West Ham Should Have Lost Points, Says Panel
Soccer: Sheffield United's relegation stands, but West Ham should have been docked points, says panel judge.
The chairman of the panel which yesterday confirmed Sheffield United's relegation suggested he would have docked points that might have sent West Ham into the Championship had he led the tribunal which ruled on the illegal registration of Carlos Tevez and Javier Mascherano.
That was the astonishing verdict of Sir Philip Otton's panel when it delivered its findings on the arbitration proceedings brought by Sheffield United. But the judgment came as no comfort to the Yorkshire club because the former Lord Justice of Appeal's panel also found it could not overturn the decision of an independent disciplinary panel to fine the Hammers £5.5m and not deduct points.
"We can see the force of [Sheffield's] attack and we have much sympathy for [their] grievances arising from the decision and the manner it was arrived at," said the arbitration panel's judgment. "We would, for example, have given much more weight to the deliberate deceit by West Ham officials which concealed the existence of the third-party arrangements."
That refers to the "grave breach of trust" of which the original panel, led by Simon Bourne-Arton QC, found the Hammers guilty. Bourne-Arton's verdict stated that Paul Aldridge, then chief executive at Upton Park, had told a "direct lie" when asked if there were documents relating to the Argentinians' transfers other than those volunteered by the club.
But Otton's panellists could not force a reprise of the hearing. "The [Otton] tribunal has to test the [Bourne-Arton] decision on the basis of whether it was irrational or perverse when it was reached," added the judgment. "This is a very strict test and is very difficult to satisfy on a question very much of judgment and discretion ... and we are not able to substitute our view for that of the commission."
Sheffield United, who are exploring their legal options, said they were "disappointed" that "the tribunal decided not to overturn the disciplinary commission's decision despite concluding that they would, in all probability, have deducted points from West Ham".
That was the astonishing verdict of Sir Philip Otton's panel when it delivered its findings on the arbitration proceedings brought by Sheffield United. But the judgment came as no comfort to the Yorkshire club because the former Lord Justice of Appeal's panel also found it could not overturn the decision of an independent disciplinary panel to fine the Hammers £5.5m and not deduct points.
"We can see the force of [Sheffield's] attack and we have much sympathy for [their] grievances arising from the decision and the manner it was arrived at," said the arbitration panel's judgment. "We would, for example, have given much more weight to the deliberate deceit by West Ham officials which concealed the existence of the third-party arrangements."
That refers to the "grave breach of trust" of which the original panel, led by Simon Bourne-Arton QC, found the Hammers guilty. Bourne-Arton's verdict stated that Paul Aldridge, then chief executive at Upton Park, had told a "direct lie" when asked if there were documents relating to the Argentinians' transfers other than those volunteered by the club.
But Otton's panellists could not force a reprise of the hearing. "The [Otton] tribunal has to test the [Bourne-Arton] decision on the basis of whether it was irrational or perverse when it was reached," added the judgment. "This is a very strict test and is very difficult to satisfy on a question very much of judgment and discretion ... and we are not able to substitute our view for that of the commission."
Sheffield United, who are exploring their legal options, said they were "disappointed" that "the tribunal decided not to overturn the disciplinary commission's decision despite concluding that they would, in all probability, have deducted points from West Ham".

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- Sears Takes Honours for Hammers' Academy
- Curbishley Tired of Paper Talk
- West Ham on All Fours As Spurs Dish Out Third Thrashing
- FA Overturns Lampard Red Card
- Solano Hands Out Cruel Punishment to Fulham
- Robson's Bramall Lane Future Hangs in Balance
- Bellamy Out for Rest of Season But Dyer Recovery Softens Blow to West Ham
- Hammers to Fight Bowyer Dismissal
- Robson Gives Angry Fans the Slip But His Number May Be Up
- Dull, Overlong and No One Cared for the Ending
- Respite for Robson As Blades Carve Up City
- Sheffield United Hold on to Dump City Out of Cup
- Robson Asks for Time As Fans Vent Spleen
- Manchester City 1-0 West Ham United
- Manchester City v West Ham United - Live!
- Eriksson Calls for Improved Showing From 'awful' City
- Selection Whispers Hint at Anelka Move
- Hammers Roar Back to Stun United
- You Should Be Nice to Tevez, Ferguson Tells Hammers Fans
- Little Home Comfort for Curbishley As Kitson Claims Point



