Twisting the Pope's Words on Climate Change
Ben Goldacre: 'The Pope condemns the climate change prophets of doom,' roared the headline on Thursday. Basically, if the Daily Mail goes out of business, I'll have to give up this column
"The Pope condemns the climate change prophets of doom," roared the headline on Thursday. Basically, if the Daily Mail goes out of business, I'll have to give up this column. "Pope Benedict XVI has launched a surprise attack on climate change prophets of doom, warning them that any solutions to global warming must be based on firm evidence and not on dubious ideology."
Did he? "The leader of more than a billion Roman Catholics suggested that fears over man-made emissions melting the ice caps and causing a wave of unprecedented disasters were nothing more than scaremongering." The Pope is pulling no punches, and these criticisms have been taken up and propagated by every climate change crank in town, online and in print. "The German-born Pontiff said that while some concerns may be valid it was vital that the international community based its policies on science rather than the dogma of the environmentalist movement."
Golly. Now firstly, his message wasn't mostly about climate change. You can read it for yourself, in its entirety, at qurl.com/popery. It is called "The human family, a community of peace", and it was mostly about development issues and the importance of family. It was also really nice, if somewhat mawkish and occasionally tinged with an edge of barely repressed censorious brutality.
He does mention the environment, and he is very cool on it indeed. "Humanity today is rightly concerned about the ecological balance of tomorrow." Air guitar. He talks about equality and development issues: "It is important for assessments in this regard to be carried out prudently... above all with the aim of reaching agreement on a model of sustainable development capable of ensuring the wellbeing of all while respecting environmental balances. "If the protection of the environment involves costs, they should be justly distributed, taking due account of the different levels of development of various countries and the need for solidarity with future generations."
In fact, the Pope rocks: "Prudence does not mean failing to accept responsibilities and postponing decisions; it means being committed to making joint decisions after pondering responsibly the road to be taken, decisions aimed at strengthening that covenant between human beings and the environment."
But wait. According to the Mail: "The 80-year-old Pope said the world needed to care for the environment but not to the point where the welfare of animals and plants was given a greater priority than that of mankind." Well, what he actually said was: "Human beings, obviously, are of supreme worth vis-à-vis creation as a whole. Respecting the environment does not mean considering material or animal nature more important than man." Next sentence: "Rather, it means not selfishly considering nature to be at the complete disposal of our own interests, for future generations also have the right to reap its benefits."
Sounds very sensible. Perhaps there is a special hidden code that only the Mail can understand. But nonetheless, you care what the Pope thinks about global warming, and about the prophets of doom: because hundreds of millions of other people do. Out of sheer decency, if the Pope speaks sense, at Christmas, I will raise a drink to the man.
Did he? "The leader of more than a billion Roman Catholics suggested that fears over man-made emissions melting the ice caps and causing a wave of unprecedented disasters were nothing more than scaremongering." The Pope is pulling no punches, and these criticisms have been taken up and propagated by every climate change crank in town, online and in print. "The German-born Pontiff said that while some concerns may be valid it was vital that the international community based its policies on science rather than the dogma of the environmentalist movement."
Golly. Now firstly, his message wasn't mostly about climate change. You can read it for yourself, in its entirety, at qurl.com/popery. It is called "The human family, a community of peace", and it was mostly about development issues and the importance of family. It was also really nice, if somewhat mawkish and occasionally tinged with an edge of barely repressed censorious brutality.
He does mention the environment, and he is very cool on it indeed. "Humanity today is rightly concerned about the ecological balance of tomorrow." Air guitar. He talks about equality and development issues: "It is important for assessments in this regard to be carried out prudently... above all with the aim of reaching agreement on a model of sustainable development capable of ensuring the wellbeing of all while respecting environmental balances. "If the protection of the environment involves costs, they should be justly distributed, taking due account of the different levels of development of various countries and the need for solidarity with future generations."
In fact, the Pope rocks: "Prudence does not mean failing to accept responsibilities and postponing decisions; it means being committed to making joint decisions after pondering responsibly the road to be taken, decisions aimed at strengthening that covenant between human beings and the environment."
But wait. According to the Mail: "The 80-year-old Pope said the world needed to care for the environment but not to the point where the welfare of animals and plants was given a greater priority than that of mankind." Well, what he actually said was: "Human beings, obviously, are of supreme worth vis-à-vis creation as a whole. Respecting the environment does not mean considering material or animal nature more important than man." Next sentence: "Rather, it means not selfishly considering nature to be at the complete disposal of our own interests, for future generations also have the right to reap its benefits."
Sounds very sensible. Perhaps there is a special hidden code that only the Mail can understand. But nonetheless, you care what the Pope thinks about global warming, and about the prophets of doom: because hundreds of millions of other people do. Out of sheer decency, if the Pope speaks sense, at Christmas, I will raise a drink to the man.

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- Did the Standard Tell the Truth About the Heathrow Climate Change Camp?
- The Editorials Urge Us to Cut Emissions, But the Ads Tell a Very Different Story
- We Must Face Up to the Flooding, Not Flee to the Sun
- Gore Show is Set to Be Biggest on Earth
- We Must Take the Lead
- It Has Got to Be Al Gore
- China's Climate Change Plans: Q&a
- China's Climate Plan: the Main Points
- Truth About Kyoto: Huge Profits, Little Carbon Saved
- Wrong Targets To Tackle Climate Change
- Global Warming is a Security Threat to Us All
- There is Climate Change Censorship - and It's the Deniers Who Dish It Out
- Interview: Sir Nicholas Stern, Economist
- Don't Let Truth Stand in the Way of a Red-hot Debunking of Climate Change
- The Point of No Return
- A New Rhetoric on Climate Change
- Blair Has Fixed on His Legacy Plan: Tony Saves the World
- Global warming and the spread of disease
- UN Climate Change Conference Brings Grim Warnings, Angry Protests
- What are the implications of the massive thaw that is taking place right now in Western Siberia?
- Apple Quits U.S. Chamber of Commerce over Climate Change
- Causes of Climate Change
- Climate Changes Could Cause Worldwide Crisis, says Report



