US to Replace Animals With Robots in Toxic Chemical Tests
Scientists plan to screen suspected toxic chemicals using cell cultures and computer models
US regulators have announced plans to reduce the number of animals used to test the safety of everyday chemicals.
Instead of using animals such as rats and mice, scientists will screen suspected toxic chemicals in everything from pesticides to household cleaners using cell cultures and computer models.
According to the Home Office, more than 3.1m experiments in the UK were carried out on animals in 2006. Of these more than 420,000 were done to test the safety of chemicals. According to the animal rights group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (Peta), more than 100 million animals are used annually in experiments in the US, of which 15 million are used in toxicity tests.
The plans to replace animals in the US, announced yesterday in Boston, will see researchers from the national institute of health and the environmental protection agency develop robotic machines to screen the chemicals. They said if successful the robots could test a greater number of chemicals more quickly.
The results of the research could have implications for the EU's Reach legislation, which requires retesting all synthetic chemicals used in member countries. Critics are worried that the new rules will increase the number of animals used.
The screening machines will be inspired by those developed for medical research, which can quickly test thousands of different molecules in a few days to see if any have potential as useful drugs. "We now are seeing tools newly available to us for chemical genomics research deployed for greater refinement, speed and capacity in chemical toxicity screening," said Francis Collins, director of the national human genome research institute and author of a paper, published today in Science, describing the proposed techniques.
Catherine Willett, science policy adviser at Peta, said: "This is a significant change in the perspective of US agencies, which have historically relied heavily on animal testing out of habit and have been resistant to change."
Instead of using animals such as rats and mice, scientists will screen suspected toxic chemicals in everything from pesticides to household cleaners using cell cultures and computer models.
According to the Home Office, more than 3.1m experiments in the UK were carried out on animals in 2006. Of these more than 420,000 were done to test the safety of chemicals. According to the animal rights group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (Peta), more than 100 million animals are used annually in experiments in the US, of which 15 million are used in toxicity tests.
The plans to replace animals in the US, announced yesterday in Boston, will see researchers from the national institute of health and the environmental protection agency develop robotic machines to screen the chemicals. They said if successful the robots could test a greater number of chemicals more quickly.
The results of the research could have implications for the EU's Reach legislation, which requires retesting all synthetic chemicals used in member countries. Critics are worried that the new rules will increase the number of animals used.
The screening machines will be inspired by those developed for medical research, which can quickly test thousands of different molecules in a few days to see if any have potential as useful drugs. "We now are seeing tools newly available to us for chemical genomics research deployed for greater refinement, speed and capacity in chemical toxicity screening," said Francis Collins, director of the national human genome research institute and author of a paper, published today in Science, describing the proposed techniques.
Catherine Willett, science policy adviser at Peta, said: "This is a significant change in the perspective of US agencies, which have historically relied heavily on animal testing out of habit and have been resistant to change."
Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.
Use the form below to email this article to your friends.
- New-style Malaria Vaccine Could Save Millions
- Beaver 'blight' is a Warning to Uk
- Zoos in Battle Over Knut the Polar Bear's Riches
- Scientists to Speak Out for Animal Tests
- Zoo Faces Lawsuit for Tiger Attack
- Caged Behind a Deep Moat and Six-metre Walls But Tiger Escaped to Kill Zoo Visitor
- First the Sheep or Goat is Sacrificed, Then It is the Hair
- Puerto Rican Animal Control Firm Accused of Hurling Pets Off Bridge
- People Flock to See Shepherd Protest
- Knut's a Millionaire Bear, While He's Cuddly
- HMS Bulwark Brings Britons to Safety
- Illegal Gm Maize Fear Sparks Eu Ban on Us Animal Feeds
- Aussies Top the Zzzz-list
- Pentagon Blamed Over Jail 'sadism'
- The Day the Tanks Arrived at Rafah Zoo
- Brothers Mauled by Zoo Tiger File Claim: But was Lesson Learned?
- Tiger Kills 1, Critically Injures 2 on Christmas Day at SF Zoo
- Killer Jaguar Named for President Bush Had Twin Named Osama
- Chimpanzee Escapes from Little Rock Zoo, Then Cleans the Bathroom
- Intersex Fish Found Off the Coast of California