Roses Rivals Reject Merger But Thorny Regional Issue is Still Alive
Yorkshire and Lancashire have poured cold water on the idea of them playing together in Twenty20 cricket
Cricket's two great Roses rivals, Yorkshire and Lancashire, have kept the issue of regional Twenty20 cricket alive by rejecting it for themselves, but suggesting that it might be inevitable for smaller counties when the English Premier League is launched in 2010.
Their stance will further un-nerve rural counties such as Derbyshire, Leicestershire and Northamptonshire as a campaign begins among counties with international grounds to abandon the traditional 18-team format.
Sean Morris, the chief executive of the Professional Cricketers Association, sparked a contentious debate when he floated some form of regional cricket as an option. Morris admitted he did not "automatically envisage the EPL being played by the 18 first-class counties".
Now Yorkshire and Lancashire have given him limited support. Stewart Regan, Yorkshire's chief executive, said: "I don't think Yorkshire and Lancashire would play as a merged side. Fifteen per cent of cricket is played in Yorkshire. But some of the smaller counties, in the Midlands and the South-West, may decide it is in their best interests to merge. I don't think 18 teams is workable."
Jim Cumbes, Lancashire's chief executive offered a similar response. "Sitting in the second city, I don't think we actually need regional cricket in this part of the world but I could see it working in other parts of the country."
Their stance will further un-nerve rural counties such as Derbyshire, Leicestershire and Northamptonshire as a campaign begins among counties with international grounds to abandon the traditional 18-team format.
Sean Morris, the chief executive of the Professional Cricketers Association, sparked a contentious debate when he floated some form of regional cricket as an option. Morris admitted he did not "automatically envisage the EPL being played by the 18 first-class counties".
Now Yorkshire and Lancashire have given him limited support. Stewart Regan, Yorkshire's chief executive, said: "I don't think Yorkshire and Lancashire would play as a merged side. Fifteen per cent of cricket is played in Yorkshire. But some of the smaller counties, in the Midlands and the South-West, may decide it is in their best interests to merge. I don't think 18 teams is workable."
Jim Cumbes, Lancashire's chief executive offered a similar response. "Sitting in the second city, I don't think we actually need regional cricket in this part of the world but I could see it working in other parts of the country."
Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.
Use the form below to email this article to your friends.
- Australia: Back to Earth in Perth (And so not liking it)
- Twenty20 Cricket Championship: Beyond Pain, Humiliation and Defeat
- Cricket: Schofield Career Revived With Shock Call-up to England Squad
- Somerset Left Jet-lagged
- Pietersen Takes a Bow for Notts
- Hollioake Keeps Surrey Perfect
- Bracewell Keeps on Moving the Goalposts Before Upping Sticks
- Aussies to Old Trafford
- Counties Asked to Merge for Twenty20 League
- Morris Dances to the Compelling Tune of Big-time Twenty20
- It's the End of the World As We Know It (and Cricket Will Be Fine)
- ECB Set to Discuss Twenty20 Future With Stanford
- Leicestershire
- ECB to Hold Crisis Twenty20 Talks
- Health and Safety is Full of Gas
- Twenty20 Taken a Touch Too Far As India Slump to 76 All Out
- Surrey Entice Lewis Out of Retirement for Twenty20
- I Don't Need Ipl's Money, Says Pietersen
- Stanford's 20/20 Vision is Waking Up the West Indies
- Beyond the Old Boundaries