12 Reasons for Turkey to enter in Northern Iraq

A gigantic effort has been undertaken in order to avert the Turkish invasion in and annexation of Northern Iraq. This - in and by itself - illustrates the immorality, mendacity and hypocrisy of today’s World Politics. When the deals stricken by the French, the Germans, and the Russians with Saddam leave no space for US and UK companies, Saddam ‘becomes’ a monstrous and paranoid dictator empowered with an arsenal of cataclysmic consequences.

However, when PKK criminals carry out a plan threatening Turkey’s integrity, which is the latest wish of an apostate Freemasonic Lodge that still influences political decision making in Europe and America, these very terrorists ‘have to become’ negotiation partners of Turkey, NATO’s second largest army, and the unrepresentative, ruthless tyrants of the Mesopotamian North, Talabani and Barzani, who deploy memorable effort to impersonate the ‘presidents’ of a supposed country and a hypothetical province.

- What makes the US presence in Iraq ‘legitimate’, and Turkey’s invasion of Northern Iraq ‘illegitimate’?

- Are the US ‘national interests’ … holier than Turkey’s?

This consists in a real and perfect ‘logic of paranoia’, and it is definitely imperative for every government and individual to notice, assess and analyze. The politics of two measures and two weights bear witness to the decayed and divided elites and establishments of America and Europe. It would be equally wrong to expect them to either reassess their own lamentable situation or take its assessment seriously into consideration.

Engulfed in their impasse, these elites are currently confused, disoriented and unable to react; that is why it would be extremely misleading to assume that the international situation is the same in 2003 and 2007. In the first case, by contravening the UN consensus and launching the attack against Iraq, the US attempted to confirm their role as the sole superpower in the world. The tragic US failure to pertinently conceive the true dimensions of the problem and to act accordingly, along with a certain number of independent developments, transformed the overall environment overwhelmingly. In 2003 we were in a reconfirmed uni-polar world; in 2007 we have already entered a yet non institutionalized multi-polar world.

Within this environment, we identify twelve (12) reasons for Turkey to invade and annex the Northern Iraqi territory. They are the following:

1. PKK will never be permanently demolished otherwise. With combined French and US support at the level of training, logistics and political guidance, the PKK will play, as it has already for so long, the game of ebb and flow; it will calm for a while now, due to the theatrically set up negotiations, and a few months later, along with the overall deterioration of the present situation in Iraq, the PKK will return in force.

2. Invading Northern Iraq now is the only way for Turkey to permanently cancel any perspective of a Kurdish state, and any threat against Turkey’s natural integrity and security. This threat is real, and the sooner Turkey outmaneuvers this plan the better for Turkey and all the involved peoples. One has to bear in mind that the fake Kurdish problem is not exclusively related with Turkey’s eastern provinces as the PKK criminals, their supporters and allies seem to suggest now, acting within the scope of their racist, anti-Turkish conspiracy. There are in fact several millions of Kurds living in Istanbul, Bursa, Ankara and Izmir. If the anti-Turkish conspirators manage to avert now a Turkish invasion of Northern Iraq, they will have the chance to worsen the situation in SE Turkey very soon, and then to internationalize it. If the anti-Turkish conspirators manage to set up soon – and through different biases – a Kurdish state incorporating parts of SE Turkey and Northern Iraq, they will continue their agenda implementation, plunging the rest of Turkey into an incredible situation.

3. America failed in Iraq, and sooner or later the US soldiers will leave; Turkey’s presence in Northern Iraq is the greatest break waves against Islamic Terrorism emanating from Iraq. The Islamist rebellion against the American presence has taken so vast dimensions that any thought about its potential termination has to be ruled out. Even if the situation continues as it has now, this is a good reason for the Americans to go out; but of course this perspective is a far fetched dream, and one has to surely expect a deterioration within a few months. Within weeks after the departure of the last American soldier, the current unrepresentative situation will be overthrown, and Sunnis in Central Iraq, and Shia in Southern Iraq, after easily eliminating all the other nations and ethnic-religious groups, will start a fratricide war out of which will emanate Anti-Semitic hatred and incurable hysteria. Turkey, if present in the Iraqi North, will immediately intervene in order to contain sick beliefs that cannot be accepted even by the Turkish Islamists.

4. America failed in Iraq, and sooner of later the US soldiers will leave; Turkey’s presence in Northern Iraq will be the only obstacle to prevent Iran from invading and annexing the Mesopotamian South. In a situation like the aforementioned, Iran will be tempted to intervene and support the Iraqi Shia, eventually annexing the Oil-rich southern Mesopotamia. This simply is not possible for Turkey; taking position in Northern Iraq from now, Turkey makes the possibility of an Iranian intervention even more remote and more unlikely. In addition, if the Iranian intervention in Iraq finally occurs in the aftermath of the American departure, Turkey will be perfectly well placed to attack in two fronts, namely the Mesopotamian plains (Baghdad to Basrah) and the Iranian plateau (Sar-e Pol-e Zohab, Kermanshah, Hamedan, Tehran).

5. Turkey’s presence in Northern Iraq will be a great means of pressure on Syria, Jordan and Saudi Arabia for cases related to Islamic terrorism, and Anti-Semitism. This will have an immediate impact on the Palestinian / Israeli balance, and it will induce Syria to renounce to any ambitions beyond its current borders.

