At Last, Some Wisdom on Global Warming
Leader: Skeptics are right to worry that Bali did not deliver a carbon-cutting breakthrough. But as a statement of intent it signals real progress
Delegates at a United Nations conference in Bali last week reached a last-minute agreement on tackling climate change. Or rather, they narrowly avoided failure to reach agreement. They established a 'Bali roadmap', charting a course towards a deal on cutting carbon emissions. But since even the best navigators with the clearest maps sometimes get lost, the Bali deal still leaves ample scope for skepticism.
The global scientific consensus is that man's habit of belching greenhouse gases into the atmosphere is destabilizing the climate. To save ourselves from catastrophe we must urgently cut those emissions. Governments must set binding targets to achieve those cuts. That is broadly the international political consensus too, with two caveats. The US does not want to commit to targets independent of the developing world, which is catching up fast in terms of carbon output. And developing countries, chiefly China and India, reserve the right to catch up with the West before subjecting themselves to the same level of carbon austerity.
The Bali compromise, roughly speaking, is that rich nations agree to transfer green technology to poorer ones and specific targets for emissions cuts - championed by the EU - are relegated to a footnote.
The US, China and India, are laboring under a false assumption - that cutting emissions means surrendering economic virility. But once the disastrous consequences of inaction are taken into account - natural disasters; refugee crises; food shortages - it becomes clear that, aside from the moral imperative, there is a huge competitive edge available to the countries that first make the transition to a low-carbon economy.
Thankfully, American public opinion, and some individual US states, which have set unilateral emission targets, are closer to understanding this than George Bush and his administration. The next US President, whether Republican or Democrat, will surely take note of that
Skeptics are right to worry that Bali did not deliver a carbon-cutting breakthrough. But as a statement of intent it signals real progress. At least politicians are catching up with the basic science of climate change. Now they just need to catch up with the scientists' - and increasingly the public's - sense of urgency.
The global scientific consensus is that man's habit of belching greenhouse gases into the atmosphere is destabilizing the climate. To save ourselves from catastrophe we must urgently cut those emissions. Governments must set binding targets to achieve those cuts. That is broadly the international political consensus too, with two caveats. The US does not want to commit to targets independent of the developing world, which is catching up fast in terms of carbon output. And developing countries, chiefly China and India, reserve the right to catch up with the West before subjecting themselves to the same level of carbon austerity.
The Bali compromise, roughly speaking, is that rich nations agree to transfer green technology to poorer ones and specific targets for emissions cuts - championed by the EU - are relegated to a footnote.
The US, China and India, are laboring under a false assumption - that cutting emissions means surrendering economic virility. But once the disastrous consequences of inaction are taken into account - natural disasters; refugee crises; food shortages - it becomes clear that, aside from the moral imperative, there is a huge competitive edge available to the countries that first make the transition to a low-carbon economy.
Thankfully, American public opinion, and some individual US states, which have set unilateral emission targets, are closer to understanding this than George Bush and his administration. The next US President, whether Republican or Democrat, will surely take note of that
Skeptics are right to worry that Bali did not deliver a carbon-cutting breakthrough. But as a statement of intent it signals real progress. At least politicians are catching up with the basic science of climate change. Now they just need to catch up with the scientists' - and increasingly the public's - sense of urgency.

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- Researchers Say Earth is the Warmest It’s Been in 12,000 Years
- Contention on the Catwalk As Fashion Finds Its Conscience
- Hurricanes and Global Warming Devastate Caribbean Coral Reefs
- The Effects and Consequences of Global Warming
- What Causes Global Warming?
- Why Are Glaciers Melting?
- How Do Glaciers Melt?
- Global Warming And Melting Glaciers
- Global Warming
- Ways to Prevent Global Warming
- How to Stop Global Warming?
- Global Warming Solutions
- Global Warming Myths and Facts
- Individual actions to help stop global warming
- Hole in Ozone Layer over Antarctica Reaches Greatest Size Ever
- Global warming and the spread of disease
- "Carbon sequestration" and global warming
- California Sues Automakers for Global Warming
- Global warming's real and present impacts
- The day after tomorrow
- Methane Global Warming Potential
- Global Warming Effects on Earth
- Maldives Islands Sinking
- Global Warming and Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
- Global Warming for Kids
- Global Warming Causes and Effects
- Global Warming Effects on Animals
- Facts about the Greenhouse Effect
- Global Warming and The Greenhouse Effect
- Ozone Layer Depletion: Effects and Causes of Ozone Depletion
- Vermont Farmers Going Green, Cutting Cow Emissions
- What is Global Warming
- Obama Exploring Radical Geoengineering Solutions to Global Warming
- I Think - About Global Warming
- Natural Causes of Global Warming



