UN Chief: Nato Cannot Defeat Taliban By Force
Official says alliance failing in Afghanistan as Blair admits Iraq is a 'disaster'.
Nato "cannot win" the fight against the Taliban alone and will have to train Afghan forces to do the job, the UN's top official in the country warned yesterday.
"At the moment Nato has a very optimistic assessment and they think they can win the war," warned Tom Koenigs, the German diplomat heading the UN mission in Afghanistan. "They say development can follow military action. But there is no quick fix."
The military alliance "does not understand Afghan ownership" and should "stop doing things on their own," he said. Training the fledgling Afghan National Army (ANA) to defeat the Taliban was crucial. "They [the ANA] can win. But against an insurgency like that, international troops cannot win."
Mr Koenig's forthright comments to the Guardian highlight divisions between key international partners as Nato - which recently assumed military control of the entire country - battles to quell a swelling insurgency.
In an interview with al-Jazeera yesterday, Tony Blair came the closest so far to admitting that the invasion of Iraq had been disastrous. Challenged by Sir David Frost that the western intervention in Iraq had "so far been pretty much of a disaster", he responded: "It has, but you see what I say to people is 'why is it difficult in Iraq?' It's not difficult because of some accident in planning, it's difficult because there's a deliberate strategy - al Qaida with Sunni insurgents on one hand, Iranian-backed elements with Shia militias on the other - to create a situation in which the will of the majority for peace is displaced by the will of the minority for war."
British commanders have argued that UK troops should be withdrawn from Iraq to allow the military to focus its efforts on Afghanistan, where the Nato operation is seen as a crucial test for the organisation.
But Nato commanders on the ground have been pleading for an extra 2,000 troops, more helicopters and armoured vehicles to little effect. Last night Nato secretary-general Jaap de Hoop Scheffer said that caveats imposed by countries on what their troops can do should be lifted.
"My strong plea to governments would be: 'Please help us in lifting those caveats as much as possible ... because really in Afghanistan it is a problem."
Des Browne, the defence secretary, made clear yesterday that the future of the alliance was now bound up with the future of Afghanistan. "The Afghan people, our own people and the Taliban are watching us. If we are indecisive or divided, the Taliban will be strengthened just as all of the others despair," he said.
Attacks have increased fourfold this year and 3,700 people have died, mostly in the volatile southern Afghan provinces. The US Air Force has carried out 2,000 air strikes in Afghanistan since June compared with 88 in Iraq.
Last week Acbar, an umbrella group of Afghan and international aid agencies, said the crisis highlighted the "urgent need" for a rethink of military, poverty-reduction and state-building policies.
Nato commanders maintain that the Taliban are on the "back foot" since Operation Medusa, a bloody operation that killed more than 1,000 insurgents in Kandahar in September, and talk of gaining "psychological ascendancy".
However, Mr Koenigs said any claims of victory were premature. "You can't resolve it by killing the Taliban. You have to win people over. That is done with good governance, decent police, diplomacy with Pakistan and development," he said. Otherwise the Taliban would regroup at rear bases in Pakistani refugee camps and madrasas and return in even greater numbers next spring.
"At the moment Nato has a very optimistic assessment and they think they can win the war," warned Tom Koenigs, the German diplomat heading the UN mission in Afghanistan. "They say development can follow military action. But there is no quick fix."
The military alliance "does not understand Afghan ownership" and should "stop doing things on their own," he said. Training the fledgling Afghan National Army (ANA) to defeat the Taliban was crucial. "They [the ANA] can win. But against an insurgency like that, international troops cannot win."
Mr Koenig's forthright comments to the Guardian highlight divisions between key international partners as Nato - which recently assumed military control of the entire country - battles to quell a swelling insurgency.
In an interview with al-Jazeera yesterday, Tony Blair came the closest so far to admitting that the invasion of Iraq had been disastrous. Challenged by Sir David Frost that the western intervention in Iraq had "so far been pretty much of a disaster", he responded: "It has, but you see what I say to people is 'why is it difficult in Iraq?' It's not difficult because of some accident in planning, it's difficult because there's a deliberate strategy - al Qaida with Sunni insurgents on one hand, Iranian-backed elements with Shia militias on the other - to create a situation in which the will of the majority for peace is displaced by the will of the minority for war."
British commanders have argued that UK troops should be withdrawn from Iraq to allow the military to focus its efforts on Afghanistan, where the Nato operation is seen as a crucial test for the organisation.
But Nato commanders on the ground have been pleading for an extra 2,000 troops, more helicopters and armoured vehicles to little effect. Last night Nato secretary-general Jaap de Hoop Scheffer said that caveats imposed by countries on what their troops can do should be lifted.
"My strong plea to governments would be: 'Please help us in lifting those caveats as much as possible ... because really in Afghanistan it is a problem."
Des Browne, the defence secretary, made clear yesterday that the future of the alliance was now bound up with the future of Afghanistan. "The Afghan people, our own people and the Taliban are watching us. If we are indecisive or divided, the Taliban will be strengthened just as all of the others despair," he said.
Attacks have increased fourfold this year and 3,700 people have died, mostly in the volatile southern Afghan provinces. The US Air Force has carried out 2,000 air strikes in Afghanistan since June compared with 88 in Iraq.
Last week Acbar, an umbrella group of Afghan and international aid agencies, said the crisis highlighted the "urgent need" for a rethink of military, poverty-reduction and state-building policies.
Nato commanders maintain that the Taliban are on the "back foot" since Operation Medusa, a bloody operation that killed more than 1,000 insurgents in Kandahar in September, and talk of gaining "psychological ascendancy".
However, Mr Koenigs said any claims of victory were premature. "You can't resolve it by killing the Taliban. You have to win people over. That is done with good governance, decent police, diplomacy with Pakistan and development," he said. Otherwise the Taliban would regroup at rear bases in Pakistani refugee camps and madrasas and return in even greater numbers next spring.

Use the feedback form below to submit your comments.

Use the form below to email this article to your friends.

- Taliban Overrun Town As Peace Deal Fails
- Dam Holds Back Force of the Taliban
- Nato General: We Need One More Year to Defeat Taliban
- Marine Killed During Mission to Clear Taliban
- Special Deals and Raw Recruits Employed to Halt the Taliban in Embattled Helmand
- 'Jihad Equipment is Not for Personal Use': Taliban Rules
- Marine Dies in Clash With Taliban
- Nato Countries Must Live Up to Pledges on Troops, Says Blair
- Blair Calls on Nato Countries to Renew Fight Against Taliban
- From Soft Hats to Hard Facts in Battle to Beat Taliban
- As Taliban Insurgency Gains Strength and Sophistication, Suspicion Falls on Pakistan
- Nato Claims 70 Taliban Killed in Firefight
- Taliban Plan to Fight Through Winter to Throttle Kabul
- Musharraf Faces New Questions Over Taliban
- Arrested in Afghanistan: Abdullah, 25, an Iranian Jihadist 'rejected By the Taliban'
- Taliban Attacks Double After Pakistan's Deal With Militants
- Taliban Kill Top Afghan Woman
- Better Paid, Better Armed, Better Connected - Taliban Rise Again
- Taliban Not Behind All Violence in Afghanistan, Says Nato Chief
- Taliban Exposes Cracks in Nato



