Can We Have Our Chairs Back? Belgian Royal May See Different Court
Belgium's controversy-hit royal family is facing a new debacle over antique chairs.
One of its members has been forced to testify at a corruption trial and another rebuked for bullying journalists, and now Belgium's controversy-hit royal family is facing a new debacle over antique chairs.
Crown Prince Philippe, the heir to the throne, risks a court summons unless he returns a set of 19th-century furniture made for Napoleon, which he borrowed from a state collection to decorate his palace.
The regional government of Flanders has asked the federal government and the royal palace for three years to return several historic antique armchairs and tables, which were ordered by Napoleon for his palace in Antwerp in 1811.
"We can't wait forever," Geert Bourgeois, Flemish minister in charge of tourism and external relations, told Belgian television. "We are nice people and want to solve this amicably, but if needed we will take legal action."
Tom Bridts, director of Heritage Flanders, said the collection put together by Napoleon needed to be returned to the Antwerp palace to go on display. "It concerns tables, chairs, couches and even a bed used by Napoleon," he said. "The problem is that when you loan out something, you expect to get it back when you ask for it. We have asked for it back ... and so far we have not had an answer."
The palace did not comment. Prince Philippe, 47, used tables and chairs from the valuable collection in the 1990s.
The incident marks the latest legal controversy surrounding the royals after Philippe's younger brother, Prince Laurent, had to testify at a corruption trial in January. He acknowledged he was aware funds used to renovate his villa were taken from a military budget but said he had no reason to suspect this could be illegal.
Laurent, 43, who was not charged in the case, became the first senior member of Belgium's royal family to take the stand in a trial. The case increased calls for a purely ceremonial monarchy in Belgium, with fewer royals living off the public purse.
In January Prince Philippe sparked a separate political storm after lashing out at two journalists, warning he would have them barred from the royal palace if they continued to criticize him.
Crown Prince Philippe, the heir to the throne, risks a court summons unless he returns a set of 19th-century furniture made for Napoleon, which he borrowed from a state collection to decorate his palace.
The regional government of Flanders has asked the federal government and the royal palace for three years to return several historic antique armchairs and tables, which were ordered by Napoleon for his palace in Antwerp in 1811.
"We can't wait forever," Geert Bourgeois, Flemish minister in charge of tourism and external relations, told Belgian television. "We are nice people and want to solve this amicably, but if needed we will take legal action."
Tom Bridts, director of Heritage Flanders, said the collection put together by Napoleon needed to be returned to the Antwerp palace to go on display. "It concerns tables, chairs, couches and even a bed used by Napoleon," he said. "The problem is that when you loan out something, you expect to get it back when you ask for it. We have asked for it back ... and so far we have not had an answer."
The palace did not comment. Prince Philippe, 47, used tables and chairs from the valuable collection in the 1990s.
The incident marks the latest legal controversy surrounding the royals after Philippe's younger brother, Prince Laurent, had to testify at a corruption trial in January. He acknowledged he was aware funds used to renovate his villa were taken from a military budget but said he had no reason to suspect this could be illegal.
Laurent, 43, who was not charged in the case, became the first senior member of Belgium's royal family to take the stand in a trial. The case increased calls for a purely ceremonial monarchy in Belgium, with fewer royals living off the public purse.
In January Prince Philippe sparked a separate political storm after lashing out at two journalists, warning he would have them barred from the royal palace if they continued to criticize him.

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- Court Orders Starbucks to Pay $105 Million Tip to Baristas
- Man Fired for Using Medical Pot Can’t Sue, Rules Top Court
- Alabama Couple Celebrate 80th Anniversary, Still in Love
- Anita Hill Stands by Her Words – Again – as Thomas Book is Released
- Mother Succeeds in Court Fight to Get Placenta Back
- Racist, Homophobic Prospective Juror Can’t Be on Jury
- "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" Loses Supreme Court Appeal
- Despite Family’s Wishes, Hospital Plans to End Baby’s Life Support
- Army Court Martial Begins for War Objector Ehren Watada
- Prosecutors: Mom Faked Son’s Retardation, Collected $111,000
- Lawyer Punished for Exclaiming "Lord" in Court
- Common-Law Marriages in Colorado May Be Valid at Age 15
- Supreme Court Hears Arguments About Assisted Suicide in Oregon
- Defiantly Unrepentant Eric Rudolph Sentenced To Life In Prison
- Supreme Court Rules Against America In Ten Commandments Displays
- Supreme Court Rules Against Rights Of Homeowners
- Supreme Court Outlaws Medical Use of Marijuana
- Supreme Court Considering Constitutionality of Ten Commandments Displays
- Destiny’s Child Destined for Court
- Stevie Wonder Sued by Ex-Girlfriend, Angela McAfee
- Interesting Facts on Belgium
- Johnnie Cochran Rests His Case
- Napster: Mad Rush to Download Spurred by Courts
- U.S. Supreme Court: Keeping the Faith
- Marijuana Case Taken to "High" Court
- Florida Supreme Court Expands Its Role
- Belgium: Brugge: Guide To Hotels of Brugge



