Rice Fails to Make Breakthrough in Middle East Peace Talks
Two hours of talks between the Israeli and Palestinian leaders and the US secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice, yesterday failed to advance peace negotiations and produced only a vague promise of future meetings.
The talks, initially billed as a new US drive to restart the peace process, became deadlocked with Israel and the US repeating their conditions for a new Palestinian government before further progress.
The Israeli prime minister, Ehud Olmert, the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, and Ms Rice met at the David Citadel Hotel in Jerusalem. After the talks Ms Rice gave only a brief statement; there was no joint press conference. She said: "All three of us affirmed our commitment to a two-state solution, agreed that a Palestinian state cannot be born of violence and terror, and reiterated our acceptance of previous agreements and obligations, including the road map." Mr Olmert and Mr Abbas would meet again "soon".
The Israelis say there can be no progress unless the Palestinian government meets conditions of the quartet (the US, EU, UN and Russia): to recognise Israel, renounce violence and accept previous peace talks. In a rare agreement in Mecca 10 days ago the rival Palestinian factions Hamas and Fatah committed to form a new coalition government, for which ministers are being selected. But the Mecca agreement did not explicitly meet the quartet's conditions.
After the meeting yesterday Mr Olmert said he would not cooperate with ministers of a Palestinian government that did not meet the criteria. "I am also thankful for the unambiguous position expressed by the US that it will not recognise a government which does not accept the quartet principles," Mr Olmert told the Israeli parliament . "This helps the international community to form a common stance."
The Palestinians say the new coalition government was the only way to prevent civil war in Gaza. They note that Mr Abbas, who is also known as Abu Mazen, negotiates as head of the Palestine Liberation Organisation, a group which does accept the three conditions.
Mr Olmert said he would continue a "communications channel" with the Palestinian president. Mouin Rabbani, senior Middle East analyst with the International Crisis Group, said the US had underestimated how quickly obstacles would emerge. He said the agreement on the new Palestinian government contained "nothing that was inherently incompatible" with the quartet's conditions.
In Gaza Ismail Haniyeh, the Hamas leader who will be prime minister, said the US should push for talks now because the new coalition government policy "gives a large room for political movement".
The talks, initially billed as a new US drive to restart the peace process, became deadlocked with Israel and the US repeating their conditions for a new Palestinian government before further progress.
The Israeli prime minister, Ehud Olmert, the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, and Ms Rice met at the David Citadel Hotel in Jerusalem. After the talks Ms Rice gave only a brief statement; there was no joint press conference. She said: "All three of us affirmed our commitment to a two-state solution, agreed that a Palestinian state cannot be born of violence and terror, and reiterated our acceptance of previous agreements and obligations, including the road map." Mr Olmert and Mr Abbas would meet again "soon".
The Israelis say there can be no progress unless the Palestinian government meets conditions of the quartet (the US, EU, UN and Russia): to recognise Israel, renounce violence and accept previous peace talks. In a rare agreement in Mecca 10 days ago the rival Palestinian factions Hamas and Fatah committed to form a new coalition government, for which ministers are being selected. But the Mecca agreement did not explicitly meet the quartet's conditions.
After the meeting yesterday Mr Olmert said he would not cooperate with ministers of a Palestinian government that did not meet the criteria. "I am also thankful for the unambiguous position expressed by the US that it will not recognise a government which does not accept the quartet principles," Mr Olmert told the Israeli parliament . "This helps the international community to form a common stance."
The Palestinians say the new coalition government was the only way to prevent civil war in Gaza. They note that Mr Abbas, who is also known as Abu Mazen, negotiates as head of the Palestine Liberation Organisation, a group which does accept the three conditions.
Mr Olmert said he would continue a "communications channel" with the Palestinian president. Mouin Rabbani, senior Middle East analyst with the International Crisis Group, said the US had underestimated how quickly obstacles would emerge. He said the agreement on the new Palestinian government contained "nothing that was inherently incompatible" with the quartet's conditions.
In Gaza Ismail Haniyeh, the Hamas leader who will be prime minister, said the US should push for talks now because the new coalition government policy "gives a large room for political movement".

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- Rice to Meet Israeli and Palestinian Leaders
- Iraq Sacrifices Worthwhile, Claims Rice
- Rice Pledge to Protect Japan Cools North Korea Fears
- Rice Calls for Palestinian Cooperation
- Merkel Ousts Rice As Forbes' Top Woman
- Lebanon Rejects Un Truce Proposal Which It Claims Favours Israel
- Rice: Us Has Not Forgotten Palestinians
- Rice Insists Nuclear Talks Should Go Through Solana
- Rumsfeld and Rice Fall Out Over War Tactics
- Blackburn Mosque Cancels Rice Invitation
- Radio Host Fired for 'slip of the Tongue' Racial Slur Against Rice
- Rice Meets German Chancellor Amid Cia Row
- Detainee Flights Have Saved European Lives, Says Rice
- Rice Defends Us Treatment of Terror Suspects
- Israelis and Palestinians 'on Verge of Gaza Deal'
- Syria 'must Be Held to Account Over Hariri Death'
- Senate Presses Rice Over Iraq Exit Strategy
- Rice Too Busy for Women Foreign Ministers' Dinner
- Twice as Good
- European Union Backs Down on Demands to Share Internet Governance



