the paper: "We pretend it [oil] is not a centerpiece of our motivation, yet we keep confirming that it is."Last year Alan Greenspan, the former chairman of the Federal Reserve said: "Everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil."

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- Mother Fights for Removal of Dead Son’s Name from Anti-War Shirts
- UK Drug Firms Told to Hand Over Files in Iraq Investigation
- Apprehensive? Oh Yes
- US Troops Surge Ends As Violence in Iraq Falls
- Iraq War 'began Last Year'
- Chalabi, RAND and the Iraq War
- Petraeus Reports on Progress in Iraq
- ‘The Republicans Own This War,’ Senate Can’t Pass Troop Rest Bill
- Iraqi Ally to the U.S. Killed in Bombing; Supporters Vow Revenge
- Sen. Chuck Hagel and Sen. John McCain Square Off on Iraq
- Soldier Gets 100 Years for Raping Iraqi Teen, Killing her Family
- Soldiers in Iraq Save Lives with Silly String
- Suicide Truck Bomber Kills Two U.S. Troops in Iraq
- Three Iraq Veterans Become Citizens
- Walter Cronkite Tells Reporters: "We Should Get Out Now"
- Video Shows Execution of Helicopter Crash Survivor
- Bodies of 70 Slain Iraqi Hostages Found
- Russia feels US presence in Iraq a threat to its security
- How Britain helped Iraq set up nerve gas plant: a 'dirty secret' exposed
- Iraq: Iraqis Demonstrate in Wake of Bombing



