Divisions in Nato After Us Doubts Afghanistan Tactics
Deepening divisions emerge in Nato over Afghanistan after US defense secretary says allies do not know how to fight insurgencies
Deepening divisions within Nato over its military operations in Afghanistan emerged today after Robert Gates, the US defense secretary, said America's allies did not know how to fight insurgencies.
In arguments often used by British defense officials against American military tactics, Gates told the Los Angeles Times: "I'm worried we're deploying [military advisers] that are not properly trained and I'm worried we have some military forces that don't know how to do counterinsurgency operations."
He added: "Most of the European forces, Nato forces, are not trained in counterinsurgency; they were trained for the Fulda Gap," a reference to the German region where a Soviet land invasion of western Europe was regarded as most likely.
Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, Nato's secretary general, quickly rejected the criticism. "I'm surprised because I have no indication - and neither has the military chain of command - that any country or countries are not exercising their tasks to the highest levels," he told Reuters news agency.
In the Netherlands, where there is strong opposition to the presence of Dutch troops fighting the Taliban in southern Afghanistan, the defense ministry summoned the US ambassador to explain Gates' remarks.
British defense officials said that Gates quickly telephoned Des Browne, the defense secretary, saying his comments were not directed at the 7,000 plus UK forces deployed in Helmand province along with Dutch, Canadian, American, Czech and Estonian troops. British sources said that Gates was directing his criticism at Nato as a whole, not to any particular country.
Geoff Morrell, a Pentagon spokesman, said: "The totality of the piece leaves the impression that the [defense] secretary is disturbed with the performance of individual countries in Afghanistan. He is not". He was saying that Nato as a whole was not structured to handle insurgencies, according to Morrell.
However, Gates' remarks reflect increasing tension and frustration within Nato about how to cope with the Taliban insurgency.
Whatever the concerns expressed by Gates, British military commanders have themselves accused the US of heavy-handed tactics, including aerial bombing - which frequently leads to civilian casualties - and have suggested that is the result of America's lack of experience in counter-insurgency warfare.
In turn, US commanders in Afghanistan have recently criticized British plans to support local militia and civil defense forces in the south of the country.
"One way forward is to increase our support for community defense initiatives, where local volunteers are recruited to defend homes and families modeled on traditional Afghan arbakai [village militias]," Gordon Brown told the Commons last month.
Gen Dan McNeill, commander of Nato forces in Afghanistan, warned that the plan could fuel insurgency.
In arguments often used by British defense officials against American military tactics, Gates told the Los Angeles Times: "I'm worried we're deploying [military advisers] that are not properly trained and I'm worried we have some military forces that don't know how to do counterinsurgency operations."
He added: "Most of the European forces, Nato forces, are not trained in counterinsurgency; they were trained for the Fulda Gap," a reference to the German region where a Soviet land invasion of western Europe was regarded as most likely.
Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, Nato's secretary general, quickly rejected the criticism. "I'm surprised because I have no indication - and neither has the military chain of command - that any country or countries are not exercising their tasks to the highest levels," he told Reuters news agency.
In the Netherlands, where there is strong opposition to the presence of Dutch troops fighting the Taliban in southern Afghanistan, the defense ministry summoned the US ambassador to explain Gates' remarks.
British defense officials said that Gates quickly telephoned Des Browne, the defense secretary, saying his comments were not directed at the 7,000 plus UK forces deployed in Helmand province along with Dutch, Canadian, American, Czech and Estonian troops. British sources said that Gates was directing his criticism at Nato as a whole, not to any particular country.
Geoff Morrell, a Pentagon spokesman, said: "The totality of the piece leaves the impression that the [defense] secretary is disturbed with the performance of individual countries in Afghanistan. He is not". He was saying that Nato as a whole was not structured to handle insurgencies, according to Morrell.
However, Gates' remarks reflect increasing tension and frustration within Nato about how to cope with the Taliban insurgency.
Whatever the concerns expressed by Gates, British military commanders have themselves accused the US of heavy-handed tactics, including aerial bombing - which frequently leads to civilian casualties - and have suggested that is the result of America's lack of experience in counter-insurgency warfare.
In turn, US commanders in Afghanistan have recently criticized British plans to support local militia and civil defense forces in the south of the country.
"One way forward is to increase our support for community defense initiatives, where local volunteers are recruited to defend homes and families modeled on traditional Afghan arbakai [village militias]," Gordon Brown told the Commons last month.
Gen Dan McNeill, commander of Nato forces in Afghanistan, warned that the plan could fuel insurgency.

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- WIll US Involvement in Afghanisthan Work?
- Top Ten Stories of 2006: A Year of Awakening
- Japan Pulls Out of Afghanistan Coalition
- THE AGE OF OCCUPATION: Bury the Dead
- The Forgotten Occupation: Karzai's Rude Awakening
- Ten Pillars of Education for Afghanistan
- The Places In Between
- Meeting the Taliban: Row Over Talks Exposes Divide
- Run for Your Lives
- The British in Afghanistan
- 40% of Afghan Aid Returns to Donor Countries, Says Report
- Peace Hopes in Afghanistan Hit By Aid Shortfall
- We Can Persuade Taliban to Be Peaceful - Expelled Eu Man
- Soldier Killed in Afghanistan Blast is Named
- MoD Betrayed Troops in Afghanistan, Says Coroner
- Afghanistan's Refugee Crisis 'ignored'
- Obama Facing Criticism for Afghan Troop Increase
- President Obama Expected to Announce Troop Surge in Afghanistan
- U.S. Ambassador Attempts to Dissuade Obama from Troop Surge
- Afghan Government Says UN Representative Overstepped Authority
- UN Relocating Staff in Afghanistan Following Attacks
- Two Helicopter Crashes in Afghanistan Kill at Least 14 Americans
- Earthquake Rocks Afghanistan
- Kabul Bombing Target's Indian Embassy, Kills 18
- Obama Keeping Quiet on Adding Troops in Afghanistan
- Taliban Leader Encourages U.S. and NATO Forces to Study History
- Taliban Militants Crushed after 3 U.S. Troops Killed in Ambush
- U.S. Marines Launch Offensive Against Taliban
- U.S. Forces Targeting Drug Barons in Afghanistan
- U.S. Military Operations Ramping Up in Afghanistan
- Pentagon Removes Top U.S. Military Commander in Afghanistan
- Hillary Clinton Apologizes to for Afghan Bombing that Killed Civilians
- U.S. Military Expecting Increase in Taliban Bombings
- Taliban Reject U.S. Offer of Honorable Reconciliation
- Obama to Dispatch More Troops and Civilians to Afghanistan