6. Turkey’s presence in Northern Iraq offers Ankara a great geo-morphological advantage in the military balance with Iran. This concerns the Turco-Iranian balance of power itself, with no reference to Iraq and to both countries’ involvement there. This is extremely important for the Global Security because by now a nuclear attack against Iran should be advised against. Within a year or two after Turkey’s invasion and annexation of Northern Iraq, Turkey could launch a great offensive against Iran, with the coordination of the oppressed peoples of Iran, the Azeris, the (inimical to Talabani and Barzani) Kurds, the Loris, the Bakhtiaris, the Turks, the Turkmens, the Aramaeans of Khuzestan, and the Baluchis. A generalized rebellion of the various ethno-religious groups of Iran, supported by the Turkish army, and synchronized with the uprising of the Persian monarchists and the Zoroasterians could produce the best dynamics to bring the Islamic regime to its knees. The return of the son and successor of the late Shah Reza Pahlavi would be far better a solution than a combined US – Israeli aerial attack.

7. Turkey’s invasion and annexation of Northern Iraq will be a real liberation for the terribly oppressed peoples of the area, which is a reality on which the international mass media have almost never focused: the Aramaeans, the Yazidis, the Ahl-e Haq, the Soranis, the Zaza, and others who have been oppressed for several years by the otherwise democratic ‘leaders’ Talabani and Barzani in the – quasi-paradisiacal for the disreputable Western mass media – Iraqi Kurdistan. Turkey’s commitment to defend freedom and Human Rights of the great number of ethnic-religious groups of this area will testify to the great difference between the current Kemalist establishment of Turkey and the Ottoman Empire.

8. Turkey’s invasion and annexation of Northern Iraq will boost the Turkish economy; the area will be divided into four Turkish departments, namely Mosul, Arbil, Sulaymaniyeh, and Kirkuk. The restoration, reparation and development projects that have been thus far undertaken in the area belong mostly to Turkish companies, so there will be a continuity. The Oil income of the area, matched with the dynamic Turkish entrepreneurial commitment, will soon make the difference with the central and southern provinces of Iraq that are plunged into chaos under the incompetent and useless US control.

9. Turkey’s invasion and annexation of Northern Iraq will make of Turkey a fully accredited member of the OPEC, which will enable Ankara to shift this organization’s pathetic policies (idiotically shaped by uneducated, uncultured and barbaric Arab ‘princes’), and ultimately outmaneuver the colonial policies shaped and executed since the aftermath of the collapse of the Ottoman Empire.

10. Turkey’s invasion and annexation of Northern Iraq will trigger the correct approach to the so-called ‘Kurdish problem’. In fact, under the stamp of an anti-Turkish, anti-Iraqi (until the fall of Saddam Hussein’s regime), anti-Iranian and anti-Syrian nationalistic ideology, a false impression is given about the real situation that pertains to numerous populations and various ethnic groups. What facilitates the false impression – for which a wide propaganda has long been supported by French academia, diplomats and statesmen – is the recapitulative use of the ethnic name ‘Kurd’ for all these different peoples who at times have little relationship with one another. Political agenda of extraordinary dimensions is hidden behind this historical aberration; part of it consists in the dictatorial imposition of one language as ‘main’ Kurdish dialect that at times differs from other dialects as much as it does from Turkish, Farsi (Persian), and Georgian. It is crystal clear that all these languages, the various religious beliefs to which the native speakers ascribe themselves, and the different cultures that have long coexisted, have to be preserved, and this should be the duty of the Turkish establishment. However, the disastrous French colonial agenda involves the false creation of a non existing nation, the Kurds, which is an aberration, and helps only promote colonial anti-Turkish interests, and exterminate the incredible linguistic, religious and cultural wealth of all these various peoples who recently became all ‘Kurds’ for the needs of the disreputable Quai d’ Orsay. 

It is expected that the Turkish invasion of Iraq will cause a paranoiac and hysterical reaction from the part of the anti-Turkish European racists of France and Austria, Valery Giscad d’ Estaing and his likes. They will try on this purpose to block Turkey’s adhesion to the European Union, stating that Mosul is not Europe! Yet, Mosul is more Western than Pristina and Tirana! As a matter of fact, there was never a clear definition of Europe; taking this into consideration, we cannot draw any conclusion. However, the present situation demonstrates perfectly well how correct were those who for many long years were saying that the 50-year old project was definitely ill-fated and anti-democratic from the beginning. When every effort is deployed for a ‘Constitution’ to be accepted without Referenda involved, one has truly to wonder why a really democratic country should bother to join the EU. The European reactions to the Turkish invasion of Northern Iraq will help Turkey understand that Asia, not Europe, is the politically correct continent for the bi-continental country to promote a large economic, political and military unification project involving Turkey, Kazakhstan, Pakistan, Iran and various other Central Asiatic, Caucasus and Middle Eastern countries. A 450 million people Asiatic Union, stretched between India, Russia and the Red Sea could change the entire world.

11. America will not react.

12. Russia and China will find the development rather corresponding to their interests.